Re: How much better would our D-fence be with Mike Vrabel? and why?
posted at 10/24/2009 11:04 AM EDT
In Response to How much better would our D-fence be with Mike Vrabel? and why?
[QUOTE]Slow but smart. I agree that the new speed on Defense is the key to the future. To bad we had to lose so much experience at the same time. I have faith and can see the reasoning, just hated losing all the rings experience in one year.
Posted by gmbill[/QUOTE]
Post and NickC's
1st Post iterate my sentiments exactly
... The NFL is a Young Man's League (ageless freaks of nature like Seau, Excluded). The Game is SO fast, and It IS
Tough losing all that Experience, Leadership and vast football smarts, BUT Production
: hard-hitting Stops on D, stretching the field with a blazer wideout...THESE
are things that are the Trump Card. Now, "How Much Better WOULD We be with Mike Vrabel still on the team
," One asks?
Again, Factor in his Leadership, Football IQ, The Fact that He was CONSISTENTLY "manning" that OLB spot (i.e. NEVER injured) AND THEN Multiply it by what matters MOST OF ALL
: Producing on the Field
..."making plays", Here...We'll multiply it by 1 (which IF I recall correcly was Mike Vrabel's SACK TOTAL ALL of Last Season)...
IF You do that Math Equation Correctly, YOU ALL will have Your Answer (and the meaning of the universe)... Myself? I was an English-Philosophy/Linguistics Dble Major...So forget about it 'cause I'm just happy when I'm in the $5 range of figuring out my Grand Total when pulling up to the Drive-Thru Window, after ordering 2 Items on the McDonald's Dollar Value Menu...(in otherwords, that means I suk)...