What's with the Lakers schedule?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from OldFirm. Show OldFirm's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : Why blame me? I'm just pointing it out, the Lakers had an easy schedule last year but couldn't get 60 wins.  What if this year the Lakers get 60 wins, I don't think you will say that this argument is lame because I bet if the Lakers win 60 games this year you would be telling me how wrong I am. 
    Posted by P34[/QUOTE]

    And whose criteria is it that the Lakers must win 60 games? The Celtics had the big three yet they couldn't even win 51. So what about 60?
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from P34. Show P34's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : Yes, dark ages I say. Let's discard the Lakers's 6 won before the Bird/Magic era. And the Celtics' 13 too. Deal? I've been saying 10-4 all along.
    Posted by OldFirm[/QUOTE]

    Even Dr. Buss put 16 diamonds on the latest Laker championship rings. Did you know that Dr. Buss designed that ring himself? 

    The PA announcer also said that the Lakers are raising the banner for their 16th championship. Facts are facts, deal with it!

    Such is life! 
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from P34. Show P34's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : The NBA is a big money business now, not a bush league that the Celtics dominated. Who won the most championship since the NBA hit big-time?
    Posted by OldFirm[/QUOTE]

    You really want us to believe the NBA started in 80s?

    HAHAHA!!!


     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from P34. Show P34's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : Oh, you can't even begin to understand how regrettable my participation in this exercise is to me,  after I realized just how lame the argument you were making was. For that, I blame myself. But, for the lameness of trying to make the argument in the first place, I blame you.
    Posted by Give-in-to-it[/QUOTE]

    Why blame me? I'm just pointing it out, the Lakers had an easy schedule last year but couldn't get 60 wins. 

    What if this year the Lakers get 60 wins, I don't think you will say that this argument is lame because I bet if the Lakers win 60 games this year you would be telling me how wrong I am. 
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from OldFirm. Show OldFirm's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : Do research first. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Super_Bowl_champions Super Bowl in the 1930s?  HAHAHA!!!
    Posted by P34[/QUOTE]
    No SB in the 1930s, but there were NFL champions in the 1930s. Yet you still can't tell us which team won the most NFL championships (hint: it's a team that won a lot in the bush league era).

    Can't blame you for that. Normal fans don't pay too much attention to championships won in the Jurassic age. Celtics fans, of course, have to hold on to that in order to brag that they were (just barely) better than the Lakers.

    10-4  and you can't do anything about it.

    "17-16 and you can't do anything about that either", you say?

    Of course I can. The NBA is a big money business now, not a bush league that the Celtics dominated. Who won the most championship since the NBA hit big-time?
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from P34. Show P34's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : According to whom?
    Posted by OldFirm[/QUOTE]

    Since you insist that the Lakers should not win 60 games every season then so be it.
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from RUMcHale. Show RUMcHale's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : Even Dr. Buss put 16 diamonds on the latest Laker championship rings. Did you know that Dr. Buss designed that ring himself?  The PA announcer also said that the Lakers are raising the banner for their 16th championship. Facts are facts, deal with it! Such is life! 
    Posted by P34[/QUOTE]

    You said a few months the Lakers had only won 11. Wow, they won another 5 in the off season? Incredible!!

    BTW, the Laker banner ceremony was great. The intros of the team by it's own members was classy. Well done Lakers!
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Give-in-to-it. Show Give-in-to-it's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : Why blame me? I'm just pointing it out, the Lakers had an easy schedule last year but couldn't get 60 wins.  What if this year the Lakers get 60 wins, I don't think you will say that this argument is lame because I bet if the Lakers win 60 games this year you would be telling me how wrong I am. 
    Posted by P34[/QUOTE]

    You would be wrong. 

    I don't care if he Lakers win 65 games, if they don't bring home a ring, it is of no consequence. Rings are all that matter for this team, at this stage. The Lakers won 57 games last year in the regular season, that is seemingly your cross to bear. For whatever reason, I can only guess it is the only the only thing you have left in a very weak arsenal of nonsensical ways to attack the team. If it matters to you, well then hey, carry on with it.
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from OldFirm. Show OldFirm's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : Dark ages? The Lakers are claiming that they have 16 championships, didn't the first 5 came from the Minneapolis Lakers?  Does this mean the Lakers actually only have 11 championships? Dark ages you say?
    Posted by P34[/QUOTE]

    Yes, dark ages I say.

    Let's discard the Lakers's 6 won before the Bird/Magic era.

    And the Celtics' 13 too.

    Deal?

    I've been saying 10-4 all along.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from RUWorthy. Show RUWorthy's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : That's because the Lakers are paying Kobe 24.8m, Gasol 17.8, and Bynum 13.8m this year. At that price 60 wins every season should be the minimum. 
    Posted by P34[/QUOTE]

    I actually think 60 wins is a hard target to make. As said above you can win 65 games in a season, but if you don't win a title it's meaningless.

    Lakers will win between 50 to 60 games, same with the Celtics.

    I say this because both teams are veteran teams, and are running the season as if it's a marathon and not a sprint. If you win a close game and play bad it's not such a bad thing. If you lose a second game of a back to back it's not such a big deal.

    I think you guys lost to Cleveland because the Cavs were pumped for their season opener. Plus you'll have teams lift when they play the Celtics. Works the same for the Lakers and also this season, The Heat because of the off season.


