Re: No Rondo until December could be rough
posted at 10/1/2013 1:02 AM EDT
In response to Karllost's comment:
In response to DrBoogiebone's comment:
In response to Karllost's comment:
Wow, did you actually criticize me for characterizing people and then go on to characterize me as a hate monger, etc all in the same paragraph??
My goodness, doesnt your hypocritical, phony self feel so special now..
NO. I didn't criticize you for "characterizing" people. I criticized you for "catagorizing" people into groups of those who adore, love, and cherish the ground Rondo walks on (is that extremist enough for you?), as opposed to those who dislike Rondo. As if it's either one extreme or the other with you. The "hate monger" comment was just to emphasize that point. No, I don't think of you as a hate monger. But I do think you have alot of negative outlooks on things. Hey, to each their own, different strokes for different folks, etc, etc. I'm not trying to change you or even suggest that you change your ways. With the exception of how you comment on others thoughts in a belittling fashion. Not cool.
I'll let the "hypocritical" comment slide. Coming from you, that's just comical. But explain to me how I'm "phony" exactly. Or are you just starting in with the name calling again?
Reading comprehension a problem?
You did criticize me for catagorizing people, then catagorized me as a hate monger, among other things.If you cant be objective and realize how hypocritical and phony that is, then I'm afraid educating you on the subject just isnt worth the trouble.
If you want to backpeddle now and claim you said that for "emphasis" but really didnt mean it...then maybe first you should stand up and admit you embellished and lied for the sake of fraudulently making your point to defend your hero Rondo.
Dude.... You have one warped and very twisted outlook on things. Too many head injuries? Here's a recap for you. Yes, I did criticized you for "CATAGORIZING" people. Not "CHARACTERIZING", which is what you said I did to you in an earlier post (which is not true). There is a difference, so get it right. One of us does need reading comprehension, and IT'S NOT ME! Go back and reread my posts to clarify it for you. You seem to have gotten lost along the way. Read, reread, then read it a 3rd time. It'll help you.
Here it is again for you, so pay attention this time: "Wow, did you actually criticize me for characterizing people and then go on to characterize me as a hate monger, etc all in the same paragraph??" - Karllost
"NO. I didn't criticize you for "characterizing" people. I criticized you for "catagorizing" people into groups of those who adore, love, and cherish the ground Rondo walks on (is that extremist enough for you?), as opposed to those who dislike Rondo." - DrBB
Did you get it now? for the 3rd time?
As for your claim that I'm "backpeddling"... dude, if you wanna think the worst of me, then go right ahead. I don't give a rats a**. At this point, I believe I could get more reasoning out of an insect then continuing this rant with the likes of your pea-brain. I mean, you're out there like Pluto dude (which doesn't even exist). In other words, YOU'RE GONE! Take note of your post. That's the negative outlook I was talkin about. If I had to get "educated" by you, it would set me back about 40 years. You're too judgemental, and your final analysis couldn't hit water if it fell out of a boat. Now take my 2 cents and go buy a clue.