potential destination for GW & humph

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: potential destination for GW & humph

    In response to Fierce34's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Mployee8's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    Hahaha ... That's like the time you said "What would we do with David West, we already have KG at PF. You think the C's are gonna pay him all that $ as a backup to KG? And why would West want to be just a backup?  KG can't play Center!"  

    How'd that go? Sure Bird swiped West out from under us but KG ended up being one of the best centers we've had the last decade. Way to go ... another judgement made based on what, your personal opinion as was the case with KG? And you make an absolute statement as though others here are suppose to accept what you say based on your outstanding record of Fakir Fungus Fabled Faux Pas?  Hahaha ... sure, Fungus is the last word in player analysis and position assignments in the NBA ... Who needs Danny Ainge or Brad Stevens .... LOL!!!  

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Mployee

     

    1. David West never became a Celtic.

    2. We didn't get to the Finals with KG at Center.

    3. You don't have to accept what I say, but until now Monroe is still NOT a Celtic.

     

    For the record, Mployee, are you saying Greg Monroe will become a Celtic this season?

    [/QUOTE]


    1. Irrelevant

    2. Irrelevant

    3. Irrelevant

     

    For the record, asking me if Monroe will become a Celtic is IRRELEVANT. You have no evidence that Monroe can't play center other than how many blocks he had while there. Irrelevant ... You're Irrelevant!

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Re: potential destination for GW & humph

    Apparently Gerald Wallace's destination is Turnover Hell.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Russell1. Show Russell1's posts

    Re: potential destination for GW & humph

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Apparently Gerald Wallace's destination is Turnover Hell.

    [/QUOTE]

    Trading gw and hump for admare works contract wise. Itwould aquire a center who maybe able to play limitedminutes. It would get rid of a pf and a three year contract. It would allow celtics to give a max contract to rondo at the time of admares expiring contract. Not a great trafe but maybe a good move by danny.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Re: potential destination for GW & humph

    Gerald Wallace isn't going anywhere.

    He is a bad player with a bad contract.

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Re: potential destination for GW & humph

    In response to Fierce34's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    Gerald Wallace isn't going anywhere.

    He is a bad player with a bad contract.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    That's why trade Bass and Lee instead.

     

    The Celts have 3 contracts that they should get rid of, GW's, Lee's, and Bass'.

    If the Celts can get rid of the 2 then that's good enough.

    [/QUOTE]

    Hoopshype says the Cs would trade Wallace and Humphries for Andre Stoudemire to get rid of Wallace's 2016 salary.

    That works for me.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Re: potential destination for GW & humph

    In response to Fierce34's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

     

    Hoopshype says the Cs would trade Wallace and Humphries for Andre Stoudemire to get rid of Wallace's 2016 salary.

    That works for me.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    That would be the ideal scenario, but the Knicks don't want Wallace's contract.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Then sit him at the end of the bench and play Brooks at small forward.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     

Share