Re: Jim Hughson Sucks
posted at 12/15/2013 6:53 PM EST
In response to NeelyOrrBourque's comment:
In response to 50belowzero's comment:
In response to gord11's comment:
Your memories are short. If you weren't there (Spring 2011) Imagine 7 games in a row with these guys and then add Glenn Healy between the benches. Their barely-concealed bias posing as professional equanimity and delivered so condescendingly as to be insulting is what wrankles. I'd prefer it if they just broke out the pom-poms and had at it.
The only reason they offered up some charitable opinions last night is because the score wasn't close.
Why else, not a mere mention by them, of Ryan Kesler's obvious, flagrant bit of Goalie interference on the back-breaking 3rd Vancouver goal? The panel back in Toronto all saw it and commented on it. Objective eyes see these things.
No kidding, this is the only reason they were half charitable last night. Simpson even remarked when the first Nuck fluke goal went in, "they sure could have used that in game 7 of the Cup finals and maybe the results would have been different". Well you know what, they didn't get the first goal 2 years ago and you can't change the result, suck it up losers, you can't replay the Cup final and thats a fact Jack or should i say Craig or Jim or heals or whomever wants too cry in their cereal.
Simply not true at all. After Smith tied it up they went on big time rant about him possibly being the best player the B's received in the Seguin deal. Sounds like a lot of people on this forum has used nothing but tears in their cereal.
For my oatmeal Nite! Just put in the microwave and presto, breakfast is served! I guess the Nucks and their fans just pizz me off! I'll get over it.