Re: Wallace not considering a buyout
posted at 2/24/2014 10:17 PM EST
In response to Fiercy's comment:
In response to rameakap's comment:
What is completely clueless is posting a quote regarding the state of Wallace's contract situation NOW.
Saturday is the waiver deadline for players to be eligible for their new teams playoff roster. Obviously that writer was simply saying he doesn't expect Wallace to be bought out by then and/or Wallace hasn't asked to be.
I posted some quotes by an ESPN writer about the stretch provision that were ONE YEAR from being in the realm of discussion.
My God you are clueless.
In your petty and small attempt to wipe the egg off your face did you fail to notice that everyone is saying Ainge will again attempt to trade Wallace this summer, and if he can't again up to the deadline next season and ONLY after next year's deadline IF he needs an extra 7 million in cap space summer of 2015, will Wallace be waived/stretched.
Please follow along... your ignorace is astounding.
I never said Wallace can't be traded.
What I'm saying is Wallace won't be stretched.
For the record, rame, are telling us that Wallace will be stretched in 2015?
You're saying if Ainge needs 7m in cap space, Ainge will stretch Wallace.
That's so lame.
You're just playing it safe.
Be a man, tell us if Wallace will be stretched or not.
So you can come out and 100% say 'STOP IT... WALLACE WILL NOT BE STRETCHED'
and I have to either agree with you or 100% say he will?
Get a life, you're such a tool
Ainge will try his hardest to trade Wallace, if he can't by next years deadline and needs that cap space summer of 2015 Wallace will probably be waived and stretched. There you have it.
It's how intelligent people look at situations.