brooks again fav

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from fedup13. Show fedup13's posts

    brooks again fav

    36pts 6 rebounds 5asists  give him a chance trade crawford  fav shoud go to maine with pressy

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: brooks again fav

    Anyone think Brooks could see some PT @ SF?

    I know he was sent to ME for a tune-up with expectations of him getting some of those minutes that Lee was getting but in a small lineup, couldn't he bring more to the table than Wallace?

    Should Brad give him a look-see at SF in relief of Green over Wallace to see how he does or at 6'5" is it out of the question?

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: brooks again fav

    In response to Mellywitt's comment:
    [QUOTE]


    Brooks is strictly a guard...no D makes his playing the 3 a problem...better to simply run a straight up 3 guard set-up and run off picks at the top of the key set by our two bigmen, probably the Hump and Sully, and let him blaze away with no pretense about him playing any kind of D...Fav should go to the D league where he can learn his NBA trade and at least stay in shape.....he's pretty clueless overall despite some good showings for a few minutes...Shavlik Randolph was much better than Fav is right now

    [/QUOTE]


    Brooks is listed as a G/F ... I don't recall ever seeing him play SF but that got me to thinking if he'd played SF before why can't we use him there rather than Wallace since is offense is so much better (Defense not withstanding).

    Fav vs Randolph, No argument there!

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from Fiercy. Show Fiercy's posts

    Re: brooks again fav

    What???

    Shav is better than Fav?

    Didn't wozzy tell you that Fav is already a LEGIT STARTING NBA Center just like Marc Gasol?

    HAHAHA

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from charliedarling. Show charliedarling's posts

    Re: brooks again fav

    Do not be fooled by Brooks and his D League offensive stats. 

    The D League is just the place to hide his NBA weaknesses as the weaknesses can be swept nicely under the carpet when you only look at points scored.

    I would bet that the guys he has been (or hasn't been) covering are scoring very well against him even in the D League.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Fiercy. Show Fiercy's posts

    Re: brooks again fav

    In response to charliedarling's comment:

    Do not be fooled by Brooks and his D League offensive stats. 

    The D League is just the place to hide his NBA weaknesses as the weaknesses can be swept nicely under the carpet when you only look at points scored.

    I would bet that the guys he has been (or hasn't been) covering are scoring very well against him even in the D League.



    Couldn't have said it any better.

    +1

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: brooks again fav

    My question remains ...  why can't we use Brooks at SF rather than Wallace since his offense is so much better (Defense not withstanding)?

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: brooks again fav

    In response to Mployee8's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    My question remains ...  why can't we use Brooks at SF rather than Wallace since his offense is so much better (Defense not withstanding)?

    [/QUOTE]
    not a good idea for a player who is in 30mm contract.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: brooks again fav

    In response to TheBigTicket05's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Mployee8's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    My question remains ...  why can't we use Brooks at SF rather than Wallace since his offense is so much better (Defense not withstanding)?

    [/QUOTE]
    not a good idea for a player who is in 30mm contract.

    [/QUOTE]


    Brooks doesn't need to take all his minutes ... time at SG (Lee's mins) and some of Wallace's.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: brooks again fav

    In response to Mployee8's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to TheBigTicket05's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Mployee8's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    My question remains ...  why can't we use Brooks at SF rather than Wallace since his offense is so much better (Defense not withstanding)?

    [/QUOTE]
    not a good idea for a player who is in 30mm contract.

    [/QUOTE]


    Brooks doesn't need to take all his minutes ... time at SG (Lee's mins) and some of Wallace's.

    [/QUOTE]

    wallace should play 48 minutes every game. punish him that way

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from Fiercy. Show Fiercy's posts

    Re: brooks again fav

    In response to TheBigTicket05's comment:

     

    wallace should play 48 minutes every game. punish him that way



    HAHAHA

     

Share