Re: Does bb cut cunningham in offseason? if he needs peds just to make it to this level of play, what will he be without it.
posted at 11/30/2012 7:08 PM EST
In response to Neal Page's comment:
As for question #2, they're amphetamines. I know they're illegal. I asked why you think the NFL doesn't consider them PEDs. You still can't answer it because if you did, you'd actually agree with my point about this being about fear of lawsuits and negligence, and have to admit you now see the point, but after 3 pages of your arguing, it's somewhat embarrassing that you did miss my point.
They ARE NOT mentioned as PEDs, but the connection is that the drug family of Adderall or Cocaine are the fact they are amphetamines. So, how can only the prescribed one be a PED, but the other amphetamine, while illegal, NOT be? It has nothing to do with what is illegal or not legal, because Adderall without a prescription is illegal anyway.
It's impossible. They're both amphetamines so they'd both have to be listed as PEDs to be PEDs! Aren't you the guy on here also supporting the other person's presposterous claim that cannibis is also a PED? LOL
The only reason these are on a list is for this billion dollar organizations to defend against lawsuits. It's called negligence. Get it?
Any perceived risky drugs is automatically attached to the "banned" list, but that doesn't mean something like cocaine or Adderall as amphetamines are PEDs.
You seem to have a problem understanding these concepts.
Come on man, are you serious? The reason I have a problem understanding your so called "concepts" are because they are phantom ideas of yours. You are really reaching here!