Issues for BDC

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: Issues for BDC

    In response to pumpsie-green's comment:

    Persistent problems despite multiple complaints to fix them:

    1. Deleting posts simply because they were reported

    2. Deleting harmless threads

    3. Having to refresh the screen numerous times (I did it at least 10 times yesterday) to be able to post

    4. Getting ads in the last post box instead of the post

    These are not new problems. They have been around for months and the management has to be aware of them. Can we PLEASE get a timetable for when they will be FIXED?

     

    WE ARE ALL JUST POPPYSEEDS IN THE BAKERY OF LIFE




    Maybe now that John Henry owns the globe he will hire a webmaster that has a clue.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from pumpsie-green. Show pumpsie-green's posts

    Re: Issues for BDC

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

    In response to pumpsie-green's comment:

     

    Persistent problems despite multiple complaints to fix them:

    1. Deleting posts simply because they were reported

    2. Deleting harmless threads

    3. Having to refresh the screen numerous times (I did it at least 10 times yesterday) to be able to post

    4. Getting ads in the last post box instead of the post

    These are not new problems. They have been around for months and the management has to be aware of them. Can we PLEASE get a timetable for when they will be FIXED?

     

    WE ARE ALL JUST POPPYSEEDS IN THE BAKERY OF LIFE

     




    Maybe now that John Henry owns the globe he will hire a webmaster that has a clue.

     



    Maybe, but I am sure that this is low on his priority list. Frankly, this should have already been fixed-all of it.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from miscricket. Show miscricket's posts

    Re: Issues for BDC

    Dottie..another perfectly harmless thread..which in no way violated the TOS was removed.....just shaking my head at this point. Why bother having discussion forums if discussions are going to be arbitrarily zapped because ONE poster feels that it's run its course?

     

    http://www.boston.com/community/forums/sports/red-sox/on-the-front-burner/iggy-produces-right-away/100/6762985?ia=19535402

     

    "It is not down in any map...trueplaces never are...." ( Melville)

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: Issues for BDC

    The Moderators seem to be blocking posts because someone hits the abuse button with nothing being wrong with the post. It has especially been worse the last week. 

    They block posts of us asking why a post was blocked?  Are they that sensitive and have such big egos that we cant ask why?

    They are out of control and have done a very sub standard job IMHO.

     

    Now I hope my post doesnt get deleted for stating my opinion, as this post does NOT violate any of the rules on this forum.

     

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThefourBs. Show ThefourBs's posts

    Re: Issues for BDC

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

    The Moderators seem to be blocking posts because someone hits the abuse button with nothing being wrong with the post. It has especially been worse the last week. 

    They block posts of us asking why a post was blocked?  Are they that sensitive and have such big egos that we cant ask why?

    They are out of control and have done a very sub standard job IMHO.

     

    Now I hope my post doesnt get deleted for stating my opinion, as this post does NOT violate any of the rules on this forum.

     




    Saved for posterity. Wink

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from ampoule. Show ampoule's posts

    Re: Issues for BDC

    In response to marco0863's comment:

    In response to ThefourBs' comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

     

    The Moderators seem to be blocking posts because someone hits the abuse button with nothing being wrong with the post. It has especially been worse the last week. 

    They block posts of us asking why a post was blocked?  Are they that sensitive and have such big egos that we cant ask why?

    They are out of control and have done a very sub standard job IMHO.

     

    Now I hope my post doesnt get deleted for stating my opinion, as this post does NOT violate any of the rules on this forum.

     

     

     




    Saved for posterity. Wink

     

     

     

    [/QUOTE]

    u know ill bet these guys can be sued.

     

    [/QUOTE]


    In my opinion, the country is presently infested with lawyers.  They'll take a word and disect it until the cows come home or everyone is out of money.

    Lawyers aren't the solution.  They're the problem.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: Issues for BDC

    In response to jackbu's comment:

    serioulsy, the papi destroying the telephone thread was lifted.  I opened up my profile in case anyone wants to read my response to fourb's.




    They removed it? Good.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from miscricket. Show miscricket's posts

    Re: Issues for BDC

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to jackbu's comment:

     

     

     

    serioulsy, the papi destroying the telephone thread was lifted.  I opened up my profile in case anyone wants to read my response to fourb's.

