Iowa Caucus memories
Tonight, thousands of Iowans will assemble in school cafeterias, gymnasiums and town halls in every hamlet and city across the Hawkeye state for the Iowa presidential caucus. Hopefully, a few of them will have taken a look at the ACLU’s candidate scorecard for civil rights and civil liberties, to see which candidates actually vote for liberty and justice for all.
As a child growing up in Iowa and later as a reporter for the Des Moines Register, I’ve always enjoyed caucus night. It's a cross between a New England town meeting and an Occupy Wall Street general assembly—only with less order and less direct democracy than either.
One of my favorite memories occurred during the 1988 caucus—a night in which Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis had a break-through victory by coming in third (which was a good showing for a guy from New England). It was a snowy night and the voters were gathered at the gymnasium of the Longfellow Elementary School. I was covering the election as a cub reporter, when I got to witness my parents get into a political—public—skirmish at the caucus.
My father was standing with a scrum of supporters for one presidential candidate; my mother was in the camp for another. Dad’s group was one person shy of having enough people to elect a delegate to the convention. Mom’s candidate was short by a number of voters and appeared unable to muster enough support to elect even one delegate.
Dad decided to make his move. A tall and imposing man, he sauntered over to my rather petite mother, smiled ingratiatingly and said, “Dear, we need just one more person to elect a delegate, while your group isn’t even close. Come on over to our camp and make your vote count.”
Immediately, Mom was surrounded by supporters for her candidate.
“Don’t let him bully you,” warned one man, glaring at my father.
I could tell by the narrowing of her eyes that my mother was about to become the proverbial immovable force. “Why don’t you join us instead?” she sniffed, crossing her arms as her fellow caucus-goers nodded in agreement.
Of course, as their daughter, I thoroughly enjoyed the public stand-off between my parents. Great color copy for a budding reporter! But it was just one of many such examples of the bartering and negotiations that take place when neighbors and family members are forced to take a public stance—literally and physically—for the candidates and issues that they support.
In the end, the two camps cut a deal—agreeing to join forces behind one candidate but adopting the party platform of the other. I have no idea whether our democracy was better for that compromise. But I think my parents’ marriage probably was. This year they celebrated 60 years of wedded and politically-engaged bliss.
Soon after that caucus, I cast my ultimate life vote—with my feet—by moving to Massachusetts, home of the secret ballot. And while I ultimately prefer the secret ballot to the public caucus, there is a lot to be said for a democratic process that forces all of us to stand up for what we believe and to stand by our words.
The author is solely responsible for the content.
About the author
Carol Rose is executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts. A lawyer and journalist, Carol has spent her career working for and writing about human rights and civil liberties, both in the United States and abroad. More »Recent blog posts
- Who wants their boss making decisions for them about birth control?
- Komen and Planned Parenthood: keep politics out of decisions on women's health
- The silent guest at the State of the Union
- Victory! Government must get a warrant to use GPS tracking devices on our cars.
- Obama administration protects birth control access for women







