Vernon Gholston UPDATE

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from harleyroadking1. Show harleyroadking1's posts

    Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    The highly touted 1st rounder thats pulling down 6.5 mil a year had an O-fer against the bungals so he's still holding at 6 tackles for the season. In comparison Gerald Warren has 20 tackles and 2.5 sacks. Aren't we all glad BB duped the Jest into taking him.




     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from harleyroadking1. Show harleyroadking1's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    Focus Phatty focus this is about your first round bust not your team defense.
     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from harleyroadking1. Show harleyroadking1's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    And the Pats put a 45 spot on the Lions a team you barely beat and needed the Lions to screw up to help you.
     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from harleyroadking1. Show harleyroadking1's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    why is that the Jesties needed OT to beat a 2-9 team? give up 20 points?, score only 23?
     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from apdynasty23. Show apdynasty23's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    Uh, we took Cincy's best shot with an entire season of hope, a full, healthy roster. You needed two fluky plays to beat them at home with a b@nged up team.

    See you Monday.
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from harleyroadking1. Show harleyroadking1's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    we beat the Ravens and Raven crushed the Jesties sooooooo?
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from TSWFAN. Show TSWFAN's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    In Response to Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE : Again, you are complained about the Jets beating another team.  How absurd is that?  They just barely beat the Browns too, you know the team that cushed the patsies (not the Jets, the other team that crushed the patsies).  And there is the difference in the style of football these two teams play.  The Jets are in a position to win EVERY week.  The patsies have not been. The Jets control the clock, run the ball, keep their D off the field and keep the game close.  Who was that great team a few years back that won 3 SBs with that method?
    Posted by PhatRex[/QUOTE]

    PHAT.... Jets are in position to win every week but they haven't. The PATS are in position to win when they step on the field. Have you checked strength of schedule lately? 
     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from Tcal2. Show Tcal2's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    There was a point near the end of the game last night when Theismann was spewing his typical non justified love bulls*it (the kinda stuff that got him booted from MNF) about how the great Rex loves to bring in his type of guys and work on improving players like Gholston and getting the most out of them. 

    It was at this point, after throwing up a little in my mouth, I thought of your Gholston thread.  Thanks Harley for Keeping It Real.

    Oh and the Jets winning has less to do with Rex and his players and more to do with the quality of Opponent.  The fact they are playing teams that are bottom dwellers and who have already Rolled has a much greater influence on the outcome of the game.
     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from harleyroadking1. Show harleyroadking1's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    I'm not sure if I like you thinking of after you throw up lol.



    Phatty the score might have been 10 to 9 but the Ravens dominated the jesties and we beat them soooooooo?





     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from BBReigns. Show BBReigns's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    It's not really secondary at all, because it shows you lost to two playoff bound teams and only beat one good/great team this year.

    That'w what it means.

    You just walked right into wall with that one. 

    Here is the difference between a Pats fan and Jets fan:

    1.  I am glad we won, but they can't play like that against good teams and expect to win.

    2.  We are the best. We are 9-2, our QB reminds me of Montana, and we will probably win the division.


     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from Evil2010. Show Evil2010's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    Wrong Rexy. Good teams win championships. 42 years isn't it? Good list of excuses for losing to the Ravens though.
     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from Evil2010. Show Evil2010's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    That must be why we were only played in SBs in the last decade right? As for a point? Yup 42 yeras of nothing isn't a point. Or is it just a fact you choose to pretend doesn't exist?
     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from Evil2010. Show Evil2010's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    I did forget to mention that the Jets did win the division once in the last decade. Then the next season they had to play a division winner's schedule and finished 3rd.
     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from boomerst3. Show boomerst3's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    In Response to Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE:
    [QUOTE]And somehow the Jets only gave up 10 points to the team that put up 24 on the patsies. Let's not forget that BB also tricked the Jets into taking Revis and Harris.  He is soooo tricky.
    Posted by PhatRex[/QUOTE]
    That was before the Bengals got their league leading injuries.  They were actually pretty good at the beginning of the season.

    What's your excuse for your team barely beating 4 of the worst teams in the league the last month?  And your QB getting a Dud of the Week award?
    Remember the glory days.  Namath is probably still better than Sanchez

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from boomerst3. Show boomerst3's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    In Response to Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE : Are you a Yankees fan?  You sound just like a Yankees fan? 
    Posted by PhatRex[/QUOTE]
    Yankees.  Another loser team. Spent over a billion dollars the last 10 yrs and what, 1 championship?  Nice.  Good choke agin this year.  Glad you kept Texiera from the Red Sox.  he choked

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from boomerst3. Show boomerst3's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    In Response to Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE : Again, you are complaining about the Jets beating another team.  How absurd is that?  They just barely beat the Browns too, you know the team that cushed the patsies (not the Jets, the other team that crushed the patsies).  And there is the difference in the style of football these two teams play.  The Jets are in a position to win EVERY week.  The patsies have not been. The Jets control the clock, run the ball, keep their D off the field and keep the game close.  Who was that great team a few years back that won 3 SBs with that method?
    Posted by PhatRex[/QUOTE]
    Not the Jets. Clearly you are clueless.  The Jests are in a position to win each week but the Pats are not?  Excuse me fat head.  The Pats have the same number of wins.  How do you do that if you are not in a position to win?  Get off the crack..head.  Haven't the Jests lost the same number of games, clown?

     

Share