Re: Era of the TE
posted at 9/19/2012 12:24 AM EDT
In response to anonymis' comment:
In response to bredbru's comment:
In response to inbredbru's comment:
In Response to Re: Era of the TE:
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: Era of the TE : LMAO....right, so, it was a new idea last year when you brought it up the first time Besides, even if they put in 4 TEs in as WRs....just because they do it once (or twice) as a gimmick - does not an era make.......
Posted by anonymis
Hey now it must be your turn to be heard. Let me see I have nothing to say but I b!thched at the other guy (I really told Him) now I might as well b!tch at this guy for the same thing. Gee I have nothing to say but I will just lurk around to see how many people I can B!tch at.
Grow the FK up and learn to be a contributing portion of society in stead of a Lurking leach hoping to jump in and cry like a little b!tch about what others say.
board mess up. i replied to this post above in reply to parttimer aka inbredbru
pattimer why dont you post under your own name when you want to make an attack instead of masking your
identitiy by logginout and logging back in under another identity to do so....
No worries.....I think there have been numerous posters who brought up 2 TE power formations a while ago in spread formations, ect.
anonymis you are aware "INBREDRU" is an identity created to mock me (bredbru). you are not allowed to make intelligent observations (without it insulting the incredibly insecure). so someone created this identity.
please understand the difference, though it is confusing, so not to miscontrue me.