Knicks vs. Celtics

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from ktronic. Show ktronic's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    In response to 37stories' comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Green is the same guy he always was.  A good third or 4th option.

    [/QUOTE]

    Not if he doesn't shoot.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from 37stories. Show 37stories's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    In response to ktronic's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to 37stories' comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Green is the same guy he always was.  A good third or 4th option.

    [/QUOTE]

    Not if he doesn't shoot.

    [/QUOTE]

    Which was my point. He doesn't want the ball.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    Finally someone took it to the hoop!

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from ktronic. Show ktronic's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    In response to 37stories' comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ktronic's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to 37stories' comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Green is the same guy he always was.  A good third or 4th option.

    [/QUOTE]

    Not if he doesn't shoot.

    [/QUOTE]

    Which was my point. He doesn't want the ball.

    [/QUOTE]

    Yup

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from mossad-did-911. Show mossad-did-911's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    only tanking by one point now

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from mossad-did-911. Show mossad-did-911's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    Bradley for the lead!!!!!! NY tanking by 2 points!!

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Bradley for the lead!!!!!! NY tanking by 2 points!!

    [/QUOTE]

    You mean Nuggets tanking by 2 - they own the Knicks 1st round pick in June! 

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from mossad-did-911. Show mossad-did-911's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    FAVERANI!!!!!! looking like a young KG!!!!!

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    Vitor giving the team good minutes tonight! 

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from mossad-did-911. Show mossad-did-911's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    In response to BCSP's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Bradley for the lead!!!!!! NY tanking by 2 points!!

    [/QUOTE]

    You mean Nuggets tanking by 2 - they own the Knicks 1st round pick in June! 

    [/QUOTE]

    yeah but it goes against the Knicks record so they are tanking right now. losing = tanking.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from ktronic. Show ktronic's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    FAVERANI!!!!!! looking like a young KG!!!!!

    [/QUOTE]


     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to BCSP's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Bradley for the lead!!!!!! NY tanking by 2 points!!

    [/QUOTE]

    You mean Nuggets tanking by 2 - they own the Knicks 1st round pick in June! 

    [/QUOTE]

    yeah but it goes against the Knicks record so they are tanking right now. losing = tanking.

    [/QUOTE]

    I was just poking at the Knicks! The only NBA franchise that can screw up tanking! Pathetic!!!!

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from ktronic. Show ktronic's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    In response to ktronic's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to 37stories' comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ktronic's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to 37stories' comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Green is the same guy he always was.  A good third or 4th option.

    [/QUOTE]

    Not if he doesn't shoot.

    [/QUOTE]

    Which was my point. He doesn't want the ball.

    [/QUOTE]

    Yup

    [/QUOTE]

    Like I was saying, Jeff Greens is the man!!!

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    Cue fat lady!! Sing baby sing!!!! 

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from mossad-did-911. Show mossad-did-911's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    11-14!!!! Celtics Pride!!!! Championship!!!! who needs a top 5 pick when you play in the worst division in the NBA????? wooooo hoooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    Green scores on an old PP play for the last shot and makes it  ... how fitting, hey Fungus?

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from ktronic. Show ktronic's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    In response to BCSP's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to BCSP's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Bradley for the lead!!!!!! NY tanking by 2 points!!

    [/QUOTE]

    You mean Nuggets tanking by 2 - they own the Knicks 1st round pick in June! 

    [/QUOTE]

    yeah but it goes against the Knicks record so they are tanking right now. losing = tanking.

    [/QUOTE]

    I was just poking at the Knicks! The only NBA franchise that can screw up tanking! Pathetic!!!!

    [/QUOTE]

    Do feel sorry for Woodson though. (but he's not wearing green so the H...with him)

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    Fungus getting out all the old accts this week ...

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from mossad-did-911. Show mossad-did-911's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    Danny needs to make a move. Boston is only one piece away from a .500 record. yeah! this is so exciting. 

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from ktronic. Show ktronic's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ktronic's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ktronic's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ktronic's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ktronic's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    why do these guys keep talking about tanking? are they that dumb, or are they being told to make these idiot illogical things? 

    "Staudemire is the leading scorer out of the 2002 draft class and he was taken 9th overall, for all you "tankers"." -Mike Gorman

    WTH is this guy talking about? what is he saying? is Staudemire that good, or was that draft class that bad? and what does that have to do with this year? 

    there is a big difference between hoping your team loses and wanting your team to lose on purpose. 

     

    [/QUOTE]

    He was the NINTH pick. Thats his point!

     

    [/QUOTE]

    ok, and what does that have to do with tanking?

    [/QUOTE]

    It means you don't necessarily have to Tank to get a great player.

    [/QUOTE]

    so amare staudemire is a great player now?

    [/QUOTE]

    No. But he was for several years. He's been hurt and it's toward the end so you can't compare what he is today with what he was. And that was not Mikes point. Again, he wasn't a top 5 pick but he turned out to be an All-Star.

    [/QUOTE]

    staudemire has NEVER been a great player in the NBA. this isn't 2002, and people have much higher expectations of the talent in the 2014 draft than Amare Staudemire. More importantly, that doesn't prove any point. the 9th pick is in the lottery, you've got lose (aka tank) to get the 9th worst record. the 9th worst team could even win the #1 pick.

    but i agree with your point. whether you end up with the 9th or 1st worst record after tanking, even if you get unlucky in the lottery, you can still possibly find an all-star caliber player in the back end of the lottery.

