The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from MattyScornD. Show MattyScornD's posts

    The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21565623-america-could-do-better-barack-obama-sadly-mitt-romney-does-not-fit-bill-which-one

    In short: Obama sukks, but Romney sukks more.

    If the economy really is #1, Romney is a distant #2, or so says the consistently right-of-center Economist.

    If Mitt can't convince stuck-up british financial editors, then what chance does he have with the rest of the globe's economic bright lights...?

    Cue the usual right-wing bluster about liberal Brits, commie rags and other american troglodytisms...

     

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    In response to MattyScornD's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21565623-america-could-do-better-barack-obama-sadly-mitt-romney-does-not-fit-bill-which-one

    In short: Obama sukks, but Romney sukks more.

    If the economy really is #1, Romney is a distant #2, or so says the consistently right-of-center Economist.

    If Mitt can't convince stuck-up british financial editors, then what chance does he have with the rest of the globe's economic bright lights...?

    Cue the usual right-wing bluster about liberal Brits, commie rags and other american troglodytisms...

     

    [/QUOTE]


    Yeah empty chair could finish the job and lead us to total ruin and bankruptcy if given 4 more years.

     

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    oooh another ringing endorsement.

     

    Obama Inauguration Preacher: 'America Going To Hell In A Handbasket'...

     

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from BetheKoolaid. Show BetheKoolaid's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    After Obama loses the election, the celebrity President can either become Barack Kardassian full time and appear on talk shows, or go to Europe and be worshipped by the socialists over there. The Nobel Peace Prize recipient did kill many many more innocent civilians with unmanned drones than the war criminal George Bush, but hey, all is forgiven among leftists.. There must be some extra Nobel Prizes for Obama, which hadnt yet been given out to lefty loons like Enron consultant Paul Krugman...

    Close, but no cigar...one more term, and Obama would have had the US with the same tanked private sector economic growth and monstrous deficits as over the pond...

    The Europeans are altogether much smarter than Americans, wouldnt you say, old chap?

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    Catholic church jumping behind empty chair too:

     

    Bishop orders priests to read anti-Obama letter at Sunday sermons...

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Catholic church jumping behind empty chair too:

     

    Bishop orders priests to read anti-Obama letter at Sunday sermons...

    [/QUOTE]

    You know, that violates the conditions of their tax-exempt status.  

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Catholic church jumping behind empty chair too:

     

    Bishop orders priests to read anti-Obama letter at Sunday sermons...

    [/QUOTE]

    You know, that violates the conditions of their tax-exempt status.  

    [/QUOTE]


    Forcing them to provide contraception to their employees violates their tenets.

    It's war baby and payback time is next tuesday.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Catholic church jumping behind empty chair too:

     

    Bishop orders priests to read anti-Obama letter at Sunday sermons...

    [/QUOTE]

    You know, that violates the conditions of their tax-exempt status.  

    [/QUOTE]


    Forcing them to provide contraception to their employees violates their tenets.

    It's war baby and payback time is next tuesday.

    [/QUOTE]


    Church employees are exempt from contraception regulations

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Catholic church jumping behind empty chair too:

     

    Bishop orders priests to read anti-Obama letter at Sunday sermons...

    [/QUOTE]

    You know, that violates the conditions of their tax-exempt status.  

    [/QUOTE]


    Forcing them to provide contraception to their employees violates their tenets.

    It's war baby and payback time is next tuesday.

    [/QUOTE]


    Church employees are exempt from contraception regulations

    [/QUOTE]


    BS.

    The big compromise is Catholic hospital employees are provided free contraception from their insurers and who pays for it?

    It's against the tenets of the church.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from DirtyWaterLover. Show DirtyWaterLover's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Catholic church jumping behind empty chair too:

     

    Bishop orders priests to read anti-Obama letter at Sunday sermons...

    [/QUOTE]

    You know, that violates the conditions of their tax-exempt status.  

    [/QUOTE]


    Forcing them to provide contraception to their employees violates their tenets.

    It's war baby and payback time is next tuesday.

    [/QUOTE]

    The Church has to provide contraception to the their employees?  Who said?

    I thought priests and nuns were celibate.  Why would they need contraception? 

    So bascially the church has failed to convince people to have sex only to have a baby and now wants help from the Federal Government to impose it's beliefs on their congregation.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Catholic church jumping behind empty chair too:

     

    Bishop orders priests to read anti-Obama letter at Sunday sermons...

