Jeff Green is not good at the 4

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

     

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    FACTS WE KNEW:

    1. Green gave up more than he was giving when playing at the 4

    2. SF seemed his most natural position

    3. He was still growing as a player and could get better at both positions

    4. He is NOT a SG

     




    Green would be best at the 2.

     

    He could defend the 2 and he would overpower other 2s.

    Do you really think Lee and Terry are better than Green?

     



    Kirk.

     

    Green is 6 foot 9.  He has never played the 2 in his lfe.

    What are you talking about?



    Bingo

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

    At this point our starting lineup should be Bradley, Green, Pierce, KG, and Wilcox.

    It will never happen though.

    Doc Rivers plays favorites with his players.

    He let little Rondo ruin the first half of our season.



    If that is our starting 5 then Pierce will guard SG's and Green forwards, didn't you see my post where I showed you Pierce guarding Dudley, Matthews and Iggy the last 3 games when on the court with Green and Jeff guarded Scola, Morris, Batum, Aldridge and Manimal?

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    So we have Golden State next... Green on Steph Curry right?

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    And no I didn't catch last nights game... but I was AT the Denver and Phoenix games, and WATCHED the Lakers and Blazers games and Green did not spend most of his time guarding Kobe, Dudley, Matthews and Iguadala... Pierce did. Green guarded Artest, Clark, Manimal, Scola, Morris, Aldridge and Batum... like he should be doing.  

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Ortiz123. Show Ortiz123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    FACTS WE KNEW:

    1. Green gave up more than he was giving when playing at the 4

    2. SF seemed his most natural position

    3. He was still growing as a player and could get better at both positions

    4. He is NOT a SG

     




    Green would be best at the 2.

     

    He could defend the 2 and he would overpower other 2s.

    Do you really think Lee and Terry are better than Green?




    Yes, terry has a better shot and Lee defends better...They both have a better handle too..

    Green is a SF like PP...Terry is sg in a pt body..

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Ortiz123. Show Ortiz123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    FACTS WE KNEW:

    1. Green gave up more than he was giving when playing at the 4

    2. SF seemed his most natural position

    3. He was still growing as a player and could get better at both positions

    4. He is NOT a SG

     




    Green would be best at the 2.

     

    He could defend the 2 and he would overpower other 2s.

    Do you really think Lee and Terry are better than Green?




    When he can handle and shoot like PP, Koby, or Lebrains, then he can play the two..

    But then, he still will be better at the three...

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Ortiz123. Show Ortiz123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to rameakap's comment:

    So we have Golden State next... Green on Steph Curry right?




    like to see that..on second thought..nooooooooo!

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from snakeoil123. Show snakeoil123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    K cool kirk

    Green will be the first 6 9 guard who has never played guard in the history of the NBA.

    We all agree with you.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from snakeoil123. Show snakeoil123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    Youre completely right. you know more about Green then any guy that has ever coached him.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from tomobo. Show tomobo's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

    In response to concord27's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to postal5's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

     

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    FACTS WE KNEW:

    1. Green gave up more than he was giving when playing at the 4

    2. SF seemed his most natural position

    3. He was still growing as a player and could get better at both positions

    4. He is NOT a SG

     




    Green would be best at the 2.

     

    He could defend the 2 and he would overpower other 2s.

    Do you really think Lee and Terry are better than Green?

     



    Kirk.

     

    Green is 6 foot 9.  He has never played the 2 in his lfe.

    What are you talking about?

     


    Jeff would play 3 on offense while Pierce plays 3.  On D, Jeff covers taller 2's and Paul stays on his usual 3 cover.

     

     



    Why can't Green get minutes at the 3 and the 4 like he always has his entire high school. college and pro career?

     

    He isn't a 2.  

     



    Kirk & Concord should have a beer summit in which each of them spews inanities @ each other until they slowly ease toward drowning themselves in the pitcher placed before them. I'll give them a pass on other topics but jeez...

     

     



    What are you talking about?  Regarding Green I have said only he should start.  As far as other inanities I am probably guilty.  That is what this board is about.  You seem to avoid scrutiny here are you that knowledgeable.  Kirk is repetitive but has point of view.  I don't know where I fall but you just don't seem that consequential yourself.  I cannot put my finger on you having any opinion at all.  

     

     



    He writes about Rondo's cup a lot.

     




    I see that I still loom large in your mental landscape(writer of letters' and such). You'll never be over me. I see that now. HA HA HA

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    Youre completely right. you know more about Green then any guy that has ever coached him.

     




    In case you have not noticed, most coaches have no imagination whatsoever.

     

    But I will give Rivers credit, he does occasionally play Green and Pierce at the 2 and the 3. I just wish he would close games like that.

     



    As already pointed out to you, when he plays PP and JG in games together, Pierce guards wings and Green guards forwards, so how you make the leap to saying Green is the SG and Pierce the Sf is beyong me. I didn't see the Utah game, but in the Denver, LA, Portland and Phoenix games Green was the SF or PF when on the court with PP, NOT the SG.

