posted at 5/23/2011 7:25 PM EDT
In Response to Re: LAWL
[QUOTE]Show us the way Laz.
Posted by UD6[/QUOTE]
Alright, alright... Like IF you could add just a little tiny bit more detail to it, ALWAYS do. Say you've seen the pic of Brady goin' down the slide, and immediately equate it with looking "girly". Well, you take the next step in his (and your own) childishness, and ask: "Alright, Gotta figure out the MOST girly image...He looks like a lil' girl, so BAM=Girl Scout." Then you just take of from there: Little story on how & why he's there (AS a "girl-scout"). Story takes a backseat to detailed imagery here...Remember the story WILL come; And it'll come based off the detailed imagery provided (why do the extra work? That's my motto)...
So Brady the girl scout's goin' down the slide, and Why's he even there? Because he's won the girl scout cookie contest...! Again: Just add more and more detail...rankin' on his girl scout rival, adding girl scout cookie names. Now, I ONLY know of the "Thin Mint". No...hopefully excessive knowledge on Girl Scouts themselves OR their Cookies=Not a good thing to have, & not my trademark. Yet, IS it worth it to just spend 1 extra sec to Google "Types of Girl Scout Cookies"? YES! Of COURSE it is!
Then as Brady's goin' down the slide, and he's bustin' on his rival, "Suzie (with a "z" as is your purpose here)- stinkin' Smithson", you take an extra mile by saying: "Suzie stinkin' Smithson, sure wish u could Tag-Alongs, but Thank-U-Berry-Munch & Thanks-A-Lot for the sweet & tastey trip to the waterpark, hopin' you appreciate your Shout-Outs as you're home sulking over milk and the 37 boxes of cookies, your mom worthlessly bought to pad your stats!"
Too much? Noooo! Never enough!