Re: How would you feel about Paul ending his career with the Lakers?
posted at 5/8/2013 2:17 PM EDT
In response to Red-16Russ-11's comment:
Smarting would mean I lost the argument...................how can I be smarting when I've proven my point over and over and over and over and over.........again??????
See, you are smarting again.
You prove it with what? unless there is an alternate universe you have NO WAY to prove it, because the premise is not true.
Your attempt to use A->B to prove that !A->!B is not the logic we commonly know. It's something you create.
Once again, reflection and deflection for a person who can't admit his team is 2nd best, his coach is 2nd best, and Gasol was stolen by the lakers, who didn't have a legit center, to play CENTER in 2008 AFTER the injury to Bynum................NONE of these points are in question, and you have yet to prove otherwise![/QUOTE]
And this is not the argument here. When you can't prove your baby "Had Bynum not injured -> would not have acquired Gasol", you always have to resort to its inverse "Bynum injured -> acquired Gasol".
See your flaw?
Do you really think "Bynum not injured -> not acquired Gasol" and "Bynum injured -> acquired Gasol" are equivalent?
response due in 10 mins, starting now!![/QUOTE]
See, when the argument is nonsense, better try this cheap stunt.