     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from P34. Show P34's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : You would be wrong.  I don't care if he Lakers win 65 games, if they don't bring home a ring, it is of no consequence. Rings are all that matter for this team, at this stage. The Lakers won 57 games last year in the regular season, that is seemingly your cross to bear. For whatever reason, I can only guess it is the only the only thing you have left in a very weak arsenal of nonsensical ways to attack the team. If it matters to you, well then hey, carry on with it.
    Posted by Give-in-to-it[/QUOTE]

    That's because the Lakers are paying Kobe 24.8m, Gasol 17.8, and Bynum 13.8m this year. At that price 60 wins every season should be the minimum. 
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from P34. Show P34's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : You are in for a rude awakening, again. Poor little guy.
    Posted by Give-in-to-it[/QUOTE]

    Hey, at least I have the guts to put on record my prediction.

    You poor little man, afraid you'll get it wrong?
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from Give-in-to-it. Show Give-in-to-it's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : Come on! Scared to make a prediction? I say Lakers 52-53 while the Celtics get 56-57.
    Posted by P34[/QUOTE]

    You are in for a rude awakening, again.

    Poor little guy.
     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from larrykevinchief. Show larrykevinchief's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]Boston Fans.. where loyalty is a weapon!  The funny thing about my bretheren in this region, they no nothing beyond their own teams, except maybe a one or two obvious rival teams.  Ask them something truely basketball related about the Sacramento Kings or Charlotte Bobcats and you'll get a bunch of snide or cut down remarks as a way of deflecting their total ignorance to the actual subject.   In essence, Boston fans are pretty much laundry lovers, like a gang banger.  Wearing green and being front runners.  Pride has its rules!     
    Posted by SShoreLurker[/QUOTE]


    "no nothing?"  do you mean KNOW???

    what a ridiculous comment to make..................I'll bet I know more about the league and basketball than you do

    try me
     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from P34. Show P34's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : More than the Celtics.
    Posted by Give-in-to-it[/QUOTE]

    Come on! Scared to make a prediction?

    I say Lakers 52-53 while the Celtics get 56-57.
     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from P34. Show P34's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : I didn't say that.
    Posted by Give-in-to-it[/QUOTE]

    What The F! You said 60 wins is irrelevant. Flip-flopping are we?

    So let's have it then, how many wins will the Lakers get this year?
     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from victorlee1234. Show victorlee1234's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]A opener with the Rockets and then a nice leisurely three day rest and second game with Suns who just played the night before?  Then a hard earned weekend rest before a Sunday game with the dreaded Warriors who just lost Curry.  Hopefully the schedulers stick it to our least favorite down the road.
    Posted by concord27[/QUOTE]

    The League deliberately cooked up a cupcake schedule so the Lakers can get a heads up on the rest of the NBA.  Is this what you want to hear?
     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from P34. Show P34's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? :   Oh my goodness, what courage you have, you are a real hero.
    Posted by Give-in-to-it[/QUOTE]

    I'm no hero, just a Celtic fan. 

    Come on, give us your prediction on how many games the Lakers will win this season. 

    I hate to say this but it's great that a Laker fan admits to the Lakers not being a 60-win team. 
     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from Give-in-to-it. Show Give-in-to-it's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : I'm no hero, just a Celtic fan.  Come on, give us your prediction on how many games the Lakers will win this season.  I hate to say this but it's great that a Laker fan admits to the Lakers not being a 60-win team. 
    Posted by P34[/QUOTE]

    I didn't say that.
     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from RUWorthy. Show RUWorthy's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : Come on! Scared to make a prediction? I say Lakers 52-53 while the Celtics get 56-57.
    Posted by P34[/QUOTE]

    I think both teams will get just over 50 wins each. Probably no more than 56 for each team.


     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    So let's win 60 games, and have the lakers win 59, since it doesn't matter to them.  Then, after disposing of the Heat, we will go to the Finals with HCA.  As "fans" of the lakers, is that what you really want?
     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from Give-in-to-it. Show Give-in-to-it's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : I totally agree with you! I also hope that the Lakers will not win 60 games this year.  How many wins do you think the Lakers will get this year, 52?
    Posted by P34[/QUOTE]

    More than the Celtics.
     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from P34. Show P34's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : Home court is always preferable, but not getting sixty wins on the way to a championship is still nothing but irrelevant.
    Posted by Give-in-to-it[/QUOTE]

    I totally agree with you! I also hope that the Lakers will not win 60 games this year. 

    How many wins do you think the Lakers will get this year, 52?
     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from Give-in-to-it. Show Give-in-to-it's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule? : Since you insist that the Lakers should not win 60 games every season then so be it.
    Posted by P34[/QUOTE]

    Sixty wins is kind of irrelevant when you are winning championships. Regular season win totals are something the fans of the losing teams worry about; obviously.

    In the meantime, get to work propping up that 4th seeded 50-32 clunker your favorite team plunked down last season. By your standards the big three isn't so big after all. And the "great" rondo isn't so great either.
     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from Give-in-to-it. Show Give-in-to-it's posts

    Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?

    In Response to Re: What's with the Lakers schedule?:
    [QUOTE]So let's win 60 games, and have the lakers win 59, since it doesn't matter to them.  Then, after disposing of the Heat, we will go to the Finals with HCA.  As "fans" of the lakers, is that what you really want?
    Posted by hedleylamarr[/QUOTE]

    Home court is always preferable, but not getting sixty wins on the way to a championship is still nothing but irrelevant.
     

Share