We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from ANONMD08. Show ANONMD08's posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    In response to Fierce34's comment:




    I hated to see him go adter the Celtics drafted him originally

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    way better than having jordan and bledsoe! 

    Great job Danny!
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    I would have preferred Reggie Evans, but Brooks gives us a two guard who can score.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Archer1. Show Archer1's posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans


    Rather a young player who can play than an old player who can't...

    +1 for this portion of the trade.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from fl+adam,. Show fl+adam,'s posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    Nice foil to AB. 

    Currently:

    Rondo/AB

    AB/lee/Brooks/Joseph

    Green/wallace/joseph

    Sully/hump/bass

    Hump/melo/Olynyk

     

    Be awful nice to move Wallace and Lee towards a servicable C and upgrade PF.  Would you guys move Sully as part of a Josh Smith trade? 

     

    Move Wallace to Clevand with picks for a future second.  Dump him.

    Trade Bass, Lee, Sully for S & T Josh Smith

    Pick up a MLE servicable C.

    Pick up a Vet Min BU PG.

     

    Pie in the sky

    Rondo/Vet PG

    AB/Brooks

    Green/Joseph

    Josh Smith/hump/Olynyk

    FA C/Olynyk/hump/melo

     

    Much better.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from R9R. Show R9R's posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    Dangit Fierce, you're ruining my dreams of an all PF starting line-up:

     

    Bass

    Humphries

    Evans

    Sullinger

    Olynyk

     

    Didn't somebody say rebounds win championships? We gotta be the favorite with this line-up!

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from debrit. Show debrit's posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    In response to R9R's comment:

    Dangit Fierce, you're ruining my dreams of an all PF starting line-up:

     

    Bass

    Humphries

    Evans

    Sullinger

    Olynyk

     

    Didn't somebody say rebounds win championships? We gotta be the favorite with this line-up!

    We are supposed to get worse so we can be in the lottery next year.I hate if  we became a middle of the pack team.Better for our rebuilding if we hit the botton.


     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from kdp59. Show kdp59's posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans


    well now we have an even bigger glut of players at SG

     

    C- Olynyk

    C- Melo

    C- Iverson

    PF- Bass

    PF- Sullinger

    PF- Humphries

    SF- Green

    SF- Wallace

    SF- Joseph

    SG- Bradley

    SG- Lee

    SG- Brooks

    SG- Crawford

    PG- Rondo

    I guess we need to move a SG for a PG

    Center is awful week right now too.

     

    My projected starters as we sit now wouild be

    C- Sullinger

    PF- Bass

    SF- Green

    SG- Bradley

    PG- Rondo (whenever healthy and ready to play).

    off the bench in order or playing time

    Wallace

    Lee

    Humphries

    Brooks

    Olynyk

     

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from kaktug. Show kaktug's posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    i don't think we're done making moves.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from VeniceSox. Show VeniceSox's posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    I would rather have had Evans in the deal as he is an enforcer... this team will be incredibly soft... overall Ainge did what he had to do but taking Reggie out bothers me.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from Gasthoerer. Show Gasthoerer's posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    In response to darrylfries' comment:

    Yes a big plus good defender and rebounder only shortcoming seems to be 3 point shooting.

    Signed for next two years cheap.

     




    Who are you talking about? Marshon Brooks is the opposite of a good defender.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mployee8. Show Mployee8's posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    Sweet ... Who needs Evans with Olnynk, Sully & Humphries @ PF?

    Bass could be moved along with Melo ....

     

    Center = Humphries - Randolph - Iverson

    PF = Sully - Olnynk - Humphries

    SF = Green - Wallace - Joseph

    SG = Lee - Brooks - Crawford/Bogans

    PG = Rondo - Bradley - T Williams

     

    I like it more now that Marshon is included!!!

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from fl+adam,. Show fl+adam,'s posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    Bass, Lee, Wallace, Melo, Crawford...they all need to go.  Trade them for as little as you have to take back for as few picks as you need to spend.  Especially wallace.  A Sign and trade for Josh Smith would be ideal.  If that were to happen I start adding the sullies to the mix.

     

    Rondo is a no trade for me unless I get overwhelmed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from concord27. Show concord27's posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    In response to kaktug's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    i don't think we're done making moves.

     



    True!

     

    [/QUOTE]

    It has just started.  Danny got the assets to move and now he can change this team beyond all recognition.  

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from fl+adam,. Show fl+adam,'s posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    The point isn't to lose.  The point is to reload as fast as possible, but also to a very high level.  Why tank it if we could have this:

     

    Rondo

    AB/Marshon brooks

    Green

    Josh Smith

    Olynyk

     

    and 6 1st round picks in 3 years.  Is this team not young, explosive, balanced on both D and O, and flexible enough to add a C and SG/SF over the next 3 drafts to improve those positions.  Dump the dead weight contracts, get younger and more talented, and reload.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from cole-ely. Show cole-ely's posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    Brooks and Crawford are redundant. Look for one to go.  Probably whichever the trading partner prefers. Personally i like crawford's range.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from KillaCam2010. Show KillaCam2010's posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    In response to cole-ely's comment:

    Brooks and Crawford are redundant. Look for one to go.  Probably whichever the trading partner prefers. Personally i like crawford's range.



    I agree, havent seen much of Brooks but I think I prefer Crawford too.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from KennCelt53. Show KennCelt53's posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    In response to cole-ely's comment:

    Brooks and Crawford are redundant. Look for one to go.  Probably whichever the trading partner prefers. Personally i like crawford's range.



    Let it be Crawford. He is out of control too often. He doesn't play Celtic basketball.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from Patsdateam. Show Patsdateam's posts

    Re: We Got Marshon Brooks, Not Reggie Evans

    In response to KennCelt53's comment:

    In response to cole-ely's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    Brooks and Crawford are redundant. Look for one to go.  Probably whichever the trading partner prefers. Personally i like crawford's range.

     



    Let it be Crawford. He is out of control too often. He doesn't play Celtic basketball.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Not to mention Brooks can score more often and can dish out assists from time to time

     
  25. This post has been removed.

     

Share