No bail out from the refs this week

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from wmasschilly. Show wmasschilly's posts

    Re: No bail out from the refs this week

    Beat it punk youre making my beer warm

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from wmasschilly. Show wmasschilly's posts

    Re: No bail out from the refs this week

    Dude I understand you don't like the pats, fine---but REALLY?

    thas was absolutely a clear PI

    (although according to Phil Simms, blatant or not,it shouldn't   be called at the end of the game)

     

     

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from wmasschilly. Show wmasschilly's posts

    Re: No bail out from the refs this week

    I just pointed out that Simms conceeded it was a PI--and it was period!

    now I know you're simply a moron--adios

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from ANumber1Roy. Show ANumber1Roy's posts

    Re: No bail out from the refs this week

    You don't make that call when the Receiver clearly wasn't prevented from making the catch. That was a instance when the refs let them play which I'm cool with. Pats got a weak similiar call last week with Boyce in the end zone and while some will say that makes up for the Keuchly one the other week it still screwed the Browns in a close game and gave us that game.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from AFNAV130. Show AFNAV130's posts

    Re: No bail out from the refs this week

    In response to wmasschilly's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    I just pointed out that Simms conceeded it was a PI--and it was period!

    now I know you're simply a moron--adios

    [/QUOTE]

    Of course it was. Does it matter no! Because our play calling and blah blah. Wow. When they take it away from you, doesn't it make everything else irrelevant?

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from getdrunkstupit. Show getdrunkstupit's posts

    Re: No bail out from the refs this week

    In response to PatsGetScrewedFinally's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to wmasschilly's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    I just pointed out that Simms conceeded it was a PI--and it was period!

    now I know you're simply a moron--adios

    [/QUOTE]

    Nice story, but Simms didn't concede anything loser.  Show me the link moron! 

    [/QUOTE]


    my eyes do.  they saw patriots get mugged again.  pats get bagged again.  why come here to point out minor things that go both ways.  you nag in un important plays. 

    if a wr can't put his hands up.  in the 60 minutes.  its PI.  no argument boy

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from wmasschilly. Show wmasschilly's posts

    Re: No bail out from the refs this week

    In response to AFNAV130's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to wmasschilly's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    I just pointed out that Simms conceeded it was a PI--and it was period!

    now I know you're simply a moron--adios

    [/QUOTE]

    Of course it was. Does it matter no! Because our play calling and blah blah. Wow. When they take it away from you, doesn't it make everything else irrelevant?

    [/QUOTE]

    it certainly makes it frustrating because you expect the rules to apply for 60 minutes! Obviously people can point to other missed opportunities but that's play where you do what your suppose to and Hooman doesn't get the chance to make a play bc of a blatant foul

     

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from Eldunker. Show Eldunker's posts

    Re: No bail out from the refs this week

    A little boy comes on here and tries his hardest to start a troll fight.  Its old. Its redundant. Its boring.  Do something productive sonny boy.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from AFNAV130. Show AFNAV130's posts

    Re: No bail out from the refs this week

    In response to wmasschilly's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to AFNAV130's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to wmasschilly's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    I just pointed out that Simms conceeded it was a PI--and it was period!

    now I know you're simply a moron--adios

    [/QUOTE]

    Of course it was. Does it matter no! Because our play calling and blah blah. Wow. When they take it away from you, doesn't it make everything else irrelevant?

    [/QUOTE]

    it certainly makes it frustrating because you expect the rules to apply for 60 minutes! Obviously people can point to other missed opportunities but that's play where you do what your suppose to and Hooman doesn't get the chance to make a play bc of a blatant foul

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Exactly. Again, it's what the NFL wants. To analyze the "missed" opportunities instead of putting the spotlight on horrendous officiating, in key situations. That 4th and 5 was one. Holding. No call. 

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonTrollSpanker. Show BostonTrollSpanker's posts

    Re: No bail out from the refs this week

    I encourage not responding to this classless individual

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from wmasschilly. Show wmasschilly's posts

    Re: No bail out from the refs this week

    Agree, in fact I would say he needs a little "spanking" lol

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     

Share