Re: PROOF of anti-patriots media bias
posted at 12/8/2011 10:07 AM EST
In Response to Re: PROOF of anti-patriots media bias
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: PROOF of anti-patriots media bias : You're a moron. JIm Trotter of SI just did a piece 3 weeks ago about why the Packers D is fine even if they give up a ton of passing yards or passing/rushing yards. Meanwhile, the media overdramatizes the idea that NE allows just a tad more of these yards per game, allows LESS points per game, is a much better Run D and is 2nd in the NFL to GB in INTS against a tougher schedule. So, sorry, there is a clear bias without question when discussing each team's D. If NE gave up 30 points to Christian Ponder or 38 to Rivers and SD, this board would explode. Finally, the bias is CLEARLY predicated on the fact the media hates BB enough to spin or lie outright, while McCarthy is liked just fine. Capiche, Einstein?
Posted by RidingWithTheKingII[/QUOTE]
Einstein was a moron?
The tweeter who is a boston local and a pats fan said the same thing about the pats and the packers. where's the bias.
The colts have had abyssmal defenses for years and Manning kept them competitive. That's what Brady is doing now.
And yes I think the packers D is better than the pats. The packers have played better offenses than the pats. The patriots lost to the teams they played that had good offenses. NYG, Buff (early in the season). They beat Dallas. The packers have beaten all of the teams they have played including those with good offenses. NO, NYG, Detroit, Atl.
And I'll say it again, I don't care who Belichick played, his D gave up 350 and 81% to Orlovsky who also happened to short arm a sure TD pass early in the game last week.
Bias is not seeing this reality.
Brady deserves alot of accolades for carrying his team this years. He's been very Manning-like.
And the poin