Cs vs hawks

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: Cs vs hawks

    In response to Fierce34's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Mployee8's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    This is what Fungus does while everyone watches the game and chats here ...

     

    Perfect example of mediocrity

    posted at 11/23/2013 7:47 PM EST

    • Fierce34
    • Posts: 14334
    • First: 12/2/2009
    • Last: 11/23/2013

    Rondo (13) / Crawford (4) / Pressey (.5)

    Hayward (Bd Rts) / Morrow (2.0) / Babb ?

    Jeff Green (9) / Osby ? / 2014 Draft Pick (2)

    Sullinger (2) / Olynyk (2) / Bass (7)

    Hawes (9.0) / Favarani (2) / Colton Iverson (.5)

     

    What a loser and d**k you are indeed!!!

    [/QUOTE]

    Is it my fault that you keep throwing out bad ideas?

    I mean Miami has Lebron, Wade, and Bosh and you think Rondo, Hayward, and Hawes will be able to beat the Heat?

    Stupid!

    [/QUOTE]


    If you are some imbecile that thinks a rebuild is done after 1 season ... then yeah Fungus you would think that's mediocre and you'd be both correct and an idiot.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: Cs vs hawks

    In response to DrBoogiebone's comment:

    In response to Mployee8's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to DrBoogiebone's comment:
    [QUOTE]


    Didn't Shelvin Mack play for the Redclaws last year?



    and Brad Stevens at Butler

    [/QUOTE]

    Yeah. I'm watching Atlanta's broadcast of the game, and they were talking about Stevens and Mack.

    [/QUOTE]


    Ahhh, I see

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: Cs vs hawks

    In response to Fierce34's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Mployee8's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    where are Doc and Austin Rivers when you need them ...

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Think about it, Mployee, if the last I was wrong was Austin Rivers to the Celts, that was 2 years ago.

     

    You on the other hand were just wrong a few days ago.

    [/QUOTE]


    think about this ... you're wrong every day as soon as you wake up!

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: Cs vs hawks

    alright guys ... you start another game thread, and I'll keep Fungus busy over here ... hahaha

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: Cs vs hawks

    Once again we are competitive for the 1st half ... maybe tonight we can play the entire game.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from DrBoogiebone. Show DrBoogiebone's posts

    Re: Cs vs hawks

    Atlanta won that 1/4.

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: Cs vs hawks

    In response to Fierce34's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Mployee8's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    Once again we are competitive for the 1st half ... maybe tonight we can play the entire game.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    If you've been paying attention, the Celts always lose in the 4th because the Celts don't have a go to guy like Paul Pierce.

     

    You're mentally challenged if you haven't figured that out.

    [/QUOTE]


    Pierce went 2-11 the other night ... get off the Keystone ... that was yesterday, today's a new day and Pierce is gone so slap yourself silly until you come out of your stupor ... Oops, forgot you can't do that due to imbecile status.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: Cs vs hawks

    In response to Fierce34's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Don't worry guys, the next Big 3 Spencer Hawes, Gordon Hayward, and Anthony Morrow will be walking through that door soon, according to Mployee8.

    HAHAHA

    [/QUOTE]


    beats a few ping pong balls bouncing around with no absolutes other than unpredictability.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: Cs vs hawks

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    In response to Mployee8's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

     

    Pierce went 2-11 the other night ... get off the Keystone ... that was yesterday, today's a new day and Pierce is gone so slap yourself silly until you come out of your stupor ... Oops, forgot you can't do that due to imbecile status.

     



    Did I mean the Paul Pierce of today?

     

    In case you forgot, because your short term memory always lets you down, I was one of the first who said Pierce will not be a Celtic this season.

     

    Again, the Celts are always going to lose in the 4th because they don't have a go to guy like Kobe or Lebron.

    Get it?

    [/QUOTE]


    It won't be that way forever ... Get off it (PP) and look forward to the next go to guy ... Jeesh!

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from shines01. Show shines01's posts

    Re: Cs vs hawks

    Sullinger!

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: Cs vs hawks

    In response to Fierce34's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Mployee8's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

     

    beats a few ping pong balls bouncing around with no absolutes other than unpredictability.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    You're a bigger fool that I thought.

     

    Basically what you're telling us is that you prefer the Celtics be mediocre forever.

    Stupid idea!

    [/QUOTE]


    No, I prefer getting the best player we can in the lottery or combining picks to move up to get that guy. Then using our TPE in a S&T or FA signing and trading the other assets for upgrades until we are a contender ... that could take 2-3 years overall but you have to start somewhere and a center like Hawes is a good starting point. I only have interest in Hayward if he can be had for $8-10/yr otherwise let PHO or UT have him. That means I might consider trading Green for Hayward or another combo of pick and player that's my limit.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from shines01. Show shines01's posts

    Re: Cs vs hawks

    yes Dave, that was a bit excessive

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: Cs vs hawks

    BTW Fungus .... 59-59 HAHAHA ... Go C'ssssssssssssssssssss

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from DrBoogiebone. Show DrBoogiebone's posts

    Re: Cs vs hawks

    Sully says "respect my authority!"

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from DrBoogiebone. Show DrBoogiebone's posts

    Re: Cs vs hawks


    (sigh)..... here comes the TO's.

     

Share