    [/QUOTE]

    You know, that violates the conditions of their tax-exempt status.  

    [/QUOTE]


    Forcing them to provide contraception to their employees violates their tenets.

    It's war baby and payback time is next tuesday.

    [/QUOTE]


    Church employees are exempt from contraception regulations

    [/QUOTE]


    And what this is all about is lack of respect from this scum in the Whitehouse.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    In response to DirtyWaterLover's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Catholic church jumping behind empty chair too:

     

    Bishop orders priests to read anti-Obama letter at Sunday sermons...

    [/QUOTE]

    You know, that violates the conditions of their tax-exempt status.  

    [/QUOTE]


    Forcing them to provide contraception to their employees violates their tenets.

    It's war baby and payback time is next tuesday.

    [/QUOTE]

    The Church has to provide contraception to the their employees?  Who said?

    I thought priests and nuns were celibate.  Why would they need contraception? 

    So bascially the church has failed to convince people to have sex only to have a baby and now wants help from the Federal Government to impose it's beliefs on their congregation.

    [/QUOTE]


    Dopey.

    Employees of Catholic hospitals.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from DirtyWaterLover. Show DirtyWaterLover's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Catholic church jumping behind empty chair too:

     

    Bishop orders priests to read anti-Obama letter at Sunday sermons...

    [/QUOTE]

    You know, that violates the conditions of their tax-exempt status.  

    [/QUOTE]


    Forcing them to provide contraception to their employees violates their tenets.

    It's war baby and payback time is next tuesday.

    [/QUOTE]


    Church employees are exempt from contraception regulations

    [/QUOTE]


    And what this is all about is lack of respect from this scum in the Whitehouse.

    [/QUOTE]

    You're an azz.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    In response to DirtyWaterLover's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Catholic church jumping behind empty chair too:

     

    Bishop orders priests to read anti-Obama letter at Sunday sermons...

    [/QUOTE]

    You know, that violates the conditions of their tax-exempt status.  

    [/QUOTE]


    Forcing them to provide contraception to their employees violates their tenets.

    It's war baby and payback time is next tuesday.

    [/QUOTE]

    The Church has to provide contraception to the their employees?  Who said?

    I thought priests and nuns were celibate.  Why would they need contraception? 

    So bascially the church has failed to convince people to have sex only to have a baby and now wants help from the Federal Government to impose it's beliefs on their congregation.

    [/QUOTE]


    Your scum cult leader the one who to voted to kill babies if they survived an abortion.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    The baby killer in chief.

     

    Obama In '03: Voted No On Banning Late Term Abortions ... www.realclearpolitics.com/.../obama_in_03_voted_no_on_banning_l... Cached You +1'd this publicly. Undo Aug 22, 2012 – State Sen. Barack Obama tells Illinois Channel that he voted no on banning late term abortions (November 6, 2003).

     

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    What the hell does he know about religion?

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    In response to DirtyWaterLover's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Catholic church jumping behind empty chair too:

     

    Bishop orders priests to read anti-Obama letter at Sunday sermons...

    [/QUOTE]

    You know, that violates the conditions of their tax-exempt status.  

    [/QUOTE]


    Forcing them to provide contraception to their employees violates their tenets.

    It's war baby and payback time is next tuesday.

    [/QUOTE]


    Church employees are exempt from contraception regulations

    [/QUOTE]


    And what this is all about is lack of respect from this scum in the Whitehouse.

    [/QUOTE]

    You're an azz.

    [/QUOTE]


    You put this scum in power.

    And he's going down next Tuesday.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    Kathleen Sebelius what a piece of human crud.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Catholic church jumping behind empty chair too:

     

    Bishop orders priests to read anti-Obama letter at Sunday sermons...

    [/QUOTE]

    You know, that violates the conditions of their tax-exempt status.  

    [/QUOTE]


    Forcing them to provide contraception to their employees violates their tenets.

    It's war baby and payback time is next tuesday.

    [/QUOTE]


    Church employees are exempt from contraception regulations

    [/QUOTE]


    BS.

    The big compromise is Catholic hospital employees are provided free contraception from their insurers and who pays for it?

    It's against the tenets of the church.

    [/QUOTE]


    Well, if they're endorsing candidates, the law says they're not really churches at all.

     

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    In response to DirtyWaterLover's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Catholic church jumping behind empty chair too:

     

    Bishop orders priests to read anti-Obama letter at Sunday sermons...

