BARSTOOL SHOULD HAVE BEEN PUNISHED ALONG WITH MRS. BRADY, MORE DISTRACTIONS TO COME FOR #12?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN. Show COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN's posts

    BARSTOOL SHOULD HAVE BEEN PUNISHED ALONG WITH MRS. BRADY, MORE DISTRACTIONS TO COME FOR #12?

    cant believe what i just heard, saw and read. listened to the archive from the big show on eei this morning from their show from yesterday. there's a very intimate spread of gissy on display on the beach with another hot girl with tom and gissy's 2yo son in his birthday suit with his LITTLE TOMMY on open exploitive display with the most lewd and inappropriate commentary below it. barstool is supposedly a mainstream online gossip site that has clearly now hit the lowest of lows. how is this not against the law and norms? Was going to provide the usual link but think its best for those of you who may be interested to make the effort on your own.

    i hope tom gets his legal team to go as far as possible in persecuting these guys. however, my biggest rage is towards gisele. how could she possibly think its appropriate for her to walk her around fully clothed albeit in a tiny bikini while her innocent child walks around in his birthday suit? there is no privacy anymore esp for them. she should know better! what was she thinking? perhaps mrs. brady is i need of some parenting refresher courses. 

    now i have to wonder what level of distraction this perpetual trojan horsed delilah has now brought forth to our superstar qb? the only thing that can stop tom and my pats this season seems to be gissy! 
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from timesedge. Show timesedge's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    Tom doesn't give a shyte. It's a little kid - kids run around naked sometimes. Big deal...

    Also, Gisele is brazilian. They don't have the same prudish reaction to nudity that our victorian era forefathers managed to bestow onto us.

    And if he did sue the tabloid he'd be doing them a favor by getting them free press anyway so that's probably not going to happen either.
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from agcsbill. Show agcsbill's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    Still stirring the pot, CC..  you surely get your panties up in a bunch over the silliest things!
     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN. Show COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    In Response to Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?:
    [QUOTE]Tom doesn't give a shyte. It's a little kid - kids run around naked sometimes. Big deal... Also, Gisele is brazilian. They don't have the same prudish reaction to nudity that our victorian era forefathers managed to bestow onto us. And if he did sue the tabloid he'd be doing them a favor by getting them free press anyway so that's probably not going to happen either.
    Posted by timesedge[/QUOTE]yep kids run ard like that all the time. i was raised in that type of environment... but are pervs taking pics of them and openly posting them all over the internet for posterity and making lewd remarks about the size of his babymaker? answer is NO NO! YOUR FIRST JOB IS TO PROTECT YOUR KID. we make fun of peyton all the time. can u imagine if there were naked child pics of him out there in the public domain? of course it would be fair game for some on this board. if it were the other way, of course UD6 would be all over that. there's no upside to it, can only come back to bite him in the a--.
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN. Show COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    In Response to Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?:
    [QUOTE]Still stirring the pot, CC..  you surely get your panties up in a bunch over the silliest things!
    Posted by agcsbill[/QUOTE]you  like some others are always behind the proverbial 8 ball. what happened after last season when i kept harping in the fact that bill had to spice things up to win in the playoffs, the boring vanilla players with the boring vanilla coach had passed its expiration date. now voila, we have some flava every where and even boll's cracking jokes after a pre-season win and almost jumping all over farnham in girly joy after his interception. you need passion not just logic. likewise, this "little" issue is going to blow up and have repercussions well beyond the obvious of today. this is NOT good!
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from niz-58. Show niz-58's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    In Response to Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12? : you  like some others are always behind the proverbial 8 ball. what happened after last season when i kept harping in the fact that bill had to spice things up to win in the playoffs, the boring vanilla players with the boring vanilla coach had passed its expiration date. now voila, we have some flava every where and even boll's cracking jokes after a pre-season win and almost jumping all over farnham in girly joy after his interception. you need passion not just logic. likewise, this "little" issue is going to blow up and have repercussions well beyond the obvious of today. this is NOT good!
    Posted by COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN[/QUOTE]

    Oh, good God, shut up!!
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Rocky. Show Rocky's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    Enough said...

    COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN is a person with a preference for taking a position opposed to that of the majority. CC has styles of argument and disagreement that are associated with radicalism and dissent.
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN. Show COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    so glad the case has been resolved. for all of u saying it was no distraction, according to the barstool guy not only did state troopers show up to his house on behalf of tommmy but according to even the attorney general, numerous pats sources and those acting on behalf of the krafts and i'm sure belichick had touched base with her to resolve the case as quickly as possible. no way belichick and others were just coy about it all. any man who has no beef with his little boy's beef being out there in a prurient way is not a man!some women like gissy tend to be clueless about the real evils about this world in thinking everyone else shares their kumbaya views esp about sxuality. they think all men are just potential llittle gals with pe-nises. 

