Re: Polian "D" Formula: Rushing the Passer = Winning
posted at 5/15/2010 1:08 AM EDT
In Response to Re: Polian "D" Formula: Rushing the Passer = Winning
Their D is a joke. There pass rush leads to winning theory is exactly why they dont win when it counts. They dont know how to stop the run because all their players are built to rush the passer. Tony D and his Tampa Two defense *SUCK balls. I have never liked this style of play and i never will. I live and breath defense its all i ever wanted to play i had no interest at all as a kid in the offense so when i say watching the Colts play defense makes me want to *puke please know that I have seen many a bad defense and none make me sick as much as that puss puss style of D they play in Indy.
Posted by MVPKilla2009
Allow me to detail what killa
is saying in otherwords:
Some uncreative imbec!le took a standard 4-3 Defense, mainly as some vague counter D to the West Coast Offense, AND that genius says, "O.k., We'll have the four lineman 1-gap rushing the ball at the snap like speed demons, and the rest of our guys will play the most uncreative zone containment defense with each (including the CBs, In charge of a specific bubble area of the field, like so:
LB LB LB
So he goes, "We'll give 'em the 100 yard run games, but who cares, We'll stop the pass based on speed rushing the passer, and by quick reacting guys everywhere else, based again-on speed, But we'll make up for the size and massive unoriginality factor, by "gang-tackling. I mean, we'll never be trully dominant as a Defense, Unless by some freak luck of nature, we get a HOF QB and the other team then has to be playing catch-up real quick and for most of the game, BUT man it's already 4:50 pm Friday, and dang-it, I said I'd have a Defense done before quittin' time, and I WILL!"
THEN, lo and behold upon dubbing this a Cover 2, or 3, or who cares Defense, ANOTHER even more uncreative mor#n than the first guy, says to himself, "Man this D is gettin' torn up by the more accurate NFL QBs, even with our speed rushing D-Lineman, and well- I heard someone in the stands say that I should 'Be looking for the soft spots in this defense that these QBs have been using as target practice areas;' So alright, we got 1 very obvious one behind the MLB and in between the two Safeties in that mid- deep-mid portion of the field. And I guess we got 2 other ones behind the CBs and in that coverage bubble before where the Safety on each side takes over... And krikees! It's 4:55pm on Friday and I said that I'd fix this pathetically unoriginal piece of garbage D, BEFORE quittin' time... So look, we'll just have that MLB drop into a deeper zone than before, far downfield into the secondary, and now Both Safeties have a little less space to worry about, So they can worry a little more with inching forward to help the 2 soft spots behind the CBs and to the side of the OLBs and in front of them, the Safeties... OMG, 4:58 pm...boy was that a tough call, Hey Fred the Janitor!: Can you give my timecard a punch, seein' as you're gonna be here til 7 p.m. anyways... Da Names 'TONY DUNGY' pal...uh-oh, hold on a sec, I forgot to name this unbelievable work of genius defense that I just created/fixed, Well-seein' as how I'm on Tampa, and the one it's based off of was a 2 or 3, I'm just goin' with Tampa 2, and MAN! 5:01? I better be gettin' some serious OT for this work...".