     

     




    They removed it? Good.

     

     

     




    Not good actually. That thread in no way violated the TOS...in no way. Discussion is supposed to be about debate and multiple ideas and perspectives. How boring would it be if we all agreed.I for one am tired of having discussions that I take the time to comment on zapped because of a few thin skinned posters..and moderators who cleary just don't care.

     

    Of course..now that John Henry owns the Globe..perhaps there will be no negative threads about the Sox allowed..lol

    In any event..it's time to start shopping around for a different Sox discussion forum. It is the definition of a waste of time to continue to take the time to write well thought out comments..only to have the discussion zapped.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from pinstripezac35. Show pinstripezac35's posts

    Re: Issues for BDC

    In response to miscricket's comment:

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to jackbu's comment:

     

     

     

    serioulsy, the papi destroying the telephone thread was lifted.  I opened up my profile in case anyone wants to read my response to fourb's.

     

     




    They removed it? Good.

     

     

     




    Not good actually. That thread in no way violated the TOS...in no way. Discussion is supposed to be about debate and multiple ideas and perspectives. How boring would it be if we all agreed.I for one am tired of having discussions that I take the time to comment on zapped because of a few thin skinned posters..and moderators who cleary just don't care.

     

    Of course..now that John Henry owns the Globe..perhaps there will be no negative threads about the Sox allowed..lol

    In any event..it's time to start shopping around for a different Sox discussion forum. It is the definition of a waste of time to continue to take the time to write well thought out comments..only to have the discussion zapped.




     

     

     

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: Issues for BDC

    In response to miscricket's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to jackbu's comment:

     

     

     

    serioulsy, the papi destroying the telephone thread was lifted.  I opened up my profile in case anyone wants to read my response to fourb's.

     

     




    They removed it? Good.

     

     

     




    Not good actually. That thread in no way violated the TOS...in no way. Discussion is supposed to be about debate and multiple ideas and perspectives. How boring would it be if we all agreed.I for one am tired of having discussions that I take the time to comment on zapped because of a few thin skinned posters..and moderators who cleary just don't care.

     

    Of course..now that John Henry owns the Globe..perhaps there will be no negative threads about the Sox allowed..lol

    In any event..it's time to start shopping around for a different Sox discussion forum. It is the definition of a waste of time to continue to take the time to write well thought out comments..only to have the discussion zapped.

     




    I say good not because I agree with censorship or have "thin skin". It was becoming repetitive and posters were starting to get a bit nasty with each other. Like the Papi F word thread. It makes no sense when posters are just saying the same thing over and over and are starting to attack each other. Really, I could care less if those certain posters want to get together and endlessly bash whoever they want.

    I dont agree in general with threads getting deleted when no rules are broken. I never said I did. But my personal opinion of that thread remains the same.

    Just my opinion.

     

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from dannycater. Show dannycater's posts

    Re: Issues for BDC

    Who come the sue Pujols thread was removed?

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from dannycater. Show dannycater's posts

    Re: Issues for BDC

    I made some very strong comments on it, but it was definitely baseball related, timely, and relevant without using swear words or bad words. I'd like to think the forum is more open than this...sounds like 1984.

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from dannycater. Show dannycater's posts

    Re: Issues for BDC

    you got my vote twice-grilled

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: Issues for BDC

    In response to jackbu's comment:

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    In response to jackbu's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

     

    serioulsy, the papi destroying the telephone thread was lifted.  I opened up my profile in case anyone wants to read my response to fourb's.

     

     




    They removed it? Good.

     

     

     

    [/QUOTE]

    so was it you or fourb's?  There was no prtiz bashing going on, just facts.  If you don't like to hear both sides then use the ignore button.

     

    [/QUOTE]


    Listen Jack. I could care less to report or try and ban anyone. I gave my OPINION on the thread. No more, no less. Take your drama to someone else.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: Issues for BDC

    In response to BurritoT-'s comment:

    Public Issue #1:  ImagydSportsForTwitter

    I forgot to add the Twitter Illiterate to my election platform. 

     




    CommyContrarian and him are the same. I know he was warned about how he uses the "text language" and is now purposely misspelling words. Hes using W's where V's should be. Maybe thats why his stuff is getting banned and not so much the posts on the thread. Thats and hes using 2 aliases.

     

Share