    GLAD THE ISSUE IS RESOLVED BUT VERY SCARY THAT THE STATE CAN USE ITS POLICE POWER TO INTIMIDATE a journalist in that way. oh i forgot, this really wasnt a big deal right?
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from anonymis. Show anonymis's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    fist of all, giselle is Brazilian.  In Brasil (and MANY other countries), it's acceptable for adults and children to run around nekkid on the beach. The picture was taken in Costa Rica - not here in the "conservative" U S of A.

    Breast feeding in public is also acceptable in OTHER countries; some breast feed until the children are 3-4 years old - something that is rarely done in the U.S. of A.

    Tom was obviously okay with it...so, if it's okay with them - who cares what the american media or you think about it?

    Mebbe it's you who have a low tolerance for differences regarding for what is "right or wrong"?


     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from jalvis. Show jalvis's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    In Response to Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?:
    [QUOTE]so glad the case has been resolved. for all of u saying it was no distraction, according to the barstool guy not only did state troopers show up to his house on behalf of tommmy but according to even the attorney general, numerous pats sources and those acting on behalf of the krafts and i'm sure belichick had touched base with her to resolve the case as quickly as possible. no way belichick and others were just coy about it all. any man who has no beef with his little boy's beef being out there in a prurient way is not a man!some women like gissy tend to be clueless about the real evils about this world in thinking everyone else shares their kumbaya views esp about sxuality. they think all men are just potential llittle gals with pe-nises. 
    Posted by COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN[/QUOTE]

    Honestly....I was kind of surprised there weren't charges brought up on this.  And it has nothing to do with the Krafts OR "Tommy".  I was just under the impression that displaying photos of nude children on the internet was a felony.  Period.  I didn't think that the intent of it being porn or not was important.  I believe that's what the DA and state police were investigating.  But I certainly could be wrong about that.

    As for this being a distraction to Brady on the field?  Ummm......no.
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from lippa. Show lippa's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    When I saw this on the news the guy told police or whoever he would take the pic down if brady called him.So I dont know if this was some crazed fan tring to met and talk too brady or what.
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from LazarusintheSanatorium. Show LazarusintheSanatorium's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    In Response to Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12? : Honestly....I was kind of surprised there weren't charges brought up on this.  And it has nothing to do with the Krafts OR "Tommy".  I was just under the impression that displaying photos of nude children on the internet was a felony.  Period.  I didn't think that the intent of it being porn or not was important.  I believe that's what the DA and state police were investigating.  But I certainly could be wrong about that. As for this being a distraction to Brady on the field?  Ummm......no.
    Posted by jalvis[/QUOTE]

    Yea, America is pretty f'ckd up.   Honestly, when it comes to kids, I don't even know the rules now- Is like saying, "Cool bike there lil' fella," to a kid ridin' his scooter out in the parkin' lot of your condo complex when you're walking out to your car...Is ah-is this a crime now, I don't really know anymore. 

    When I was living with a longtime girlfriend in some makeshift converted seperate apartment up in her parent's top garage, I remember some random conversation that I had with her mom downstairs 1 time, maybe it was something about a family mural in the hallway or something- I'm thinkin' now thats musta been what it was, Pictures of her and her brother as kids... The mom said something to me about, how they once had a random pic of my girlfriend & her brother at like 1 and a half and 2 years old just splashing around in a bubblebath, or something the vast majority of the universe outside the US borders, would consider benign or cute, or just "Oh=Kids." But at some family party or I forget, some person made this pic to be obscene & god only knows what else, And I believe she told me that this person threatened to call the authorities on her, for child <fill in some multiple last 20 years law, number of blanks />.

    Kr!st when I turn on and flip through MSNBC, I feel like there are child predators everywhere...I'm like, "Yikes, is 1 BEHIND me! There must be trillions of them, feasting on little kids during the sabbath moon..."  Idk- next time some kid just goes, "Hey bub, check out my awesome dirt bicycle, No training wheels, yippee!," I'm just gonna take the safe road from now on, and say, "Don't TALK to me! I don't want NOTHIN' ta do with you! Just leave me alone, Arrrgh!" <while I go running the other way />  This seems to be the best course of action available to any & all adults right now...gotta be tough if you have kids, but I'd still go screamin' the other way...why take chances, ya know?  
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from TFB12. Show TFB12's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    This is another non issue, 2yr olds running around nude...It kind of common to see on a beach.

    anyways... just to add to this worthless thread...

    www.tenthdimension.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?p=9705&sid=49f343a4698e340d0ffda4a77f4e802c#p9705">Postby Xyem » Fri May 21, 2010 5:39 am

    I stumbled across the animation of this and found it was explained extremely well, though it did take me a while to "wrap my head" around what I was being told! www.tenthdimension.com/phpbb/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" />

    After I showed it to a friend, we started talking about it and the implications and between us we used to it explain a few things and discuss what is probably quite a common question. Does it mean we have no free will?

