Re: Rondo for George HIll is fair?
posted at 1/3/2014 2:47 AM EST
In response to rameakap's comment:
Here's the thing, rame, I'm not here because I want the people here to like me.
Good because almost everyone despises you.
I simply want to talk about the Celtics, that's why I post here.
Yay! what a great person you must be then.... oh wait... you are a terrible human being who happens to talk relentlessly and endlessly about the Celtics.
So I don't care if everybody here doesn't like me.
Yup, I get that you post obnoxiously on an internet message board that attempts to be professional and maintain rules like regular society and you break those with your childish antics and 'don't care' if you are universally disliked for that.
I pity you and the serious mental issues you obviously have. So do most of the others who 'talk about the Celtics' here. Good thing you don't care about the kind of despicable and ignorant race-baiting liar and bully you come off as.
You keep saying I'm a liar because I didn't include the draft picks and cap space?
That is correct you are a LIAR when you say that I think a Rondo for Hill swap is fair or that I support this proposed trade. I made it clear I do not.
The main pieces of the trade proposal are Rondo and George Hill.
Draft picks and cap space cannot be considered main pieces in a trade? You posted no ill will towards the Raptors/Kings trade... but in your twisted head the 'main pieces' are Rudy Gay and John Salmons. Is that fair??
Oh wait the main asset for the Raptors was CAP SPACE. Idiot.
Didn't I ask you who the free-agents are for 2015?
Didn't I tell you I don't do your homework assignments?
What will you do with cap space if you no free-agent to give it to?
I am not the GM of the Celtics. But are you telling me that you are so ignorant about the way the sport is run that you do not get the utmost importance teams place on dumping overpaid players from the roster and creating cap space??
Do you think Ainge would rather pay Wallace and Lee 17 million in 2016 or George Hill 8 million? Who will be harder to move TWO players almost NOBODY wants or one player several teams wouldn't mind?
And please, Paul George is just 23 years old, you really any of the Pacers' draft picks will be high for the next 3 years?
Do you really think we are going to get a top 7 pick for Rondo in one of the deepest drafts ever??
Didn't I say I THINK WE CAN DO BETTER THAN THIS TRADE??
Hahaha... I don't even want it to happen. I just think you can argue it is fair. Why are you so mentally ill you cannot comprehend this simple thing???
Again, you lost this argument the moment you said you also don't want to trade Rondo to Indy.
People are NEVER allowed to argue something is 'FAIR' even if they don't want it to happen??
Do you actually function and live in the real world? Do you know ANYTHING about our culture and society. You are seriously messed up.
You keep justifying a trade that you don't want to happen.
You are really a piece of work. Touched in the head as they say.
So now we know Fierce 'thinks' he 'wins' arguments based on idiocy like 'nobody can defend the fairness of a trade if they don't want to see it happen' and 'nobody can prove anything or have the superior opinions/points/facts in an argument over a trade idea until the trade does or does not actually happen'.
You clearly don't get what this board is for or how debates work. Did you even get through the 6th or 7th grade? We know you must not function in (or contribute to) society with the amount of time you spend (waste) posting here. But really... it shocks me just how clueless you are.
And that is why you lose these things to me OVER and OVER. The walls in your mind that block you from thinking like a normal intelligent person are what prevent you from winning debates. It is truly sad.
Can you tell the board again how you don't think draft picks and cap space can be the 'main pieces in a trade'??
Then tell us how 'ever since they dumped Rudy Gay the Raptors have been playing great'
What were the main pieces in that trade Fiece? Cap space or Gay and John Salmons??
What a hypocrite
Tell the board some more lies about how I think Hill for Rondo is fair.
Tell them that because in your small brain it is 'stupid' to defend the fairness of something you don't really want to see go down... that automatically loses an argument for that person.
How many lawyers win cases for clients who they don't really want to see get cut a break but can properly defend with facts why it would be 'fair' if they did.
Do you understand how a debate works AT ALL Fierce?