Different topic - 11/22/1963

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from pcmIV. Show pcmIV's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to ATJ's comment:

    I'm inclined to subscribe to this view.  Only thing that has ever give me pause was Jack Ruby.  Can't seem to reconcile that part of it.



    One nutjob kills another?

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to Muzwell's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    But they've never tied Oswald to anybody.

    [/QUOTE]

    Well, that's why they chose him.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from CatfishHunter. Show CatfishHunter's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Muzwell's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    But they've never tied Oswald to anybody.

    [/QUOTE]

    Well, that's why they chose him.

    [/QUOTE]


    C'mon Babe.  With that logic every person who kills another is part of an undiscovered conspiracy.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from ATJ. Show ATJ's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to pcmIV's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ATJ's comment:

    [QUOTE]

    I'm inclined to subscribe to this view.  Only thing that has ever give me pause was Jack Ruby.  Can't seem to reconcile that part of it.

    [/QUOTE]

    One nutjob kills another?

    [/QUOTE]

    No question that is what it boils down to.  Just never could make sense of it but, then again, what about any of it made sense. 

     

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to CatfishHunter's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Muzwell's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    But they've never tied Oswald to anybody.

    [/QUOTE]

    Well, that's why they chose him.

    [/QUOTE]


    C'mon Babe.  With that logic every person who kills another is part of an undiscovered conspiracy.

    [/QUOTE]


    Obviously any conspiracy is going to pick an unconnected guy to be the fall guy. Then then silence him for good measure. And just as obviously the plethora of evidence that point to more than Oswald being involved trumps the simple theory you just expressed.

    Did you hear, the US Congress investigated this and said it was a conspiracy. The acoustic evidence alone is virtually irrefutable.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from CatfishHunter. Show CatfishHunter's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Obviously any conspiracy is going to pick an unconnected guy to be the fall guy. Then then silence him for good measure. And just as obviously the plethora of evidence that point to more than Oswald being involved trumps the simple theory you just expressed.

    Did you hear, the US Congress investigated this and said it was a conspiracy. The acoustic evidence alone is virtually irrefutable.

    [/QUOTE]

    US Congress.   Got to hand it to you.  That's funny!

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from CatfishHunter. Show CatfishHunter's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    Obviously any conspiracy is going to pick an unconnected guy to be the fall guy.

    [/QUOTE]

    So, when Leon Czolgosz murdered President McKinley in front of hundreds of people that too must have been a conspiracy.    We just haven't found the co-conspirators 100+ years later.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    The

    United States House Select Committee on Assassinations

    concluded.....

    Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that at least two gunmen fired at the President.

    The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy.


    the fourth shot came from a second assassin located on the grassy knoll, but missed.

     

    Also of note.....


    The Chief Counsel of the Committee later changed his views that the CIA was being cooperative and forthcoming with the investigation when he learned that the CIA's special liaison to the Committee researchers, George Joannides, was actually involved with some of the organizations that Lee Harvey Oswald was involved with in the months leading up to the assassination, including an anti-Castro group, the DRE, which was linked to the CIA, where the liaison, Joannides, worked in 1963. Chief Counsel Blakey later stated that Joannides, instead, should have been interviewed by the Committee, rather than serving as a gatekeeper to the CIA's evidence and files regarding the assassination. He further disregarded and suspected all the CIA's statements and representations to the Committee, accusing it of obstruction of justice.

     

     

     

    C'mon you guys. Talk about buying the BS hook line and sinker. Wake up.

     

     

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to CatfishHunter's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Obviously any conspiracy is going to pick an unconnected guy to be the fall guy. Then then silence him for good measure. And just as obviously the plethora of evidence that point to more than Oswald being involved trumps the simple theory you just expressed.

    Did you hear, the US Congress investigated this and said it was a conspiracy. The acoustic evidence alone is virtually irrefutable.

    [/QUOTE]

    US Congress.   Got to hand it to you.  That's funny!