    For some reason, we want it to be true that we do have free will but once you get to a certain dimension, it stops being possible. However, a "solution" to this "problem" was found during our discussion. Essentially, our "concious" or "soul" exists in the tenth dimension and that is where we exercise our freewill, by choosing our "path" through the lower dimensions. Perhaps we were bored with knowing and observing everything and chose to limit our perception to one "strand" though the 3rd dimension.

    A little bit crazy, perhaps, but it also leads to some (hopefully interesting) explanations.

    The first of which is that we are all in our own manner, God. Praying being a simple attempt to communicate with our "higher concious" which has the power to change the course of the "path" by continuing the experience from another point within the system.

    If this is the case, several phenomena become explained.
    Déjà vu is a result of when the path is changed, eg. due to a situation being a fraction of a second later in the point that your higher concious "jumped" to. (very Matrix-y, I know)
    Being able to tell the future is a "leak" of information from the higher concious. As is being able to communicate with the "dead".
    Memories from past lives if the higher concious can start a new path when the previous one ends. Also explaining how you feel like you know someone you have just met/barely know (met them in a previous "incarnation")

    She also proposed that soul mates can be explained by this, where the 10th dimension concious' will chose a path where they get to meet their mate, perhaps even across multiple paths.

    Furthermore, if the higher concious is impaired in some way while following a path, if they feel the same morals as we do, it is possible that on awakening at the end of a path and reflecting on it, they may punish or reward themselves for their "behaviour" by picking a worse/better path next time (heaven and hell)

    Pretty random but hopefully at least some food for thought. Pretty unscientific considering the couple of "leaps" before getting to the explanations for those phenomenons and the boatload of "ifs" but I found the discussion interesting nonetheless. Who knows, we could even be right! www.tenthdimension.com/phpbb/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" />
     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from teamspike. Show teamspike's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    Not a felony or a crime period when there's no sexuality involved. The site in question is a big patriots supporting site, and I think the general idea behind what the blogger was saying had to do with "Brady is awesome and churns out kids like this, while Peyton sucks." Barstool posts outrageous crap all the time. He made some poor decisions but I don't think they were made with any intent to stir up publicity or attention. The pictures were already all over the internet already.

    Clearly Brady won't let this bother him at all and IMO I think it was only blown out of proportion by the radio shows and media that decided to take up arms about it. 

    This country baffles me sometimes. Who cares if some nobody decides to mention that Brady's son has a big dingaling. We obviously have bigger issues that we should be getting up in arms about...

    Such as Ochocinco not being allowed to pay Foster's fine WTH IS THAT??
     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from jalvis. Show jalvis's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    In Response to Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?:
    [QUOTE]Not a felony or a crime period when there's no sexuality involved.
    Posted by teamspike[/QUOTE]

    But what is considered "sexuality"?  If some crazy pervert downloaded the pic for his own "personal use" then it would be sexual.  It happens all the time:  guy gets busted for kiddie porn.  Police confiscate the man's computer and find pics.  If he's been pleasuring himself to the sight of nude children then it IS porn reguardless of what the children are doing in the photo. 

    I'm done talking about this.  I feel gross even thinking about it in this forum.  I need to take a shower now!
     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from teamspike. Show teamspike's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    In Response to Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?:
    [QUOTE]I feel gross even thinking about it in this forum.  I need to take a shower now!
    Posted by jalvis[/QUOTE]

    Maybe this is the problem? Why are you feeling grossed out by this discussion? Nobody is willing to have an open conversation about this stuff. Just freak out and post things online in all caps. I don't think it was a sexual picture or caption. Maybe it was in bad taste considering which country he was posting in...

    The state troopers that showed up at Barstool's door said something along the lines of, "you aren't doing anything illegal, we would like to ask you to take this down."
     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from Davedsone. Show Davedsone's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    In Response to BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?:
    [QUOTE]cant believe what i just heard, saw and read. listened to the archive from the big show on eei this morning from their show from yesterday. there's a very intimate spread of gissy on display on the beach with another hot girl with tom and gissy's 2yo son in his birthday suit with his LITTLE TOMMY on open exploitive display with the most lewd and inappropriate commentary below it. barstool is supposedly a mainstream online gossip site that has clearly now hit the lowest of lows. how is this not against the law and norms? Was going to provide the usual link but think its best for those of you who may be interested to make the effort on your own. i hope tom gets his legal team to go as far as possible in persecuting these guys. however, my biggest rage is towards gisele. how could she possibly think its appropriate for her to walk her around fully clothed albeit in a tiny bikini while her innocent child walks around in his birthday suit? there is no privacy anymore esp for them. she should know better! what was she thinking? perhaps mrs. brady is i need of some parenting refresher courses.  now i have to wonder what level of distraction this perpetual trojan horsed delilah has now brought forth to our superstar qb? the only thing that can stop tom and my pats this season seems to be gissy! 
    Posted by COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN[/QUOTE]

    Hes a toddler.  People used to do this all the time.  And don't give me that there weren't pervs then, there were.  Its not a big deal unless some uppity freak says it is.  So stop saying it is.  

