kings offer

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    kings offer

    http://www.celticsblog.com/2014/2/17/5421126/nba-trade-rumor-kings-offered-trade-package-for-rajon-rondo

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: kings offer

    In response to TheBigTicket05's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    http://www.celticsblog.com/2014/2/17/5421126/nba-trade-rumor-kings-offered-trade-package-for-rajon-rondo

    [/QUOTE]


    Check my Trade Rumors thread for the original trade rumor as reported in 12/2013

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Fiercy. Show Fiercy's posts

    Re: kings offer

    In response to Mployee8's comment:

     

    Check my Trade Rumors thread for the original trade rumor as reported in 12/2013



    Why should we check your thread?

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from Fiercy. Show Fiercy's posts

    Re: kings offer

    TheBigTicket also has the right to make a thread about Rondo to the Kings, right?

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from Ortiz123. Show Ortiz123's posts

    Re: kings offer

    Were the two picks first rounders??

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Fiercy. Show Fiercy's posts

    Re: kings offer

    In response to Ortiz123's comment:

    Were the two picks first rounders??



    Spears doesn't elaborate on whether the two picks offered were first-rounders or second rounders.

    http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2014/2/17/5421106/nba-trade-rumors-rajon-rondo-ben-mclemore-isaiah-thomas

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from fbombfury. Show fbombfury's posts

    Re: kings offer

    In response to Ortiz123's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Were the two picks first rounders??

    [/QUOTE]
    No, 2nd and 3rd......Enjoy!

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Ortiz123. Show Ortiz123's posts

    Re: kings offer

    or maybe a fourth rounder for Nash...

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: kings offer

    In response to Fiercy's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Mployee8's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

     

    Check my Trade Rumors thread for the original trade rumor as reported in 12/2013

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Why should we check your thread?

     

    [/QUOTE]


    Because I posted the link dating back to Dec 13' with the original trade offer that was blown off based on the source.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Fiercy. Show Fiercy's posts

    Re: kings offer

    In response to Mployee8's comment:

     

    Because I posted the link dating back to Dec 13' with the original trade offer that was blown off based on the source.



    Totally clueless.

     

     

    I keep telling you and you keep denying it!

    Who would want to believe you when everything you post ends up being wrong!

     

    The posters here already learned their lesson when you said you know Ainge was keeping Kris Joseph.

    Or the Celts will sign Chris Babb to a 10-day contract because AB is hurt.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: kings offer

    That post provides a link ... it's not my opinion like most of the factless posts you make here.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from Fiercy. Show Fiercy's posts

    Re: kings offer

    In response to Mployee8's comment:

    That post provides a link ... it's not my opinion like most of the factless posts you make here.



    Like I said, why would we need to check out your thread when this thread will suffice.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: kings offer

    Because the new report is just a rehash of an old offer nearly two months old ... Get It?

    It's BS republished to sell some newspapers or get internet hits to enhance ratings all for the enticement of advertising $.

    There's nothing new here unless you can prove this is an entirely new offer since the original rumor from Dec 2013 .... You're wasting your time on yesterdays rumor but go ahead.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from Fiercy. Show Fiercy's posts

    Re: kings offer

    In response to Mployee8's comment:

    Because the new report is just a rehash of an old offer nearly two months old ... Get It?

    It's BS republished to sell some newspapers or get internet hits to enhance ratings all for the enticement of advertising $.

    There's nothing new here unless you can prove this is an entirely new offer since the original rumor from Dec 2013 .... You're wasting your time on yesterdays rumor but go ahead.



    It's not about wasting time on yesterday's rumors, it's about we don't want your thread. 

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: kings offer

    In response to Fiercy's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Mployee8's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    Because the new report is just a rehash of an old offer nearly two months old ... Get It?

    It's BS republished to sell some newspapers or get internet hits to enhance ratings all for the enticement of advertising $.

    There's nothing new here unless you can prove this is an entirely new offer since the original rumor from Dec 2013 .... You're wasting your time on yesterdays rumor but go ahead.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    It's not about wasting time on yesterday's rumors, it's about we don't want your thread. 

     

    [/QUOTE]


    You don't want my thread ya mean ... but you keep posting there so thanks for the added exposure .... Hahaha!!!

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from Fiercy. Show Fiercy's posts

    Re: kings offer

    In response to Mployee8's comment:

     

    You don't want my thread ya mean ... but you keep posting there so thanks for the added exposure .... Hahaha!!!



    I'm not the only one who doesn't want your thread.

    Didn't TheBigTicket make this thread?

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from Fiercy. Show Fiercy's posts

    Re: kings offer

    Mployee

     

    You're known for lying and jumping the gun.

    That's why when you make a thread, it easily gets forgotten.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: kings offer

    Easily gets forgotten ... like this?  

    http://boston.com/community/forums/sports/celtics/on-the-front-burner/asking-price-for-gordon-hayward/100/7007142

     

    Nobody took the bait?

