Hakeem Nicks or Josh Gordon anyone?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from mrbungle. Show mrbungle's posts

    Hakeem Nicks or Josh Gordon anyone?

    Probably long shots but, IMO counting on Amendola is unrealistic at this point. Wouldn't rule either of these out as possibilities.

    1. WR Hakeem Nicks, New York Giants –
     Nicks is in the final year of his contract. Although the Giants viewed him as their No. 1 receiver coming into the season and as a vital cog, coach Tom Coughlin indicated Wednesday that Nicks hasn’t been as reliable this season. Considering the overall circumstances, the Giants might part with him for a lower-round pick, such as in the fourth round.

    Most likely suitors: Indianapolis, New England, Detroit, Kansas City.

    2. WR Josh Gordon, Cleveland Browns – Gordon’s name is in play even though he has been Cleveland’s most explosive skill-position player this season. Gordon is averaging 16.7 yards per catch this season and 16.3 in his two seasons. He is an excellent deep threat. However, his two-game suspension for violation of the substance abuse policy (and a history of substance abuse that dates to 2010 at Baylor), makes Browns management worried. And this management didn’t draft Gordon. It will probably take a high pick to get him because he’s under contract for two more years, but if some team is willing to roll the dice, Gordon could be had.

    Most likely suitors: San Francisco, Indianapolis, New England.

    Link: http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Top-10-players-who-could-be-traded.html

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from NOISE. Show NOISE's posts

    Re: Hakeem Nicks or Josh Gordon anyone?

    Long term, Gordon.  Young, and won't require the big money like nicks wants.  Gordon could be good for years...and just scratching the surface.  Short term, Nicks too injury prone for me, but he only requires a 3 rd to get him for half a season.   

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from 49Patriots. Show 49Patriots's posts

    Re: Hakeem Nicks or Josh Gordon anyone?

    Brady prefers slot WRs. 

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from Quagmire3. Show Quagmire3's posts

    Re: Hakeem Nicks or Josh Gordon anyone?

    for about the 10th time in the 10th thread in the last 10 days on these two; NO!

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from TFB12. Show TFB12's posts

    Re: Hakeem Nicks or Josh Gordon anyone?

    If one of our WRs should happen to go down tomorrow then the Pats need to make a push to get Gordon.  Otherwise I don't see either guy coming to NE.  Isn't Tuesday the deadline for trades?

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from kansaspatriot. Show kansaspatriot's posts

    Re: Hakeem Nicks or Josh Gordon anyone?


    I'd go after Vincent Jackson. dude is not even being used doen in Tampa.

     

    BB can get a nice deal with his buddy Shano

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Thesemenarecowards. Show Thesemenarecowards's posts

    Re: Hakeem Nicks or Josh Gordon anyone?

    On what planet did the Giants "view Nicks as their #1 receiver coming into the season".  They paid Cruz and not Nicks. 

    Agree that the Pats would be wise to kick the tires on finding another WR but don't think these guys are it.  Nicks is a FA so he really isn't worth much more than a late round pick.  Don't know how eager the Browns are to unload Gordon....

     

Share