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from jalvis. Show jalvis's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    In Response to Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12? : Maybe this is the problem? Why are you feeling grossed out by this discussion? Nobody is willing to have an open conversation about this stuff. Just freak out and post things online in all caps. I don't think it was a sexual picture or caption. Maybe it was in bad taste considering which country he was posting in... The state troopers that showed up at Barstool's door said something along the lines of, "you aren't doing anything illegal, we would like to ask you to take this down."
    Posted by teamspike[/QUOTE]

    Look....I know I said that I wasn't going to talk about it any further on this forum.  But you telling me that I shouldn't be grossed out on this topic was out of line.  Fact is....you have no idea what experiences I or anyone else on this forum has had in relation to sexual predators or anything relating to child pornography.  And therefore have no place telling myself or anyone else how we should feel about it.  I'm not going to disclose my past experiences....but believe me...I have had many discussions on this matter with many professionals.  Not some troll with 5 posts.

    Let me ask you this:  When did I "freak out and post in all caps"?
     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from Gulo. Show Gulo's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    no, hes clearly seen her naked.... this is no biggie.

    regardless
    SUPERBOWL OR BUST
     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from Paul_K. Show Paul_K's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    I have changed my grandchildren's diapers without getting all hung up about seeing their bare bottoms.  It was stinky tho.

    A stretch way overboard for CC.
     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN. Show COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE PUNISHED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    In Response to Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12? : Maybe this is the problem? Why are you feeling grossed out by this discussion? Nobody is willing to have an open conversation about this stuff. Just freak out and post things online in all caps. I don't think it was a sexual picture or caption. Maybe it was in bad taste considering which country he was posting in... The state troopers that showed up at Barstool's door said something along the lines of, "you aren't doing anything illegal, we would like to ask you to take this down."
    Posted by teamspike[/QUOTE]i think you get my intent. my main purpose was to stir up honest debate on a subject most in the US just bury in their consciousness. kind of funny how the us is the most sexually teasing country in the world and gives all the signs of being a very promiscous nation always in the pursuit of liberty and loose women, yet when it comes to admitting it openly it so full of hangups and weirdness. the virgin mary meets the wild child. the puritans and conservative right versus the wild stance guys in bathroom stalls and so forth. 

    when i lived in europe, i could watch tv with nude women on daytime mainstream network tv when i came home from school. sometimes the kids would walk in and it was no big deal. us just has hangups with all its erotic liberties yet its the one given the most freedom to express oneself than any other nation on earth. bottom line my beef with the barstool article was the sophomoricman-meat comment directed to a 2 yo. i also assumed it was a crime to have a nude 2 yo in open display like that. 

    i'm not a prude but i have qualms with it being legal. no beef with it happening per se but a stranger should not be able to take a pic and post it. what hw does with it in private is ultimately his issue. 

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN. Show COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    In Response to Re: BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to BARSTOOL SPORTS SHOULD BE SUED BUT SO SHOULD MRS. BRADY.. WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12? : Hes a toddler.  People used to do this all the time.  And don't give me that there weren't pervs then, there were.  Its not a big deal unless some uppity freak says it is.  So stop saying it is.  
    Posted by Davedsone[/QUOTE]
    would this be your attitude if it were a 2 yo gal? b honest!
     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from lippa. Show lippa's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SHOULD HAVE BEEN PUNISHED ALONG WITH MRS. BRADY, WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

          Whats wrong is the world people overreact to stuff like this,yes the caption is wrong  IMO but doesnt make it illegal ethier.I think parents try to protect there kids to much from stuff ,like when the school is 2 blocks away from thier home and mommy drives and picks them up thats pretty said.Parents cant discipline thier kids anymore cause the kids will call the cops and the parent gets thrown in jail or get charges agianst them.
     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from isurfvb35. Show isurfvb35's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SHOULD HAVE BEEN PUNISHED ALONG WITH MRS. BRADY, WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    another example of the media outlets trying to make something out of nothing.
     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonTrollSpanker. Show BostonTrollSpanker's posts

    Re: BARSTOOL SHOULD HAVE BEEN PUNISHED ALONG WITH MRS. BRADY, WHAT KIND OF DISTRACTION WILL THIS BE FOR #12?

    This story and thread has no relevance to the 2011 Patriots whatsoever. It brings up interesting and important questions about media and privacy and parenting etc but that has nothing to do with the 2011 Patriots. So, two answer the CC original question, this amounts to no distraction at all for the team.
     

Share