Re: Butler + Colts + Indy Fans = Choke Job again
posted at 4/6/2010 1:37 PM EDT
In Response to Re: Butler + Colts + Indy Fans = Choke Job again
[QUOTE]Harley - Blissfully Ignorant reminds me of a punk who would slap his mother for not making him breakfast. Frankly, anyone who can rag on another team that has been more successful than his team isn't a fan. He's a jealous immature child. And yes, over the last half decade, the colts have had more success than the pats. You may feel my pain, but that's because you possess something called reason. A guy like Blissfully Ignorant (4g?) has different pain, like Charles Manson. 4g - Did you forget that you were supposed to be playing me? You can't attack me when you are trying to be me. LOL. If there is such thing as a schizophrenic actor, you are it. LOL. Excuses for sitting starters? The team did what they felt they had to do to make their run, and it worked. In one year with nothing on the line, the pats play their starters and you think that as their fan, you now possess some moral authority over other teams' fans whose teams operates differently. Do you suffer from amnesia? Don't you remember (during the pats superbowl era) that Belichick sat his starters when there was nothing on the line? This one instance of Belichick not sitting his starters has you acting like the born again Christian or the reformed alcoholic or smoker that completely rejects his past now that something has changed?
Here's the fact, you can't change the past, and whether or not the pats chose not to rest their starters one year does not absolve them from doing it before then. Your moral authority is more aptly wretched hypocrisy. As for debate team tactics - many here who have trashed my arguements clearly know I have never taken a debate class, let alone participated on a debate team. I am a sports guy.
Posted by underdoggg[/QUOTE]
What does Belichick have to do with our beloved Colts team??? You are really obsessed with the Patriots and should just focus on what we can do to make our team better. Once again back to the name calling because you have no true arguments.
Also I never accused you of being on a debate team although you must think quite a bit of yourself in that area. Anyone that knows debating knows that the first one to start calling names loses in any debate and that's half of your platform.
I can also see that I was right about you projecting as you keep harping on the Bradley thing so why don't you get Jules Winfield out of the closet and have him support your arguments.
Maybe you can create an Underdogg with 5 G's and argue with both of us.
Oops, I almost forgot to laugh at you...LOL, LMao, Rtflmao. Must be tough not having any friends in Indiana.