mini-MLE?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from wfdog. Show wfdog's posts

    mini-MLE?

    At this point I'm getting the feeling DA may just hold onto the MLE until the trade deadline. If that's the case, then this is probably the X-mas day team...  

    C-  JON, Wilcox, Stiemsma
    PF- KG, Bass, JJJ
    SF- PP, Green, Marquis
    SG- Ray, Moore, Sasha
    PG- Rondo, Dooling, Bradley 

    2011/12 moves:
    *Bass replaces BBD
    *Dooling replaces Delonte
    *Wilcox replaces Shaq
    *Stiemsa replaces Perk
    *Addition of 2 rookies

    What do you think?
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from BoylestonBB. Show BoylestonBB's posts

    Re: mini-MLE?

    I think what I have thought for a while, we have no depth at SG.  Are we expecting Ray to play 40 mins?  That said, this is not the time for a panic buy.  Maybe Dooling becomes a defacto 2.
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Petey62. Show Petey62's posts

    Re: mini-MLE?

    I agree, we have no depth at SG.  Well unless Moore blossoms, we're going to be in alot of trouble there.

    If we're looking to make Dooling a defacto 2 guard, I would have preferred a much more productive Delonte West who is also familiar with our offense and defensive rotations.  Oh well.
     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: mini-MLE?

    In Response to Re: mini-MLE?:
    [QUOTE]I agree, we have no depth at SG.  Well unless Moore blossoms, we're going to be in alot of trouble there. If we're looking to make Dooling a defacto 2 guard, I would have preferred a much more productive Delonte West who is also familiar with our offense and defensive rotations.  Oh well.
    Posted by Petey62[/QUOTE]

    Any S&T ideas for Crawford ... Will Atlanta take JO?
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from Red-16Russ-11. Show Red-16Russ-11's posts

    Re: mini-MLE?

    In Response to Re: mini-MLE?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: mini-MLE? : Any S&T ideas for Crawford ... Will Atlanta take JO?
    Posted by Mployee8[/QUOTE]

    We also have a couple of TPE's I believe......hey, we gave up Wafer not under contract, how about Krstic?
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: mini-MLE?

    In Response to Re: mini-MLE?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: mini-MLE? : We also have a couple of TPE's I believe......hey, we gave up Wafer not under contract, how about Krstic?
    Posted by Red-16Russ-11[/QUOTE]

    Spendt the big one on Wilcox ... last I checked we only had $1.5M
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from wfdog. Show wfdog's posts

    Re: mini-MLE?

    In Response to Re: mini-MLE?:
    [QUOTE]I agree, we have no depth at SG.  Well unless Moore blossoms, we're going to be in alot of trouble there. If we're looking to make Dooling a defacto 2 guard, I would have preferred a much more productive Delonte West who is also familiar with our offense and defensive rotations.  Oh well.
    Posted by Petey62[/QUOTE]
    Yeah, I bet Dooling will be playing some 2 guard with with Rondo or Bradley at the point.
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from BoylestonBB. Show BoylestonBB's posts

    Re: mini-MLE?

    In Response to Re: mini-MLE?:
    [QUOTE]I agree, we have no depth at SG.  Well unless Moore blossoms, we're going to be in alot of trouble there. If we're looking to make Dooling a defacto 2 guard, I would have preferred a much more productive Delonte West who is also familiar with our offense and defensive rotations.  Oh well.
    Posted by Petey62[/QUOTE]

    My concern with Moore is he is 6'3 or 6'4 and will get psoted up at will.  Being a rookie, the refs will give him no favours defending the post.
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from wfdog. Show wfdog's posts

    Re: mini-MLE?

    In Response to Re: mini-MLE?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: mini-MLE? : Any S&T ideas for Crawford ... Will Atlanta take JO?
    Posted by Mployee8[/QUOTE]
    I would be for it if DA is able to use the MLE to get more post help.
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: mini-MLE?

    In Response to Re: mini-MLE?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: mini-MLE? : I would be for it if DA is able to use the MLE to get more post help.
    Posted by wfdog[/QUOTE]

    That's my point ... If they can turn JO into Crawford then use the MLE for a Big we will be in descent shape ... not as good as getting David West but better.
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from proftom. Show proftom's posts

    Re: mini-MLE?

    SG not a problem, big three play 25-30 minutes per game. And the new guy plays 15 for Ray. What new guy? The new guy they pick up just before the start of the season. We don't know who he is yet, becasue he doesn't know who he is yet. He's some older player, lost a step, young kid replaces him, get cuts, yada yada, the new Celtics guy.  
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: mini-MLE?

    In Response to Re: mini-MLE?:
    [QUOTE]SG not a problem, big three play 25-30 minutes per game. And the new guy plays 15 for Ray. What new guy? The new guy they pick up just before the start of the season. We don't know who he is yet, becasue he doesn't know who he is yet. He's some older player, lost a step, young kid replaces him, get cuts, yada yada, the new Celtics guy.  
    Posted by proftom[/QUOTE]

    Haha ... the guy that gets waived to fit Paul or DH under the cap ... Like Brewer or Rudy Fernandez ... now there's a thought eh, Fierce?    LOL!!!
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: mini-MLE?

    In Response to Re: mini-MLE?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: mini-MLE? : Spendt the big one on Wilcox ... last I checked we only had $1.5M
    Posted by Mployee8[/QUOTE]

    Now I'm confused ... I read that Danny used the Daniels TE to acquire Wilcox. Now I see this: MLE

    A. Sherrod Blakely
    signed Chris Wilcox using the full mid-level. That means the C's have nothing but vet minimum contracts to offer.


    and while looking to verify I found this: Vet Minimum

    http://boston.sbnation.com/boston-celtics/2011/12/9/2624961/chris-wilcox-and-the-boston-celtics-agree-to-one-year-deal

    Anyone know for sure?
     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sev133. Show Sev133's posts

    Re: mini-MLE?

    used the TE to get dooling....again no mini mid level only vet min left
     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from wfdog. Show wfdog's posts

    Re: mini-MLE?

    In Response to Re: mini-MLE?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to mini-MLE? : The MLE was used up on Wilcox
    Posted by damfuno[/QUOTE]

    Still can't believe that bit of news DA sprung on us after practice today. No wonder Wilcox was so excited when the C's called him.
     

Share