    [/QUOTE]

    You know, that violates the conditions of their tax-exempt status.  

    [/QUOTE]


    Forcing them to provide contraception to their employees violates their tenets.

    It's war baby and payback time is next tuesday.

    [/QUOTE]


    Church employees are exempt from contraception regulations

    [/QUOTE]


    And what this is all about is lack of respect from this scum in the Whitehouse.

    [/QUOTE]

    You're an azz.

    [/QUOTE]


    Oh I forgot who I'm dealing with here.

    Killing a 20 something campaign worker, at least walking away from her submerged body clinging to life in a car to go sleep off a drunk before reporting that Mary Jo was down there.

    That's ok with you apparently.

    He was your guy.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Catholic church jumping behind empty chair too:

     

    Bishop orders priests to read anti-Obama letter at Sunday sermons...

    [/QUOTE]

    You know, that violates the conditions of their tax-exempt status.  

    [/QUOTE]


    Forcing them to provide contraception to their employees violates their tenets.

    It's war baby and payback time is next tuesday.

    [/QUOTE]


    Church employees are exempt from contraception regulations

    [/QUOTE]


    BS.

    The big compromise is Catholic hospital employees are provided free contraception from their insurers and who pays for it?

    It's against the tenets of the church.

    [/QUOTE]


    Well, if they're endorsing candidates, the law says they're not really churches at all.

     

    [/QUOTE]


    Go to hell you pagan.

    And take your baby killer cult leader with you.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    I guess if fat teddy can kill a 20 year old, it's ok to kill an infant who survives an abortion.

    The democrats have lost their soul.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    I can't wait until next Tuesday there is going to be a rolling thunder across this country.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Catholic church jumping behind empty chair too:

     

    Bishop orders priests to read anti-Obama letter at Sunday sermons...

    [/QUOTE]

    You know, that violates the conditions of their tax-exempt status.  

    [/QUOTE]


    Forcing them to provide contraception to their employees violates their tenets.

    It's war baby and payback time is next tuesday.

    [/QUOTE]


    Church employees are exempt from contraception regulations

    [/QUOTE]


    BS.

    The big compromise is Catholic hospital employees are provided free contraception from their insurers and who pays for it?

    It's against the tenets of the church.

    [/QUOTE]


    Well, if they're endorsing candidates, the law says they're not really churches at all.

     

    [/QUOTE]


    Go to hell you pagan.

    And take your baby killer cult leader with you.

    [/QUOTE]


    Yikes! I don't get the reference - is that Obama?  I knew he was a secret Muslim and an Arab, but a baby killer cult leader?

     

     

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: The Economist Endorses Obama...Again.

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Catholic church jumping behind empty chair too:

     

    Bishop orders priests to read anti-Obama letter at Sunday sermons...

    [/QUOTE]

    You know, that violates the conditions of their tax-exempt status.  

    [/QUOTE]


    Forcing them to provide contraception to their employees violates their tenets.

    It's war baby and payback time is next tuesday.

    [/QUOTE]


    Church employees are exempt from contraception regulations

    [/QUOTE]


    BS.

    The big compromise is Catholic hospital employees are provided free contraception from their insurers and who pays for it?

    It's against the tenets of the church.

    [/QUOTE]


    Well, if they're endorsing candidates, the law says they're not really churches at all.

     

    [/QUOTE]


    Go to hell you pagan.

    And take your baby killer cult leader with you.

    [/QUOTE]


    Yikes! I don't get the reference - is that Obama?  I knew he was a secret Muslim and an Arab, but a baby killer cult leader?

     

     

    [/QUOTE]


    Anyone who subscribes to killing a baby that survives an abortion is despicable.

    Think about it.

    The baby has been born is out of the womb alive and breathing.

     Your President is one of the very few politicians I know of who supports killing the baby.

    There must be a couple somewhere who would adopt a healthy newborn don't you think?

    Has the press ever asked him why he took this stand? No.

    My brother and sister in law flew to Russia and then took a 12 hour train ride to an orphanage in Murmank  where they found and adopted my nephew 20 years ago.

    This is murder.

     

       

     

    Obama In '03: Voted No On Banning Late Term Abortions ... www.realclearpolitics.com/.../obama_in_03_voted_no_on_banning_l... Cached You +1'd this publicly. Undo Aug 22, 2012 – State Sen. Barack Obama tells Illinois Channel that he voted no on banning late term abortions (November 6, 2003).

     

     

Share