    What snake is saying is true. Every coach from high school on up has played Jeff at forward. OKC has a pretty good coach and they TRADED Jeff b/c there was no room for him behind Durant and Ibaka as soon as Ibaka proved a better 4 than him.

    There are many examples in the NBA of guys who were athletes and undersized PF's, but good sized SF's (Larry Johnson, Shawn Kemp, Luol Deng) never known for being defensive forces... and nobody said "hey let's make this 6'8" guy a shooting guard"

    Give it up Kirk

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from Ortiz123. Show Ortiz123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    K cool kirk

    Green will be the first 6 9 guard who has never played guard in the history of the NBA.

    We all agree with you.

     



    Thanks for proving my point.

     

    He is bigger and can overpower people at the 2. Doc keeps playing him there for short periods and we do well. Let's do it for a longer time. KG, Bass, Pierce, Green, and Bradley.

     




    Why not Kg at the two...he would over power them too...common Kirk..

    Im not saying he can't do it  it on occasions, but he is not that quick...Koby can, Lebrons on certain occasion too...Green is not that quick...they will get him in foul trouble...Yes, on offense, he can over power them, but at the other end, we will pay for it..PP would be better for that...Lee also..Lee is a very good defender...at the two..he has trouble with the fast points...

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from Ortiz123. Show Ortiz123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    Plus he is to inconsistant with the mid range jumper...not saying he can't improve..Lebrons did..

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    Kirk, I was at 2 of the last 5 games, I watched 2 of the other 3, Pierce guarded the SHOOTING GUARD, Green guarded the forward.

    Yes Manimal and Batum may be the quickest guys on their team... but they are forwards, like the other examples I gave, when Green is on the floor with Pierce he is the SF-PF and Pierce the SG-SF... if he played SG it was only for brief stints of time

    6'9" 26 year olds who have been forwards their entire life don't magically become SG's simply b/c their PER at PF is mediocre. This team has FIVE SG's worthy of being in the rotation already. Green is still a better PF than Bass or Wilcox.

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    Kirk, I was at 2 of the last 5 games, I watched 2 of the other 3, Pierce guarded the SHOOTING GUARD, Green guarded the forward.

    Yes Manimal and Batum may be the quickest guys on their team... but they are forwards, like the other examples I gave, when Green is on the floor with Pierce he is the SF-PF and Pierce the SG-SF... if he played SG it was only for brief stints of time

    6'9" 26 year olds who have been forwards their entire life don't magically become SG's simply b/c their PER at PF is mediocre. This team has FIVE SG's worthy of being in the rotation already. Green is still a better PF than Bass or Wilcox.

     



    Green covers Lebron and Kobe very well.

     

    He is quick enough.



    Yup, I'm fine with him guarding 6'8" 260lb bullrusher SF-PF LeBron and 34 year old Kobe, doesn't make him a SG just b/c Pierce is on Battier or Artest during those times.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from snakeoil123. Show snakeoil123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to tomobo's comment:

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to concord27's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to postal5's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

     

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    FACTS WE KNEW:

    1. Green gave up more than he was giving when playing at the 4

    2. SF seemed his most natural position

    3. He was still growing as a player and could get better at both positions

    4. He is NOT a SG

     




    Green would be best at the 2.

     

    He could defend the 2 and he would overpower other 2s.

    Do you really think Lee and Terry are better than Green?

     



    Kirk.

     

    Green is 6 foot 9.  He has never played the 2 in his lfe.

    What are you talking about?

     


    Jeff would play 3 on offense while Pierce plays 3.  On D, Jeff covers taller 2's and Paul stays on his usual 3 cover.

     

     



    Why can't Green get minutes at the 3 and the 4 like he always has his entire high school. college and pro career?

     

    He isn't a 2.  

     



    Kirk & Concord should have a beer summit in which each of them spews inanities @ each other until they slowly ease toward drowning themselves in the pitcher placed before them. I'll give them a pass on other topics but jeez...

     

     



    What are you talking about?  Regarding Green I have said only he should start.  As far as other inanities I am probably guilty.  That is what this board is about.  You seem to avoid scrutiny here are you that knowledgeable.  Kirk is repetitive but has point of view.  I don't know where I fall but you just don't seem that consequential yourself.  I cannot put my finger on you having any opinion at all.  

     

     



    He writes about Rondo's cup a lot.

     

     




    I see that I still loom large in your mental landscape(writer of letters' and such). You'll never be over me. I see that now. HA HA HA

     

    I own it. I like making fun of you.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from tomobo. Show tomobo's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to concord27's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to postal5's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

     

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    FACTS WE KNEW:

    1. Green gave up more than he was giving when playing at the 4

    2. SF seemed his most natural position

    3. He was still growing as a player and could get better at both positions

    4. He is NOT a SG

     




    Green would be best at the 2.

     

    He could defend the 2 and he would overpower other 2s.

    Do you really think Lee and Terry are better than Green?

     



    Kirk.

     

    Green is 6 foot 9.  He has never played the 2 in his lfe.

