NY Post Implies Jets to Trade Revis to Pats

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from pauldeba. Show pauldeba's posts

    NY Post Implies Jets to Trade Revis to Pats

    "Jets keeping Revis off IR

    Wanting to take the chance on the possibility that Darrelle Revis might recover in time for Super Bowl XLVII .."
     
    Kind of weird, but it's being reported that way
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from BubbaInHawaii. Show BubbaInHawaii's posts

    Re: NY Post Implies Jets to Trade Revis to Pats

    I would not be opposed to have Revis on the Patriots, however, the rumor is simply far fetched.


    Re-read clip...no mention of trade...

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: NY Post Implies Jets to Trade Revis to Pats

    In response to BubbaInHawaii's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    I would not be opposed to have Revis on the Patriots, however, the rumor is simply far fetched.

    [/QUOTE]


    read the OP again LMAO

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from AZPAT. Show AZPAT's posts

    Re: NY Post Implies Jets to Trade Revis to Pats

    Revis on one leg looks to be a better defender than the whole bunch the Pats now have on roster.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: NY Post Implies Jets to Trade Revis to Pats

    In response to AZPAT's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Revis on one leg looks to be a better defender than the whole bunch the Pats now have on roster.

    [/QUOTE]

    sure im buying the jets want to trade their best player.... Not a whack at anyone here, but seriously questioning the journalistic integrity.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from soups. Show soups's posts

    Re: NY Post Implies Jets to Trade Revis to Pats

    It's a joke, meant to be read sarcastically.  That or Rex is delusional again. 

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: NY Post Implies Jets to Trade Revis to Pats

    this was a joke, the OP is saying the article is suggesting a trade to the pats because the pats will be in the super bowl, not the jets.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: NY Post Implies Jets to Trade Revis to Pats

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    this was a joke, the OP is saying the article is suggesting a trade to the pats because the pats will be in the super bowl, not the jets.

    [/QUOTE]

    thanks for clearing up. didnt read. made the mistake of taking post at face vale.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from hang3xc. Show hang3xc's posts

    Re: NY Post Implies Jets to Trade Revis to Pats

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    this was a joke, the OP is saying the article is suggesting a trade to the pats because the pats will be in the super bowl, not the jets.

    [/QUOTE]


    It's not as funny when you gotta explain it ! LOL

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from hang3xc. Show hang3xc's posts

    Re: NY Post Implies Jets to Trade Revis to Pats

    double post

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from Philskiw1. Show Philskiw1's posts

    Re: NY Post Implies Jets to Trade Revis to Pats

    didn't the Jests win the superbowl this preseason?

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from antibody. Show antibody's posts

    Re: NY Post Implies Jets to Trade Revis to Pats

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    didn't the Jests win the superbowl this preseason?

    [/QUOTE]

    They win it every pre-season.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from ma6dragon9. Show ma6dragon9's posts

    Re: NY Post Implies Jets to Trade Revis to Pats

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    this was a joke, the OP is saying the article is suggesting a trade to the pats because the pats will be in the super bowl, not the jets.

    [/QUOTE]


    Awwww. I was enjoying the responses taking it as fact.

    That was a good one. Well done Paul!

     

Share