Re: according to Armando Salguero of the Miami Herald Gaffney is still hopeful that the Patriots will bring him back,
posted at 9/4/2012 9:25 PM EDT
In response to TrueChamp's comment:
In response to PatsEng comment:
In response to TrueChamp comment:
In response to prolate0spheroid comment:
This is the beauty of what BB is doing. In a way, if they don't sign elsewhere we do still have them on the team. BB, the genius he is has extended the roster. He knows it will be difficult for both of those guys to find other teams. At least with a guaranteed contract. So he can keep them on speed dial when/if needed. Same thing with Warren G, and possibly Brian Waters.
It's a gamble either way. They could sign with another team (ie Gaffney visiting Dolphins) or if no team wants to sign them than what does that say about them? Essentially they could provide something but is it really anything more then what the 53rd man can provide? It's true they have more value to the Pats then any other team (mainly because of the QB) but again if they were anything more then a couple of plays a game type of players wouldn't they'd already be on the team or another team?
It's always nice to have the option but lets not pretend BB is brilliant for these types of moves. Simply put there's a reason these guys don't find other teams after being cut, what BB should get credit for is finding players that fit his system more then anyone elses, who can provide something more then JAGs, and are willing to wait by the phone for him to call. But, in reality any team can and does do this with players who fit their system when available. Of course it doesn't hurt that players like being here and they get a chance to join a contending team halfway through the season. It's just viewed as such low impact moves it's never really reported outside of the teams respective locations. I mean honestly do you think people from SD are scared about G Warren being that one piece waiting for the phone call? or that they even noticed he was cut in the first place?
Disagree. I think BB brought in 7 wr's for a reason. He never wants to see 2009 happen again, and by keeping Gaff,Branch and even STalworth to the end of camp and preseason, he made it very difficult for them to sign a guaranteed 1 year deal with another team. Without seeing any of these guys in camp or games coaches and GM's will not want to make that kind of commitment. Also I do agree a guy like Branch would have more value to us then another team, as he has the all important "chemistry" with Tommy. Gaff is the same deal due to his injury.
Plus, this isn't really as much of a risk. These guys barring injury to WW or Lloyd were not going to see a ton of snaps. I think it is clear that when we take a WW/Lloyd or Hern off the field, we will be replacing them with Shank,Fells,A FB or 2 RBs quite often. Depth is important but if other teams do sign Branch and Gaff. It wouldn't be much of a blow to our team. And honestly by trading for Salas, we might not even have a need for these guys at all.
True, you started off saying you disagree but by the end basically said what I was saying. That they have more value to this team then others, but would still only play minor roles hence why they aren't on the team right now. This happens with every team we just don't hear about it because they are minor moves unless you follow the team. All I'm saying is that this happens all the time to every team so as much as I love BB this isn't a brilliant move that BB thought up. This happens everywhere and any coach/GM worth his paycheck should do this.