Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from beavis. Show beavis's posts

    Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?

    Whether or not a blockbuster or just bringing in a role player for the bench, a move by managment lets the players know they are "all in"...

    Psychologically it will boost team morale?

    Thoughts
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from attic-dan. Show attic-dan's posts

    Re: Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?

       A LH reliever would be nice.
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?

    I think it could be a psychological boost to get a 'missing piece', sure.  But it might also be a psychological boost to stand pat, telling the guys 'you got what it takes'.
     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from can-you-dig-it. Show can-you-dig-it's posts

    Re: Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?

    are you saying the sox players don't currently believe that management is all in?  really?
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sheriff-Rojas. Show Sheriff-Rojas's posts

    Re: Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?

    The Sox are seriously considering a player named Stan Pat. 

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from JimfromFlorida. Show JimfromFlorida's posts

    Re: Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?

    Some times I wish people would read their posts before they hit the submit button.With a payroll at 180 million and signed Adrian and CC you think the RS players are saying...Gee if they don't go and get some one like a RH OF I don't think the FO is all in for the WS this year?????

    I for one think many RS players like the team they have now and are only looking for a Bucholz return since except for Drew the team has been going quite well.
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Soxdog67. Show Soxdog67's posts

    Re: Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?

    In Response to Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?:
    [QUOTE]Whether or not a blockbuster or just bringing in a role player for the bench, a move by managment lets the players know they are "all in"... Psychologically it will boost team morale ? Thoughts
    Posted by beavis[/QUOTE]

    OK so the fact that they traded 3 of their top prospects for Adrian Gonzalez, signed him for multiple years at $154million, and then signed Carl Crawford for multiple years at $120million, along with John Lackey from the previous offseason is still not enough indication to the current players that management is in it to win it??

    Once again beavis, can we consider this a butthead topic?
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from bald-predictions. Show bald-predictions's posts

    Re: Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?

    but Millar is happy in his mlb network job.
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from can-you-dig-it. Show can-you-dig-it's posts

    Re: Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?

    Hey BP, haven't seen you around.  We miss your insight and expert opinions
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from bald-predictions. Show bald-predictions's posts

    Re: Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?

    In Response to Re: Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?:
    [QUOTE]Hey BP, haven't seen you around.  We miss your insight and expert opinions
    Posted by can-you-dig-it[/QUOTE]
    thanks cydi, good to see you back.
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from ctredsoxfanhugh. Show ctredsoxfanhugh's posts

    Re: Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?

    wouldn't being in first place and NOT making moves show the players that management has faith in them????

    How's that for physiological?
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from beavis. Show beavis's posts

    Re: Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?

    Ryan Spillbourghs!

    Coby Rasmus would have been sweet, but looks like going to Jays...
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from the_yazzer. Show the_yazzer's posts

    Re: Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?

    In Response to Re: Sox only need to do ONE MOVE?:
    [QUOTE]The Sox are seriously considering a player named Stan Pat. 
    Posted by Sheriff-Rojas[/QUOTE]

    is that 'PAT' with one 't' or 2 't's, mr. pitt?
     

Share