     

    Poor FIERCY .... Nothing but

     

     

     

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from Fiercy. Show Fiercy's posts

    Re: kings offer

    So you were on that thread?

    Why didn't you post anything?

    HAHAHA

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: kings offer

    Posters like myself and Mployee mentioned 2 months back that this Kings offer could be out there and stay out there up until the deadline.

    I would take McLemore, Thomas and the Kings 1st rd pick, even with top 3 protection for Rondo.

    If the pick lands top 3 I'd say the compensation is their 2nd round pick, unprotected picks in 2015 and 2017 and the right to swap either of our two 1st round picks in 2016 for Rondo.

    The Celtics would have to take back the yucky Marcus Thornton contract and not be able to dump Wallace in such a deal though.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: kings offer

    Rame ... don't feed his Hayward thread after he bumped it cuz I gave him the crickets!

    He's just trying to turn that loser into a winner ... don't feed the chump.

     

     

    • Mployee8
    • Posts: 8632
    • First: 7/8/2008
    • Last: 2/18/2014

    Easily gets forgotten ... like this?  

    http://boston.com/community/forums/sports/celtics/on-the-front-burner/asking-price-for-gordon-hayward/100/7007142

     

    Nobody took the bait?

     

    Poor FIERCY .... Nothing but

     

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: kings offer

    In response to Mployee8's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Rame ... don't feed his Hayward thread after he bumped it cuz I gave him the crickets!

    He's just trying to turn that loser into a winner ... don't feed the chump.

     

     

    • Mployee8
    • Posts: 8632
    • First: 7/8/2008
    • Last: 2/18/2014

    Easily gets forgotten ... like this?  

    http://boston.com/community/forums/sports/celtics/on-the-front-burner/asking-price-for-gordon-hayward/100/7007142

     

    Nobody took the bait?

     

    Poor FIERCY .... Nothing but

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Fiercy's Hayward thread proves my points. He can leave it there all he wants. He's WRONG AGAIN!

    If Fiercy agrees Ainge would likely take ONE first round pick, even outside the lotto, for Bradley rather than overpay him 8 million when he wants to give him 6, why wouldn't the Jazz take TWO first round picks, one in the 18-21 range in a deep draft and the other possibly in the 5-12 range in the lotto next year if they don't want to give Hayward 12m when he is worth 10 to them?

    Fiercy loses again. Hahahaha

    Joel Anthony and two 1st round picks for Hayward can be argued as being VERY fair compensation for a restricted free agent beginning to show his value at the Jeff Green 4/36 contract to be a 4th banana on a winner.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from Fiercy. Show Fiercy's posts

    Re: kings offer

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    Fiercy's Hayward thread proves my points. He can leave it there all he wants. He's WRONG AGAIN!

    If Fiercy agrees Ainge would likely take ONE first round pick, even outside the lotto, for Bradley rather than overpay him 8 million when he wants to give him 6, why wouldn't the Jazz take TWO first round picks, one in the 18-21 range in a deep draft and the other possibly in the 5-12 range in the lotto next year if they don't want to give Hayward 12m when he is worth 10 to them?

    Fiercy loses again. Hahahaha

    Joel Anthony and two 1st round picks for Hayward can be argued as being VERY fair compensation for a restricted free agent beginning to show his value at the Jeff Green 4/36 contract to be a 4th banana on a winner.



    VERY fair?

    Really?

     

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: kings offer

    In response to Fiercy's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to rameakap's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

     

    Fiercy's Hayward thread proves my points. He can leave it there all he wants. He's WRONG AGAIN!

    If Fiercy agrees Ainge would likely take ONE first round pick, even outside the lotto, for Bradley rather than overpay him 8 million when he wants to give him 6, why wouldn't the Jazz take TWO first round picks, one in the 18-21 range in a deep draft and the other possibly in the 5-12 range in the lotto next year if they don't want to give Hayward 12m when he is worth 10 to them?

    Fiercy loses again. Hahahaha

    Joel Anthony and two 1st round picks for Hayward can be argued as being VERY fair compensation for a restricted free agent beginning to show his value at the Jeff Green 4/36 contract to be a 4th banana on a winner.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    VERY fair?

     

    Really?

     

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    [/QUOTE]


    Yes

    VERY fair

    I proved it

    'HAHAHA' proves nothing

    That is why I win and you lose OVER and OVER

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from kdp59. Show kdp59's posts

    Re: kings offer

    well the board was OK for a coulpe minutes there...now I see we're bacl to the ame old trolling.

     

    CALLING THE MODS....PLEASE BAN ANYONE WHO TROLLS FORM POSTING HERE FOREVER.

     

    give the rest of us a break please!

     

     

     

Share