In response to Harvey-Wallbanger's comment:
Did you or did you not come here and say two things yesterday BEFORE your game vs SD, Mr. Cocky?
1. "Colts D have allowed fewer points than NE."
2. "Your WRs have a lot of drops."
Did you not say those two things in the same day? Reggie Wayne had an easy drop and your team had a bunch all game. Oh, the irony.
You also said "Colts allowed less points" before your Week 6 game, Me. Sneaky. The Colts have allowed 1 more point than our superior D, which makes it even more comical.
Could it be that the combo of me calling the Pats gameplan to the T and seeing how they can beat a team like NOs, even without Gronk, with you coming here and volunteering info that backfired hilariously so, has got you in this little tizzy of yours?
Could it be that?
I said both things and both things were true. What does this have to do with you saying but then walking away from you indy tanked comment? what does this have to do with you not explaining how the colts have a winning record beating two SB contenders without the pagano effect? what does this have to do with you not knowing Indy's offensive approach this year or if Toler is any good? or not knowing that the colts only were in the red zone once last night?
russ, quit jumping around like you have ADHD. I know you are being owned post by post, but lets stay on task. And in response to your post. Again, both things were true. And having a one point points allowed differential over 6 games does not make the pats d better especially when its been proven that the colts have faced better offenses than the pats.
Looking forward to your next topic - because I know you won't stay on these. I'll give you this, though; its better to walk away from lost arguments than to keep arguing them. good for you russ. Fresca?