Re: Are Celtics Better Without Rondo
posted at 1/28/2013 7:54 AM EST
In response to Karllost's comment:
In response to breaktime's comment:
This season will end sooner without Rondo, not later.
I guess we'll have to watch and learn. This is going to be the rest of the season, not 4 or 5 games, that Rondo is out.
Season was going nowhere fast with Rondo.. sub 500 record with him and getting worse.
Without him we have a great record.. why is that?? Oh right, just an abberation.
Now we move forward without anyone to replace Rondo... how horrible we're gonna be now losing the HOF and starting PG for the all-star team... yet, we just beat the NBA champs without him..
If we finish out the season without superman and wind up even at the same winning percentage as when Rondo was playing... well, wouldnt that tell some story,,, how will you explain that???? I know, ignore the facts if they present themselves and just go with the Celtics are worse off without ROndo no matter what ..
I guess only winning an nba title will suffice... or will it
Rondo has only been out short stretches in the past, not as in this case, for the rest of the season. Watch and learn as to whether the C's are better or worse when he is out for 40 consecutive games.