2 for 1

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mooney12. Show Mooney12's posts

    2 for 1

    how about the CARDINALS first pick for ryan mallet and logan mankins. They obviously need a QB and o-line help.

     

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Muzwell. Show Muzwell's posts

    Re: 2 for 1

    No harm in dreaming I guess. Mallett won't fetch a 1, let alone the first overall. Mankins is on the downside, two or three years left, maybe, and with a massive contract.  He's untradeable and not very desirable.  

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from LazarusintheSanatorium. Show LazarusintheSanatorium's posts

    Re: 2 for 1

    "He's untradeable and not very desirable."

    I have 2 letters of recomendation..and oddly enough, nearly this exact phrase appears on both of them.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from Quagmire3. Show Quagmire3's posts

    Re: 2 for 1

    Laz! Welcome back where have you been?!

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from looneyman. Show looneyman's posts

    Re: 2 for 1

    A while back I thought Mallet and

    Mankins and our 2nd for Clevlands

    First and third. I was also dreaming.

    It does seem to be a trade that would

    benifit both teams.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: 2 for 1

    welcome back Laz

    I don't see it because they don't have a 2nd this year and either their 3rd or 2nd next year. Mankins and Mallett aren't worth the #1 pick and considering the Pats want a 2nd for Malllett I don't think they'd take a 3rd for Malllett and Mankins

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: 2 for 1

    In response to looneyman's comment:

    A while back I thought Mallet and

    Mankins and our 2nd for Clevlands

    First and third. I was also dreaming.

    It does seem to be a trade that would

    benifit both teams.



    that seems about the right value. I'd do that trade

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from CaptainZdeno33. Show CaptainZdeno33's posts

    Re: 2 for 1

    And pass on a chance at the next Matt Kalil/Jake Long/Joe Thomas/insert beastly LT here that could anchor your line for the next decade? I might fire Reid before the season even started if he made that trade!

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mooney12. Show Mooney12's posts

    Re: 2 for 1

    I meant the cardinals first pick.



     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mooney12. Show Mooney12's posts

    Re: 2 for 1

    Add our second round pick.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: 2 for 1

    In response to Mooney12's comment:

    I meant the cardinals first pick.





    That one with our 1st, not our 2nd, seems reasonable but who would you take at #7? Then you have to replace Mankins. I'd have to see the total package, including what you do with the extra cap space and who you replace Mankins and Mallett with before doing it. If it's to draft a G at #7 and the difference between paying #7 and Mankins is use t replace Mallett then you didn't really gain anything but essentially gave a pick away for free. That becomes a  for 1 deal and those rarely work out for the 1 team unless they get a superstar back in return

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     

Share