Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension
posted at 8/30/2013 4:58 PM EDT
In response to bostonfan191646's comment:
In response to marco0863's comment:
In response to red75's comment:
Who was the GM? Peter Chiarelli - fact. Hired on May 26, 2006.
Who was Acting GM due to pre-existing contractual obligations? Gorton.
Who had supervised meetings with Bruins scouts and management to discuss how and who he wanted to draft, trade and sign prior to the end of his contractual obligations? Peter Chiarelli.
Those are all facts, that you seem to willfully ignore.
ok Red you are saying that Chia drafted all those players in 2006 and that Rask was a trade done by Chia.
if this is indeed what ur saying. history has just been re written!
Look research it and get back to me show me clearly that PC drafted those players.
also as much as i liked savard he was not part of the cup championship so we can also exclude him ( make it easier)
i have an anology to make. When JFK was president, who was the most important person in his administration. If you just look at titles it was certainly LBJ, being the vice president. However, anyone with a brain knows that JFK's brother, Robert Kennedy, Attorney General, was in fact the chief advisor to the president. It was obvious, as is this, despite the titles. Grow up. When the entire world thinks you're wrong, you're probably wrong.
Oh- so u and 40r 5 of ur comrades represent the entire world- laughable- so i am wrong tons of my bruin fans friends who can teach u something are wrong-
the writer from the hockey journal is wrong
the rangers are rong
tsn are wrong but these boards are right-
ask urself why would i not give Pc credit if he had actually drafted those players- why?
why if u serch even on wikipedia it says Gorton made the trade for rask- even pc said itand u call it tampering so ChaRA must have gotten him in trouble cuz he tampered by signing him,
U FIND ME ONE CLEAR CUT LINK THAT CHIA WAS THERE AT THE BRUINS TABLE DRAFTING ALL OF THOSE PLAYERS AND FIND ME SOMETHING THAT SAYS GORTON HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. NOW FIND ME SOMETHING CREDIBLE AND IF U DO U WILL HAVE RE-INVENTED THE PAST