Re: This is how bad Jets blew the Tebow experiment
posted at 1/4/2013 4:03 PM EST
In response to RockScully's comment:
In response to 42AND46's comment:
In response to agcsbill's comment:
PatsEng... There is absolutely no debating QBs when comparing Tebow to Manning. What we are seeing is the media giving way too much credit to Manning in getting the Broncos to the playoffs this season. They DID get there last year without him and with Tebow as the QB, right? Manning stepped into a great situation by joining the Broncos which stayed fairly static from last year. One wonders what he could have done in Indianapolis if he had stayed there given that team's changes from last season to this one. Either way, Manning is the greatest REGULAR season QB the league has seen, huh?
kind of like how pats went 11-5 minus Tom Brady then? can't have it both ways
we know, peyton's a former colt and he could cure cancer and you'd still criticize him
No, no, no, troll boy. The point is, the media fawns over Gomer and now Eli and hold NE and Brady to a different standard. It's been going on for 10 years.
Brady could cure cancer and MS simultaneously and it would be passed off as it being because of Gomer.
That's the difference.
This goes back to when Gomer was considered better because had better stats in the regular season, with half his games in a dome and superior firepower, yet Brady would outperform Gomer every time.
Why? Brady was better. Still is for that matter.
the media fawns over Gomer and now Eli
what are you talking about? the media doesn't "fawn" over eli; they barely talk about him-he's got the lowest profile you will ever see among a starting QB for a top team
they talk about him on a national level only when he is in the SB and then afterwards for a bit-even in the playoffs it's usually the Giants front 4 or receivers or the opposing team's QB who gets more attention-you couldn't be more off base here
well, considering it's you, i guess you could be