Re: Anatomy of a Choke.
posted at 1/20/2011 5:15 PM EST
In Response to Re: Anatomy of a Choke.
[QUOTE]In Response to Anatomy of a Choke. : Were you a writer for Seinfeld? Friends? Sesame Street? LMFAO! I guess you knew all along that BB was going to, AND suppoosed to take a team that didn't make any splashy offseason moves like, say, those JESTS!, and should have been THE sexy pick to win it all, right? Why I seem to recall all those experts taking the JESTS! to win the division. How'd that work out for them? But, I digress a little. Let's look at their last game. I guess it was BB's "fault" that Brady threw the INT on the first drive (which, need I remind you, didn't put points on the JESTS! side of the scoreboard). Or that it was MORE his fault when Crumpler dropped the TD on their 2nd drive. What was going through BB's head when he called that play? IDIOT! Or that Chung botched the fake punt when, if he properly executes the play, he's still running. Right? How dare BB call a play that was going to work (the JESTS! played the punt, NOT the fake). What a freakin' moron! Then there's Branch's drop on the 4th down/13 that would have gotten a 1st down inside the JESTS! 20. You know the play... the 14th on a long drive that started on their own 18? BB should have called on another WR for that play, even though Branch WAS open and could have stepped out right after the catch. Why, BB needs to turn in his whistle, piece of chalk, and key to the exec washroom! How does a guy like that ever get a chance to coach in the NFL in the first place????? Now, let's look at the JESTS!. Seems to me that they were billed as having a good defense, and they sure as hell played like they had one. Desp[ite that, the Pats still had opportunties to put that game early, IF players executed plays. But, adding 2 TD's to the Pats score would have made the difference (1st and 2nd drives, or 2nd and 10 possession, when Branch played T Rex). And who know what was going to results if Chung doesn't gak the play. Hold that thought. I'm sure that BB would have called a fumble play, right? I'm sure that you'd agree that BB's erroneously called for teh onside kick with @2 minutes left, scheming it for a 23 yd return AND an additional 5 yard penalty tacked on "just because"? Now, let's look at the Patriots pass defense. Ranked 35th out of 32 teams, right? So, it's BB's fault when that same defense gives up 2 long pass plays that results in TD's (37 to Edwards and 58 to Cotchery).Hell, Cotchery's catch came on their longerst "drive", starting on their own 25 yard line! 5 plays and a TD. Then, you can always look at the game stats. The Pats had the egde in: time of possession, total yards, passing yards, and were 7 short of the JESTS! in rushing. All are things that usually indicate a team wins. But, they were out-executed on several plays, which directly related to the final results. Brady raised his right hand and took responsibility for the INT on the screen pass, of all things, on the first drive. Perhaps you weren't paying attention? Crumpler did the same for his huge TD drop, Chung fessed up on his gak, and Branch did likewise on his late game drop. All were plays BB called to put the Pats into position to score, and all were not executed on by the players mentioned. But you blame BB. May I suggest you stick with your box of Play-dough? It's pretty, comes in all colors, and you can make it to be whatever you want it to be, unlike your brilliant "analysis" of a football game. How special is that?
Posted by AZPAT[/QUOTE]
Yikes! AZPAT is angry.
What's za matta? Don't they have a football team out there in Arizona for you to root for? Oh, yeah, they do, they're called the Cardinals.
I'm asking because I live in Boston, and I wonder why all you out of state, so-called fans come on here telling people how to think and behave on this board, a board located in Boston, Ma, in Dorchester. Know where that is?
Do you really have a problem blaming BB and TB for the loss on Sunday? Who would you blame for the clock killing 8 minute drive ending on a 4 & 13 in-completion or the fake punt which should have never been on the table as an option in even the remotest sense? Or Tom getting gun-shy and seeing ghosts out of the corner of his eyes and mis-firing?
I said all along that it was a team loss but that the leaders bear the brunt of the blame. Do you disagree with that statement?AZPAT
. . . IDIOT! . . .
May I suggest you stick with your box of Play-dough? It's pretty, comes in all colors, and you can make it to be whatever you want it to be, unlike your brilliant "analysis" of a football game. How special is that?
This is typical of these out-of-state trogs, name-calling, insults, and personal attacks.
I hardly have to make the point anymore, they make it so well for me.
I'm laughing at you, not with you, AZ.
How bout them Cardinals?