Re: Celtics vs. Lakers - Thread to end all Threads on this subject
posted at 6/28/2011 9:09 PM EDT
In Response to Re: Celtics vs. Lakers - Thread to end all Threads on this subject
[QUOTE]Princeton didn't have most MLB titles, but knowing that you have no answers to the signifance of ancient time championships (like Princeton's college football championships), why not play dumb? I mean, what else can you do? "Failing less often are victories"? You mean you don't know you need victories to fail less often? Looks like you need more reading comprehension... Yep, Celtics had another victory this season. Glad that you have something to celebrate: a 1-4 drubbing by the Heat. I mean, for seasons that both of our teams flame out in the 2nd round, that should be cause for celebrations for a team with 21-year drought. Wow, you mean you have to know the top 20 players of college basketball in order to know UCLA's 11 basketball championships and Al Scates? Ummm... you don't have to showcase your weak logic again and again... Yep, keep bragging you win, game over, blah, blah, blah. For someone who was wimp out in many arguments, can't blame you for that... I mean, are you going to answer why Celtics only had 49 chances? No. Are you going to tell us howcome Princton weren't the #1 powerhouse in college football if you want to use the Yankees as example? No. Are you going to tell us why you emphasize on the Lakers' final record of 16-15 and .516 winning % if you dont' want to dwell on negatives? No But hey, declare it "I win", "game over" should be a good move. Sure, you still haven't had the guts to answer the questions. I'll ask again. What about "made the playoffs 49 times"? How many seasons did they play in the NBA? Are those 16 seasons they played in the NBA chances or not? Yes? then you lied when you said "The Lakers had 58 chances to win the NBA title and only did it 16 times. The Celtics had 49 chances to win the NBA title and did it 17 times. " No? then you lied when you said "I never said the Celtics only had 49 seasons in the NBA." I don't have to count moral victories. That's for someone who needs to count the Celtics 4-1 drubbing as victory. Afterall, how many more rounds than the Lakers did the Celtics win? I see...
Posted by MajicMVP[/QUOTE]
I will give you one last chance to redeem yourself and your pathetic arguments.
I will answer your questions. I have no problem answering your questions. You answer my questions with Princeton is the best MLB team. Obviously you don't want to answer that question because your answer will contradict your whole arguement. If you weren't such a p u s s y then you would simply answer the question and back up your answer. I said Princeton has the most college football championships. I answered your question and I backed up my answer that they are the most successful team in college football history because they have the most championships. But see you are comparing apples to count chocula there. I am talking about professional sports and you are talking about college. You should have rephrased your question and asked what colleage football team is the most relevant right now or the last 10 years. Then my answer would have been different. But if you want to know who the most successful college football team of all time is then it is Princeton hands down. The proof is in the history books. History doesn't pose the question what have you done for me lately. History looks at all time numbers not a time period that you think is relevant. But I digress......so as I was saying.....
The Celtics played 65 seasons. They made the playoffs 49 times and won 17 championships. So when the Celtics got to the playoffs they made the most of their chances. Obviously you have to make the playoffs to have a chance to win the championship. Is that not a true statement? Last I knew you can't win a championship unless you are in the playoffs. Is that a false statement? Yes those 16 seaons count as chances to make the playoffs but they didn't. The Lakers have a better pecentage of making the playoffs than the Celtics....congratulations. However, that means they failed more times in the playoffs....ouch. That means the Celtics failed more times in the regular season. Congratulations another moral victory for you Laker fans. The Celtics were not in the Finals against the Lakers in those other 13 championships they won. I mean that is obvious because if the Celtics were there they would have probably won at least half of them or more. I mean where were the Lakers for 9 of the championships the Celtics won. Oh that's right they were in the Finals getting r a p e d by the Celtics. So again I pose another question to you that you won't answer. Would you prefer the Lakers to not make the playoffs or make the playoffs and not win a championship? I will give you a hint. If you are a true fan it doesn't matter if you make the playoffs or not because anything short of a championship is a failure. Maybe not for every franchise in the NBA but for teams like the Celtics and Lakers if you don't deliver a championship then the season means nothing. I gurantee you Kobe would say the same thing. Do you think Kobe considered this past NBA season a success? I am guessing you already know the answer to that question. So keep counting the moral victories and I will countine counting championships. By my count it is still 17-16 in favor of the Celtics. Same as it was yesterday and the day before and the day before that. So did you have any other questions I can answer? I believe I covered all of yours. Now would you care to answer my questions? I am guessing I know the answer to that question. You will cut and past a few of my lines and then circumvent my questions by asking more questions. Patheitc. You know what they say about people who won't answer a question. They know they are wrong. Case in point. Game over.