BB should sign............

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mooney12. Show Mooney12's posts

    Re: BB should sign............

    We now have Lloyd, Gonzalez, and Trevor scott. Who else do we need or want.
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: BB should sign............

    Marcus McNeill would be nice if Light retires or restructures for only a couple million. Make Vollmer a backup to both McNeil and Solder as he can't stay healthy enough to be counted on.
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from LazarusintheSanatorium. Show LazarusintheSanatorium's posts

    Re: BB should sign............

    In Response to Re: BB should sign............:
    [QUOTE]Andre carter is overated and he aint better than anderson or wimbley
    Posted by Mooney12[/QUOTE]

    No.  Not...even...close.  Andre Carter is, And WAS, More consistant than Mark Anderson, More Productive than Mark Anderson, and good grief-Above EVERY-thing: Andre Carter was WAY more complete than Mark Anderson.  Anderson, until Into the playoffs, WAS an absolute detriment to every other Patriot Defender in terms of Anderson's willingness, skills and accountability to play The Freak!ng RUNNING GAME (as well as pass-rush).  Anderson's utterly sporadic Sack Production does NOTHINg to account for just how poorly he defended the run on his side.

    Here's the place where Mark Anderson beats Andre Carter:
    Anderson's 28 and not coming off season ending multiple ACL tears...
    Carter's 32 and he IS coming off season ending multiple ACL tears...

     
     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: BB should sign............

    In Response to Re: BB should sign............:
    [QUOTE]Marcus McNeill would be nice if Light retires or restructures for only a couple million. Make Vollmer a backup to both McNeil and Solder as he can't stay healthy enough to be counted on.
    Posted by rameakap[/QUOTE]


    nice thinking re volmer.
    hard to be counted on as a starter. hope he is done with his injuries.
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from LazarusintheSanatorium. Show LazarusintheSanatorium's posts

    Re: BB should sign............

    This must be one of those instances where people can only recall the 1st game of the 2011 Season, The last 2 games of the playoffs...and subsequently everything else in between being just a grey hazy non-descript total blur, their take on reality becomes entirely set in place by what occured at the very first onset of the 1st half in Week 1 and the final 1 and 1/2 games of the postseason...

    Here ya go in terms of snap count, courtesy of ESPN Boston:


    DE Andre Carter -- 55.8%
    DL Kyle Love -- 50.5%
    DE Mark Anderson -- 47.6%
    <including the guy right in between, percentage-wise />

    Not sure if this includes playoffs...IF the answer's NO- then the Mark Anderson argument's even that much worse (b/c his snap count percentage will be evn greater).

    Andre Carter- 52 TTs 10 Sacks 2 FFs and 1 PD...and he got injured at the very, VERY beginning of the Week 15 Game, missing that and the week 16 game.

    Mark Anderson- 29TTs 10 Sacks 2 FFs and 1 PD <small "of note" to consider: 7...yes, 7 of Anderson's 29TTs came in the final regular season gravy week, with NE blowing up Buffalo; Other than that, Anderson had 1 game with 4TTs, 2 Games with 3 TTs <mind you a "TT" is the combo of solo tackles and assists, e.g. Anderson's week 5 game vs NYJ's was 1 solo tackle, 2 Assists, for a whopping 3 TTs />; All the remaining games, Anderson had 2 Combined Tackles <3 games>, 1 Combined Tackle(s)<6 Games>, or just 0 Tackles<3 games>...And these numbers solely include the games Anderson DID, in fact, play in.

    They do NOT include the playoffs in a player's standard tally.  For Anderson it amounted to: Vs. Denver-3TTs, 0 Sacks, 1 PD, 0 FFs/ Vs. Baltimore-3TTs, 1 Sack, 0 PDs, 0 FFs/Vs. NYG-5TTs, 1.5 Sacks, 0 PDs, 0 FFs.


    Let's not get carried away with the guy who's just an absolute bona fide A#1 D-Line Weak-Link verses the run, Extremely sporadic with a feast or total famine offerings for his pass-rush (Sacks), And whom does nrxt to nothing in terms of the added extras like bat down passes at the LOS, and/or Force Fumbles.

    Just sayin'...On Mark Anderson's side above and in relation to just Andre Carter alone...Anderson has: 4 years more of youth, and the fact that he ended last season without requiring surgery.  That's it.  Oh, and guess what?  Mark my words=Anderson WILL command significantly more money than Carter (b/c other people have just as short a memory as some of you guys do).   
     

Share