    [/QUOTE]


    The US Congress and basically everybody else except a few gullible people and the Warren Commission. LMAO

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to CatfishHunter's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    Obviously any conspiracy is going to pick an unconnected guy to be the fall guy.

    [/QUOTE]

    So, when Leon Czolgosz murdered President McKinley in front of hundreds of people that too must have been a conspiracy.    We just haven't found the co-conspirators 100+ years later.

    [/QUOTE]


    Did they have scores of books, movies and a Congressional committee look into that one because the story given was so badly contradicted by the evidence? Has ANY other assassination been so widely acclaimed as a conspiracy?

    Did Czolgosz claim he was a patsy and get silenced by a mob connected guy too? LMAO

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to Harvey-Wallbanger's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to themightypatriots' comment:
    [QUOTE]

    JFK campaigned on increasing the number of nuclear missiles capable of ending all life on Earth.  The psychopath got what he deserved.

    [/QUOTE]

    You're a psychopath.   

    [/QUOTE]


    The moon must be blue, because we agree.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from CatfishHunter. Show CatfishHunter's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to CatfishHunter's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Obviously any conspiracy is going to pick an unconnected guy to be the fall guy. Then then silence him for good measure. And just as obviously the plethora of evidence that point to more than Oswald being involved trumps the simple theory you just expressed.

    Did you hear, the US Congress investigated this and said it was a conspiracy. The acoustic evidence alone is virtually irrefutable.

    [/QUOTE]

    US Congress.   Got to hand it to you.  That's funny!

    [/QUOTE]


    The US Congress and basically everybody else except a few gullible people and the Warren Commission. LMAO

    [/QUOTE]

    The United States House Select Committee on Assassinations put too much stock in what they thought at the time the accoustical evidence showed.  It has been largely debunked.

    As for Oswald's "ties" ... my god, Leon Czolgosz was an open anarchist.   Sometimes lunatics act alone.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from ATJ. Show ATJ's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Harvey-Wallbanger's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to themightypatriots' comment:
    [QUOTE]

    JFK campaigned on increasing the number of nuclear missiles capable of ending all life on Earth.  The psychopath got what he deserved.

    [/QUOTE]

    You're a psychopath.   

    [/QUOTE]


    The moon must be blue, because we agree.

    [/QUOTE]

    I just knew you two would find common ground one day but then again I'm an eternal optimist.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from ATJ. Show ATJ's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    I've tried not to dwell on what happened 50 years ago for a number of reasons.  What I will say is this:  Although many have been critical of the Warren Commission's findings none of their conclusions require a leap of faith IMO.  On the other hand, every alternative that I've read has required some measure of such a leap at some point in the logic trail.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from CatfishHunter. Show CatfishHunter's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:
    [QUOTE]


    Did they have scores of books, movies and a Congressional committee look into that one because the story given was so badly contradicted by the evidence? Has ANY other assassination been so widely acclaimed as a conspiracy?

    Did Czolgosz claim he was a patsy and get silenced by a mob connected guy too? LMAO

    [/QUOTE]

    Why do you keep mentioning what Oswald said?  You believe him?  You believe him when he said he killed "nobody"?   There were witnesses to him being at the scene of the Tippit murder including an eyewitness to the shooting itself.

    They put Czolgosz to death.  I guess that silenced him pretty good.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to CatfishHunter's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    As for Oswald's "ties" ... my god, Leon Czolgosz was an open anarchist.   Sometimes lunatics act alone.

    [/QUOTE]

    LMAO Did Leon have connections to the CIA like Oswald?

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from ghostofjri37. Show ghostofjri37's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    If there was a conspiracy you need to follow the money. Never underestimate the greed of obscenely rich people. they will do whatever it takes to stay obscenely rich. Shlt the only reason people go to war is over ideology and money.

    The federal reserve is controlled by an elite few in the world and Kennedy wanted to abolish their financial control.

