Talib back next year ?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from NoahJustin. Show NoahJustin's posts

    Re: Talib back next year ?

    Wasn't this the guy alot of posters were calling a thug when we first traded for him? Claimed he was going to be a malcontent and what was BB thinking?

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from rkarp. Show rkarp's posts

    Re: Talib back next year ?

    Just curious. BB gets all the kudos for trading for Talib and turning the season around. BB also gets kudos for the Dennerd find in the late rounds. 

    If the Pats have to go over board to sign a cover corner, be it Talib or some one else, and it costs the Pats Vollmer or Wes, does BB get criticized for RasI, Wilson or Chung not panning out? 3 second round draft choices not contributing much, although it is early on Wilson. 

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from anonymis. Show anonymis's posts

    Re: Talib back next year ?

    In response to NoahJustin's comment:

    Wasn't this the guy alot of posters were calling a thug when we first traded for him? Claimed he was going to be a malcontent and what was BB thinking?




    lol it's amazing how winning helps people overlook those things

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: Talib back next year ?

    In response to anonymis' comment:

    In response to NoahJustin's comment:

     

    Wasn't this the guy alot of posters were calling a thug when we first traded for him? Claimed he was going to be a malcontent and what was BB thinking?

     




    lol it's amazing how winning helps people overlook those things

     



    the opposite of how i called it at the time

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from NY-PATS-FAN4. Show NY-PATS-FAN4's posts

    Re: Talib back next year ?

    I think he looks and sounds like Snoop Dog...

     

    ...Gin and Juice.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Philskiw1. Show Philskiw1's posts

    Re: Talib back next year ?

    No way we sign Welker for 5 years.  The length of contract is the whole sticking point.  

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: Talib back next year ?

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:

    No way we sign Welker for 5 years.  The length of contract is the whole sticking point.  



    length of contract means nothing. its the guaranteed money that matters.

    football players can be cut at any time

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Philskiw1. Show Philskiw1's posts

    Re: Talib back next year ?

    In response to bredbru's comment:

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:

     

    No way we sign Welker for 5 years.  The length of contract is the whole sticking point.  

     



     

    length of contract means nothing. its the guaranteed money that matters.

    football players can be cut at any time



    They offered him 2-18.  All guaranteed money. Welker wants a 4 or 5 yr contract.  Google it.   He's too old for that long of a contract.  

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: Talib back next year ?

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:

    In response to bredbru's comment:

     

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:

     

    No way we sign Welker for 5 years.  The length of contract is the whole sticking point.  

     



     

    length of contract means nothing. its the guaranteed money that matters.

    football players can be cut at any time

     



    They offered him 2-18.  All guaranteed money. Welker wants a 4 or 5 yr contract.  Google it.   He's too old for that long of a contract.  

     



    one more time, length of contract means nothing (re the team's obligation)

    he yields on per year or hes tagged (or let go)

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Philskiw1. Show Philskiw1's posts

    Re: Talib back next year ?

    In response to bredbru's comment:

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:

     

    In response to bredbru's comment:

     

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:

     

    No way we sign Welker for 5 years.  The length of contract is the whole sticking point.  

     



     

    length of contract means nothing. its the guaranteed money that matters.

    football players can be cut at any time

     



    They offered him 2-18.  All guaranteed money. Welker wants a 4 or 5 yr contract.  Google it.   He's too old for that long of a contract.  

     

     



    one more time, length of contract means nothing (re the team's obligation)

     

    he yields on per year or hes tagged (or let go)



    It means something to Welker. what's wrong wit 18 m guaranteed for 2 years By your reasoning. 

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from aussiewill2. Show aussiewill2's posts

    Re: Talib back next year ?

    The guy can play, as said he gives the defense swagger, he's aggressive plays his man tight, makes a small window for the quarterback. Tackles well, very seldom fooled . He and Dennard are the big differences in last years team. I think they win the SB , and they will be very instrumental, especially Talib.

    I hope they resign him.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: Talib back next year ?

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:

    In response to bredbru's comment:

     

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:

     

    In response to bredbru's comment:

     

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:

     

    No way we sign Welker for 5 years.  The length of contract is the whole sticking point.  

     



     

    length of contract means nothing. its the guaranteed money that matters.

    football players can be cut at any time

     



    They offered him 2-18.  All guaranteed money. Welker wants a 4 or 5 yr contract.  Google it.   He's too old for that long of a contract.  

     

     



    one more time, length of contract means nothing (re the team's obligation)

     

    he yields on per year or hes tagged (or let go)

     



    It means something to Welker. what's wrong wit 18 m guaranteed for 2 years By your reasoning. 

     

    re it means somsething to welker: thats exa tly why i offer that many years.

    re 18 mil fopr 2 years
    for me , its too much money per year with the cap and with the needs we have this season.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from Philskiw1. Show Philskiw1's posts

    Re: Talib back next year ?

    In response to bredbru's comment:

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:

     

    In response to bredbru's comment:

     

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:

     

    In response to bredbru's comment:

     

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:

     

    No way we sign Welker for 5 years.  The length of contract is the whole sticking point.  

     



     

    length of contract means nothing. its the guaranteed money that matters.

    football players can be cut at any time

     



    They offered him 2-18.  All guaranteed money. Welker wants a 4 or 5 yr contract.  Google it.   He's too old for that long of a contract.  

     

     



    one more time, length of contract means nothing (re the team's obligation)

     

    he yields on per year or hes tagged (or let go)

     



    It means something to Welker. what's wrong wit 18 m guaranteed for 2 years By your reasoning. 

     

     

     

    re it means somsething to welker: thats exa tly why i offer that many years.

    re 18 mil fopr 2 years
    for me , its too much money per year with the cap and with the needs we have this season.



    That's what they offered him because we don't want to give an " older" receiver a 5 year contract.  

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: Talib back next year ?

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:

    In response to bredbru's comment:

     

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:

     

    In response to bredbru's comment:

     

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:

     

    In response to bredbru's comment:

     

    In response to Philskiw1's comment:

     

    No way we sign Welker for 5 years.  The length of contract is the whole sticking point.  

     



     

    length of contract means nothing. its the guaranteed money that matters.

    football players can be cut at any time

     



    They offered him 2-18.  All guaranteed money. Welker wants a 4 or 5 yr contract.  Google it.   He's too old for that long of a contract.  

     

     



    one more time, length of contract means nothing (re the team's obligation)

     

    he yields on per year or hes tagged (or let go)

     



    It means something to Welker. what's wrong wit 18 m guaranteed for 2 years By your reasoning. 

     

     

     

    re it means somsething to welker: thats exa tly why i offer that many years.

    re 18 mil fopr 2 years
    for me , its too much money per year with the cap and with the needs we have this season.

     



    That's what they offered him because we don't want to give an " older" receiver a 5 year contract.  

     



    5 year contrtact means nothing when you can cut him after a year. only the guaranteed money matters

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from Norger. Show Norger's posts

    Re: Talib back next year ?

    In response to aussiewill2's comment:

    The guy can play, as said he gives the defense swagger, he's aggressive plays his man tight, makes a small window for the quarterback. Tackles well, very seldom fooled . He and Dennard are the big differences in last years team. I think they win the SB , and they will be very instrumental, especially Talib.

    I hope they resign him.




    True that

     

Share