Re: How to identify a hater
posted at 10/5/2013 11:17 PM EDT
In response to puddinpuddin's comment:
The burden of proof is on YOU, since you make the charges, not on Karl who defends BDC posters against your criticisms.
Each/every BDC poster is unworthy of your charges unless/until you can make it stick.
You have access to the archives.... so dig in.... make your case.... do your homework...and good luck.
Actually, Pud - You are wrong. I made no such "charges". First, I have not accused anyone here of being a "hater". I have merely offered some criteria by which haters could be identified, one of which is that they are unable to recognize any positive aspects of the object of their dislike. Karliost then EMPHATICALLY asserted that their were NO posters here who don't recognize some of the positive aspects of Rondo's game. 'NONE' he said. I expressed doubt that such was the case, and suggested that I would accept as proof of his assertion his showing where some of those who others might label as 'haters' had in fact pointed out some of Rondo's strengths. I wasn't asking a great deal - a few such instances would have sufficed.
YOU are asserting that it's up to me to prove my doubt - a logical impossibility, as a moment of thought would make clear.
I commend your attempt to come to the aid of another poster, although why you felt he needed your help is a mystery to me. Unfortunately, you have badly misinterpreted the exchange of posts, making your attempt unsuccessful. You could, however, rectify your error by helping Karliost with researching the posts of those few who - by their intemperate reactions - have shown that they may meet the criteria I have advanced. So, dig in, do your homework, and good luck.
By the way, what posters was Karliost "defending"? And from what was he defending them?