    [/QUOTE]

    And that basically was Gormans point.

    [/QUOTE]

    well what one is it? they aren't equal points, they are complete opposites. if he's saying that you don't need to tank in order to get an all-star caliber player then he would be taking an anti-tanking stand point. this, as i said earlier, is an irrational statement and doesn't support his "point". Manu Ginobili would be an ideal example to support that claim. since "tank" has come to replace the word "lose", then the opposite of tank is to win. if you're winning and not tanking then you should be in the playoffs. Ginobili is an example of a playoff team that didn't need a lottery pick to find an all-star, and unlike staudemire, a GREAT player.

    now, if his point is that even if you get unlucky in the lottery you can still find an all-star player in the back end of the lottery, then he would be taking a pro-tanking stance. in essence, he would be saying that tanking is good because even if you miss out on the top 5 pick you can still hit on a 6-13 pick. 

     

    my questions are rhetorical of course because it's obvious that Gorman was talking out of his @55 and made no sense at all. But i'm sure he'd appreciate your support.

     

     

    [/QUOTE]

    I give up. You don't get it.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from jdm894g. Show jdm894g's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Danny needs to make a move. Boston is only one piece away from a .500 record. yeah! this is so exciting. 

    [/QUOTE]


    Don't sound so happy!!!!!! 

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from mossad-did-911. Show mossad-did-911's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    In response to ktronic's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ktronic's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ktronic's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ktronic's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ktronic's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    why do these guys keep talking about tanking? are they that dumb, or are they being told to make these idiot illogical things? 

    "Staudemire is the leading scorer out of the 2002 draft class and he was taken 9th overall, for all you "tankers"." -Mike Gorman

    WTH is this guy talking about? what is he saying? is Staudemire that good, or was that draft class that bad? and what does that have to do with this year? 

    there is a big difference between hoping your team loses and wanting your team to lose on purpose. 

     

    [/QUOTE]

    He was the NINTH pick. Thats his point!

     

    [/QUOTE]

    ok, and what does that have to do with tanking?

    [/QUOTE]

    It means you don't necessarily have to Tank to get a great player.

    [/QUOTE]

    so amare staudemire is a great player now?

    [/QUOTE]

    No. But he was for several years. He's been hurt and it's toward the end so you can't compare what he is today with what he was. And that was not Mikes point. Again, he wasn't a top 5 pick but he turned out to be an All-Star.

    [/QUOTE]

    staudemire has NEVER been a great player in the NBA. this isn't 2002, and people have much higher expectations of the talent in the 2014 draft than Amare Staudemire. More importantly, that doesn't prove any point. the 9th pick is in the lottery, you've got lose (aka tank) to get the 9th worst record. the 9th worst team could even win the #1 pick.

    but i agree with your point. whether you end up with the 9th or 1st worst record after tanking, even if you get unlucky in the lottery, you can still possibly find an all-star caliber player in the back end of the lottery.

    [/QUOTE]

    And that basically was Gormans point.

    [/QUOTE]

    well what one is it? they aren't equal points, they are complete opposites. if he's saying that you don't need to tank in order to get an all-star caliber player then he would be taking an anti-tanking stand point. this, as i said earlier, is an irrational statement and doesn't support his "point". Manu Ginobili would be an ideal example to support that claim. since "tank" has come to replace the word "lose", then the opposite of tank is to win. if you're winning and not tanking then you should be in the playoffs. Ginobili is an example of a playoff team that didn't need a lottery pick to find an all-star, and unlike staudemire, a GREAT player.

    now, if his point is that even if you get unlucky in the lottery you can still find an all-star player in the back end of the lottery, then he would be taking a pro-tanking stance. in essence, he would be saying that tanking is good because even if you miss out on the top 5 pick you can still hit on a 6-13 pick. 

     

    my questions are rhetorical of course because it's obvious that Gorman was talking out of his @55 and made no sense at all. But i'm sure he'd appreciate your support.

     

     

    [/QUOTE]

    I give up. You don't get it.

    [/QUOTE]

    what is the "it" that i don't get? that you're as dumb as Gorman? i was trying to help you "get it" ya dope. LOL

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from 37stories. Show 37stories's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    11-14!!!! Celtics Pride!!!! Championship!!!! who needs a top 5 pick when you play in the worst division in the NBA????? wooooo hoooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    [/QUOTE]

    Why don't you just save some time and stop watching until the draft?

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from mossad-did-911. Show mossad-did-911's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    In response to jdm894g's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Danny needs to make a move. Boston is only one piece away from a .500 record. yeah! this is so exciting. 

    [/QUOTE]


    Don't sound so happy!!!!!! 

    [/QUOTE]

    Celtic Pride Baby!!! 

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from mossad-did-911. Show mossad-did-911's posts

    Re: Knicks vs. Celtics

    In response to 37stories' comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    11-14!!!! Celtics Pride!!!! Championship!!!! who needs a top 5 pick when you play in the worst division in the NBA????? wooooo hoooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    [/QUOTE]

    Why don't you just save some time and stop watching until the draft?

    [/QUOTE]

    is that rhetorical or do you actually want an answer?

     

Share