Re: The NRA's New Low
posted at 1/18/2013 3:06 PM EST
In response to Newtster's comment:
In response to MattyScornD's comment:
In response to msobstinate99's comment:
Sorry, but I put my kids ahead of the presidents any day. This is a different day and age, why shouldn't my children be protected?
Utterly beside the point.
Neither you nor your kids live under the near-constant physical threat the way the president and his kids do. That's just a plain fact.
Israel = irrelevant to this topic
This is just another sign of the Imperial Presidency.
Obama sends his kids to private schools while he forces poor children to suffer in rotten public schools just for the sake of retaining support from the teachers' unions.
Yes, his children are under threat and they deserve protection
But there he is EXPLOITING CHILDREN and to peddle his gun edicts, denying them even some piddling percentage of the protection his children (and all the other politicians and 1%ers get).
This is typical of moonbat behavior - pay attention to what I say, not what I do.
And you're being hysterical, as is typical.
You really expect he or any other president to send their kids to public schools? That makes no sense. People who can afford to pay more, do. Those who can't, don't.
Gun laws have nothing to do with school choice.
Why is this so hard for you??
Why don't you see that it's shameful for the NRA has to resort to trying to embarrass POTUS' children just to (poorly) make a point? That's a nakedly weak argument, and if they had a better argument they should have used it.