Re: To all of you who use the the term
posted at 12/16/2013 2:43 PM EST
In response to Bill-806's comment:
In response to moonslav59's comment:
In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:
In response to solareclipse's comment:
Good post, Burrito, and it's not surprising you would receive hater dirve-by from Mooncrat. No one posts more subjectively selected sample size and type snipets and uses zero brain function on anything else related to anything else.
Burrito, remember the CERA and Wakefield selected stats that never ceased up until the moment Mooncrat's plea for one final 2M offer to Wakefield was rejected?
Anyone can cut and paste and excel stats, but let's leave the "WAR" and "Sample Size" for the propaganda agenda of Mooncrat and Hill. Hitting that scroll down button has never been more useful when you see these two drive-by posters go by. They also have this creepy air of seriousness with the personality of a 15 years of counting my pension days postal worker.
This Board is lame without Geo, yourself and the few other posters who simply say what's on your minds without filters. I come here to read the "seat of the pants" comments of Red Sox fans, not to read the cut and past "War" and Google nonsense that anyone can simply click to.
The irony, of course, here is that you are the undisputed king of 'sample size' cherry picking.
No doubt. softy the clown holds the record for smallest sample size defintive judgement: one pitch where a batter never took his bat off his shoulder was enough for the clown to judge a player's whole career by.
[/QUOTE]Yes Mr. MOON, but its nice to have SOFTY back !!!! We want him on this board, we need him on this board, he provides all the security to keep some of our posters from the leftside in line !!!!
This board needs Softlaw back like America needs GW Bush back!