Re: Cooke suspension
posted at 3/22/2011 1:51 AM EDT
In Response to Re: Cooke suspension
[QUOTE]Oh, right, calling people stupid, deaf and hard-headed just because they don't agree with your idolization of the so-called "Magnificent One"? That's simply swell, Mr "Genius"! If you'd read my post completely before you went ahead on your predictable condescending ways you might have discovered that it was Lame-Ieux's actions, first and foremost, that caused me to doubt his credibility. And if there was, according to your enormously insightful post, really no point in arguing with me and thus giving any value to my opinion, then why do you still do it? Is that a concept you don't understand? gardenbees is right - you're really not that clever.
Posted by MrHulot[/QUOTE]
I must appologize. I didn't mean to be rude.
I must add that I didn't mean to call ppl stupid for not idolizing Lemieux... I don't either. What I was pointing out as being stupidity, deafness and hard-headedness was the "idea" that what Mario had to say wasn't worthy of credibility or consideration because of the few points that you have so kindly brought up. To me, and maybe just to me (that would make me an unclever lonely weirdo maybe), those were weak arguments to rid a guy of his credibility, that's all. I was calling out an "idea" as being stupid. I don't know you. I can't call you stupid. I have more than my share of stupid ideas, but that doesn't necessarily make me stupid, right ? Or maybe I am... lol, who gives a darn...
I think arguing with you is worth it and I respect your opinion... but I was referring to what Lemieux had encountered when he said what he said, not what I encountered when I said what I said. That's why I said, "If I was him, I'd do this and that...", but I'm not him right ?