    So if we are advancing any conspiracy theories this is a plausible as any.

     

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to CatfishHunter's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to CatfishHunter's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Obviously any conspiracy is going to pick an unconnected guy to be the fall guy. Then then silence him for good measure. And just as obviously the plethora of evidence that point to more than Oswald being involved trumps the simple theory you just expressed.

    Did you hear, the US Congress investigated this and said it was a conspiracy. The acoustic evidence alone is virtually irrefutable.

    [/QUOTE]

    US Congress.   Got to hand it to you.  That's funny!

    [/QUOTE]


    The US Congress and basically everybody else except a few gullible people and the Warren Commission. LMAO

    [/QUOTE]

    The United States House Select Committee on Assassinations put too much stock in what they thought at the time the accoustical evidence showed.  It has been largely debunked.

    [/QUOTE]

    By who, some internet blog?

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from CatfishHunter. Show CatfishHunter's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to ghostofjri37's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    If there was a conspiracy you need to follow the money. Never underestimate the greed of obscenely rich people. they will do whatever it takes to stay obscenely rich. Shlt the only reason people go to war is over ideology and money.

    The federal reserve is controlled by an elite few in the world and Kennedy wanted to abolish their financial control.

    So if we are advancing any conspiracy theories this is a plausible as any.

     

    [/QUOTE]


    There has never been a single President in history that did not have "enemies" of one sort or another.   But that doesn't mean those groups/individuals would have anything to do with the death of someone.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to ghostofjri37's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    an elite few in the world 

    [/QUOTE]

    Yep, those are the guys. And the man of perdition is pulling their strings as well.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from CatfishHunter. Show CatfishHunter's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to CatfishHunter's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    As for Oswald's "ties" ... my god, Leon Czolgosz was an open anarchist.   Sometimes lunatics act alone.

    [/QUOTE]

    LMAO Did Leon have connections to the CIA like Oswald?

    [/QUOTE]


    Trying to trip me up.  The CIA wasn't around at the time of McKinley's death.  So, no Leon had no such connections.   But he was an open anarchist.   Ask around.   You'll see.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from ccsjl. Show ccsjl's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    What nobody brings up about the second shooter who missed theory, is simply where did the bullet go? Fired from basically ground level the bullet if missed would then hit somebody in the crowd. At least all Oswalds fired bullets were accounted for....

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from ghostofjri37. Show ghostofjri37's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to CatfishHunter's comment:

    In response to ghostofjri37's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    If there was a conspiracy you need to follow the money. Never underestimate the greed of obscenely rich people. they will do whatever it takes to stay obscenely rich. Shlt the only reason people go to war is over ideology and money.

    The federal reserve is controlled by an elite few in the world and Kennedy wanted to abolish their financial control.

    So if we are advancing any conspiracy theories this is a plausible as any.

     




    There has never been a single President in history that did not have "enemies" of one sort or another.   But that doesn't mean those groups/individuals would have anything to do with the death of someone.

    [/QUOTE]

    not saying it happpened but executive order 11110 didn't sit to well with a select few.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Different topic - 11/22/1963

    In response to HeygangLH's comment:
    [QUOTE]


    hey look at this. They are talking conspiracy theories and Babe is right in the middle of it.....again. SHOCKER.

    hey babe you are almost at the 16,000 post number...don't you work or is this your work. talk about being addicted to hearing yourself talk. Did you use the LMAO in all 16,0000?

    hey we all took a vote.Everybody. We want you take next week off in here. You need and we most definately need it.

    have a great week babe.

    [/QUOTE]


    LMAO

    I use that a lot because I find twits like you to be hilarious.

    I'm retired dufus. Have been semi-retired since I was 52.

    I just took 5 days off you nincompoop.

    You should get your ducks in a row about me and conspiracy theories. Rusty is the one who espouses conspiracies against the Pats and BB, not me dum bass.

    Glad you could stop by for your daily bludgeoning fool.

     

Share