    What are you talking about?

     


    Jeff would play 3 on offense while Pierce plays 3.  On D, Jeff covers taller 2's and Paul stays on his usual 3 cover.

     

     



    Why can't Green get minutes at the 3 and the 4 like he always has his entire high school. college and pro career?

     

    He isn't a 2.  

     



    Kirk & Concord should have a beer summit in which each of them spews inanities @ each other until they slowly ease toward drowning themselves in the pitcher placed before them. I'll give them a pass on other topics but jeez...

     

     



    What are you talking about?  Regarding Green I have said only he should start.  As far as other inanities I am probably guilty.  That is what this board is about.  You seem to avoid scrutiny here are you that knowledgeable.  Kirk is repetitive but has point of view.  I don't know where I fall but you just don't seem that consequential yourself.  I cannot put my finger on you having any opinion at all.  

     

     



    He writes about Rondo's cup a lot.

     

     




    I see that I still loom large in your mental landscape(writer of letters' and such). You'll never be over me. I see that now. HA HA HA

     

     

     

    I own it. I like making fun of you.




    Consider yourself owned. Again

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from snakeoil123. Show snakeoil123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to tomobo's comment:

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to concord27's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to postal5's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

     

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    FACTS WE KNEW:

    1. Green gave up more than he was giving when playing at the 4

    2. SF seemed his most natural position

    3. He was still growing as a player and could get better at both positions

    4. He is NOT a SG

     




    Green would be best at the 2.

     

    He could defend the 2 and he would overpower other 2s.

    Do you really think Lee and Terry are better than Green?

     



    Kirk.

     

    Green is 6 foot 9.  He has never played the 2 in his lfe.

    What are you talking about?

     


    Jeff would play 3 on offense while Pierce plays 3.  On D, Jeff covers taller 2's and Paul stays on his usual 3 cover.

     

     



    Why can't Green get minutes at the 3 and the 4 like he always has his entire high school. college and pro career?

     

    He isn't a 2.  

     



    Kirk & Concord should have a beer summit in which each of them spews inanities @ each other until they slowly ease toward drowning themselves in the pitcher placed before them. I'll give them a pass on other topics but jeez...

     

     



    What are you talking about?  Regarding Green I have said only he should start.  As far as other inanities I am probably guilty.  That is what this board is about.  You seem to avoid scrutiny here are you that knowledgeable.  Kirk is repetitive but has point of view.  I don't know where I fall but you just don't seem that consequential yourself.  I cannot put my finger on you having any opinion at all.  

     

     



    He writes about Rondo's cup a lot.

     

     




    I see that I still loom large in your mental landscape(writer of letters' and such). You'll never be over me. I see that now. HA HA HA

     

     

     

    I own it. I like making fun of you.

     




    Consider yourself owned. Again

     



    Yeah. Wow. What a burn. 

    I mock you, then you say "wow I sure am in your head ahahah"

    You're a true internet warrior.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from tomobo. Show tomobo's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to concord27's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to postal5's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

     

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    FACTS WE KNEW:

    1. Green gave up more than he was giving when playing at the 4

    2. SF seemed his most natural position

    3. He was still growing as a player and could get better at both positions

    4. He is NOT a SG

     




    Green would be best at the 2.

     

    He could defend the 2 and he would overpower other 2s.

    Do you really think Lee and Terry are better than Green?

     



    Kirk.

     

    Green is 6 foot 9.  He has never played the 2 in his lfe.

    What are you talking about?

     


    Jeff would play 3 on offense while Pierce plays 3.  On D, Jeff covers taller 2's and Paul stays on his usual 3 cover.

     

     



    Why can't Green get minutes at the 3 and the 4 like he always has his entire high school. college and pro career?

     

    He isn't a 2.  

     



    Kirk & Concord should have a beer summit in which each of them spews inanities @ each other until they slowly ease toward drowning themselves in the pitcher placed before them. I'll give them a pass on other topics but jeez...

     

     



    What are you talking about?  Regarding Green I have said only he should start.  As far as other inanities I am probably guilty.  That is what this board is about.  You seem to avoid scrutiny here are you that knowledgeable.  Kirk is repetitive but has point of view.  I don't know where I fall but you just don't seem that consequential yourself.  I cannot put my finger on you having any opinion at all.  

     

     



    He writes about Rondo's cup a lot.

     

     




    I see that I still loom large in your mental landscape(writer of letters' and such). You'll never be over me. I see that now. HA HA HA

     

     

     

    I own it. I like making fun of you.

     




    Consider yourself owned. Again

     

     



    Yeah. Wow. What a burn. 

     

    I mock you, then you say "wow I sure am in your head ahahah"

    You're a true internet warrior.



    Look who pops up @ the sound of my bell. Rondo's Dawg. You've picked up the mantle of the cup quite well. Why? Because it hurt you beyond all measure. You're so transparent that you're an honorary white man. Congratulations! You've finally achieved. Now get to writing something of merit(writer of letters' and such)...

     

Share