Re: Feminization of Pro Football Continues
posted at 10/3/2009 9:47 PM EDT
In Response to Re: Feminization of Pro Football Continues
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: Feminization of Pro Football Continues : Alone or not, wearing pink isn't "finding your feminine side". It is saying eff you to anyone who has notions that color defines a person. I guess you can take solace in that you aren't alone. Or, you can just be yourself and not worry about what others think of you.
Posted by EnochRoot[/QUOTE]
First, GREAT statement Enochroot
... Next, So far the only single person who made an intelligent comment in the "Con" camp for wearing a d#mn pink glove, was Hog
...who said something like, "Would Roger Goodel have a problem IF Moss wore something pink for a month...I bet he would
," and more importantly, "Why NOT a Prostate Cancer Day, Is not Prostate Cancer a noble cause too
First, I hear ya...the "corporation T-shirt, stupid, bloody Tuesday
," part (ya know, "I Am the Walrus
"...(goo-goo-ga-joob)), and I know this was said tongue-in-cheek, But the more I think about it (with Hog's
second statement), H#ll, I wouldn't have a problem with NFL players wearing a different patch EVERY week to promote a worthy cause...IF the money and media that comes with Pro Football can help someone homeless, or starving, or menatlly ill, or that has Cancer, The Better this WORLD would be...
First, To those who are complaining about "The Feminization of EVERYthing Masculine
...". What can I say? Women are one day (they still currently aren't half the time) going to be making equal pay as YOU for equal work...get over it. Besides, THIS is NOT the Issue at hand, So don't try to make his into something it's not, for your own
Second (more of a real issue), I hear those, that are talking about just wanting "The PURE entertainment
" Release that comes with the simple unfettered enjoyment in this world that is so
blitzed with Ads (and whatever the freakin' 'cause' of the week is), BUT IF done tastefully with some patch or whatever, I'm ALL for ANY entertainment easing ANYone's great suffering, and believe (again) that revenue/awareness and all that comes with this which accounts for 30 ridiculous seconds of airtime, and with a symbol in question accounting for ZERO eyestrain (for those still without 70 inch high-def TVs)...Ask Yourselves Please, "Do ANY of You ALL really believe that The efforts of YOU Doing Without the keeping this game "untainted" with a colored patch or a pink glove, Will be NOT be trumped by feeding a starving child, or helping someone DYING
?" Honestly, How selfish Are
YOU? of note
: Props to whoever said this great one-liner: "I agree with willrunz. If this (wearing a pink glove) rocks your world, then your world may need some examination
: "Yes," to carawaydj
take you seriously, when you said, "IF the NFL does this, Cheerleaders should be topless for the game...
". I...umm, see zero problem with this trade-off...none at all in fact (and yeah, If this "waters-down" all the 'positive' and 'enlightened' proselytizing I just did in the first part...well...well, scr#w it).