Shame on politicians using tragedy to push an anti-immigrant agenda
Nothing tests our humanity - or our democracy - more than how we respond to tragedy. Our hearts go out to the families of victims of crimes. We are horrified when we learn the details of their suffering.
But emotions alone are not a sound basis for making policy, particularly when it comes to keeping our communities safe and free. Recent events involving immigrants accused of committing terrible crimes is the most recent case in point.
One such tragedy was the death of a local Milford man, Matthew Denice, who was hit and dragged by a pickup truck driven by an Ecuadorian man, who police say was driving drunk and has since been charged with vehicular homicide. The other needless death involved a man from Brazil who police say brutally murdered his girlfriend.
Rather than respond to these terrible crimes by raising awareness of the danger to our communities posed by drunk driving and domestic violence, three local sheriffs, various legislators and Senator Scott Brown instead opted for political gamesmanship. Calling a press conference, the Sheriff sought to inflame anti-immigrant sentiment and score media points by blaming “illegal immigrants” as a whole for these heinous crimes.
They even pleaded for the Feds to bring in a federal fingerprint dragnet that will scoop up immigrants and U.S. citizens alike into a new federal biometric database (see my recent “On Liberty” blog about why all Americans should oppose this bad idea.)
In so doing, Sen. Brown, the legislators and the sheriffs put a chance to score political points before public safety.
Whatever you think about illegal immigration -- and I look forward to the usual barrage of feverish comments on this point -- you shouldn’t be fooled by politicians who make spurious connections between crime rates and the presence of immigrants in our midst.
In fact, in communities where immigration has gone up, crime has decreased. And while politicians like to suggest that undocumented immigrants are a source of crime, the evidence is overwhelming they commit far fewer crimes than the rest of us (and, by the way, overstaying a visa isn’t a crime; it’s a civil offense).
Simply put: it’s not true that undocumented immigrants bring more criminal activity into the United States.
“There is just not a study out there that supports that” proposition that immigrants commit more crime, says Harvard professor Edward Schumacher-Matos, a leading expert on the impact of unauthorized immigrants on the U.S.
“Not one.”
In fact, immigrants commit fewer crimes than U.S.-born citizens:
“Data from the U.S. census and other sources show that for every ethnic group -- without exception -- incarceration rates among young men are lowest for immigrants. This holds true especially for the Mexicans, Salvadorans, and Guatemalans who make up the bulk of the undocumented immigrant population.”
Local sheriffs and politicians are not the only ones ignoring these facts. President Obama and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano seem equally bent on painting all undocumented immigrants as “dangerous criminals” in order to justify their expanded use of round-ups and dragnets to fill our jails with people who have never committed a crime.
Unfortunately, criminalizing immigration flows comes at a steep price in terms of public safety. It drives entire communities underground. It makes it far more difficult for police to prevent and solve crimes, since witnesses and informants are loathe to contact police officers who are perceived to be little more than immigration agents. Using local police to do the dirty work of the feds also prevents victims of domestic violence and other crimes from seeking police assistance, since it too often results in jail and deportation for victims and their family members.
Here’s another fact: rounding up and jailing people for visa violations wastes billions of tax dollars each year that could otherwise go to fighting crime, building schools, and repairing bridges. This year, we’ll spend more than $2 billion to keep immigrants in our local jails -- although more than half have no criminal record at all, and 20 percent of those with a “criminal” history were arrested for minor traffic offenses.
Could it be that the local Sheriffs see the jailing of immigrants as a cash-cow?
Ironically, immigrants in our country - even those without proper documentation - pay taxes just like the rest of us, including payroll taxes, sales taxes, and property taxes. Unlike the rest of us, however, they are ineligible for food stamps, housing assistance, Medicaid and Medicare-funded hospitalization.
It’s time to cool down the anti-immigrant tirades and instead turn our collective attention to the far greater threats to public safety, namely, drunk driving and domestic violence.
This year, more than 11,000 peope will die as a result of drunk drivers – one every 50 minutes.
The frequency of domestic violence is even higher: – every nine seconds, a woman in the U.S. is assaulted or beaten. On average, more than three women and one man are murdered by their intimate partners in this country every day.
These are scary facts about social ills that afflict all of our communities, and deserve greater attention by our public safety officials. Working to stop drunk driving and domestic violence will save more lives and prevent more tragedies than rounding up immigrants ever will.
The author is solely responsible for the content.
About the author
Carol Rose is executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts. A lawyer and journalist, Carol has spent her career working for and writing about human rights and civil liberties, both in the United States and abroad. More »Recent blog posts
- Who wants their boss making decisions for them about birth control?
- Komen and Planned Parenthood: keep politics out of decisions on women's health
- The silent guest at the State of the Union
- Victory! Government must get a warrant to use GPS tracking devices on our cars.
- Obama administration protects birth control access for women







