Re: Since this is a Celtics forum
posted at 9/28/2012 5:30 AM EDT
In response to Fiercest34's comment:
The Lakers already did that in 2005 when they missed the playoffs. Duh!
Didn't the Lakers just trade Bynum for Howard?
Andrew Bynum was a lottery pick, right?
The Lakers got Bynum because they missed the playoffs.
And I never said anything about losing early in the playoffs is good.[/QUOTE]
Your own words, the Lakers will be a crappy team in the forseeable future, so BY YOUR LOGIC, what's the use of getting Howard? So Bynum is used to get a player that will make the Lakers crappy, what's the use of Bynum?
In other words, the Lakers missing the playoffs (to get Bynum) is a futile exercise, BY YOUR LOGIC!!!!
[QUOTE]All I said was the Lakers only won 1 game the last 2 seasons in the 2nd round of the playoffs. That's why the Lakers talk about D Fish. Not Derek Fisher, but the fishes Laker players and Laker fans get when they go fishing in the summer.
Using your logic (not that I agree), but "losing is losing". Lakers won 1 game in the 2nd round is no worse than the Celtics winning 5 in the second round. Your own logic already confirmed the Lakers AS SUCCESSFUL AS the Celtics in the past 2 seasons, because "losing is losing", "They don't give out silver medals for winning 1 game in the 2nd round or winning 3 games in the conference finals".
I don't agree with that but I am using your own logic to roast you...
See, arguing with you is really fun. I really don't need any argument. Just let you spout some "truth", you'll take care of yourself with your own arsenal...