Beasley?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from hoodrich. Show hoodrich's posts

    Beasley?

     

     

     

    The Cs should take a low risk high reward chance on this guy. Sure he's a bit of a knucklehead but he'd instantly be the second or third best offensive player on a team that's going to have little to no scoring off the bench. 

     

     

     

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from debrit. Show debrit's posts

    Re: Beasley?

    In response to hoodrich's comment:

     

     

     

    The Cs should take a low risk high reward chance on this guy. Sure he's a bit of a knucklehead but he'd instantly be the second or third best offensive player on a team that's going to have little to no scoring off the bench. 

     

     You are wrong.Will plenty of score of the bench.Brooks,Lee,Wallace.Bass.etc.

     




     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from hoodrich. Show hoodrich's posts

    Re: Beasley?

    In response to debrit's comment:

    In response to hoodrich's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

     

     

     

    The Cs should take a low risk high reward chance on this guy. Sure he's a bit of a knucklehead but he'd instantly be the second or third best offensive player on a team that's going to have little to no scoring off the bench. 

     

     You are wrong.Will plenty of score of the bench.Brooks,Lee,Wallace.Bass.etc.

     

     




     

    [/QUOTE]

    Uhh. He's a better offensive player than all those guys you listed! 

    I don't see the risk in a minimum contract with a team option for the second year. That's why it's called low risk high reward

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: Beasley?

    but .. but ... but ... the NBA Champions are taking a chance ... So Fungus is wrong again?

     

    http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nba--heat--michael-beasley-agree-on-training-camp-deal--213615264.html

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Karllost. Show Karllost's posts

    Re: Beasley?

    For a team like the C's trying to build a contender with unknown, young players...a guy like Beasley might be just what the doctor didnt order... We're not winning anything the way the team is constructed now and adding Beasley isnt going to change that..

    Id prefer we stick with guys that dont bring alot of baggage with them...

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     

Share