WELFARE SCHILL files for bankruptcy and has the feds on his case! he owes between 100-500m! should he leave ESPN?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from CAPITALIST_AVENGER. Show CAPITALIST_AVENGER's posts

    WELFARE SCHILL files for bankruptcy and has the feds on his case! he owes between 100-500m! should he leave ESPN?

    http://www.boston.com/Boston/businessupdates/2012/05/rhode-island-scrambles-save-curt-schilling-game-company/IFwDL1xSka5MoSyvJpqAHJ/story.html

    seems like the resident blowhard Republican is in danger of defaulting on loan payments that the STATE of RI guaranteed on his behalf. Very interesting that these let's cut welfare for people types are the ones so interested in getting WELFARE for their corporations. who do we think pays the money for the loan guarantees to come from in the first place? oh yep the TAXPAYERS! This seems like another bad deal for the people by the corporate chasers. yep the job creators.. where are the jobs CURT? there is no downside for Curt. If he makes it big, he gets all the profits. if he loses big, the PEOPLE and state are left holding the bag. In Curt's case, its a mystery why mr. Businessman is defaulting on his obligations even as his business is apparently making money and sales tartgets. oh well...
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from fourrings. Show fourrings's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    Agree but...wrong forum
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from hankwilliamsjr. Show hankwilliamsjr's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    No one is more in trouble of defaulting than El Presidente's deficit and trillion dollar debt loading Democrat Party's something for nothing to indolent peoples republic plan.
     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from tomnev. Show tomnev's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    Why is the businesses fault when the Government decides to offer silly incentives to attract businesses to their state and the business take the opportunity. The article gives no indication as to why the company did not make the payment and rather it indicates its first product offering was a success. I would prefer to blame Government officials who know  nothing about businesses and yet have the right to use taxpayer money to invest in them...as Obama Admin did in Solyndra......why not take the novel approach of lowering taxes and then a) people will have more money to invest in companys without the government as a middle man and b) Corporations with a lower tax rate would not need other incentives to move to a state.....the reason you only see that approach in Republican States is because Democrat/Liberal states want the government involved in the middle of everything.....sorry Hank....you are right it is the wrong forum.
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from fourrings. Show fourrings's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    see what you started here........not the political forum people.
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from fourrings. Show fourrings's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    @tomnev, you realize GWB was investing in Solyndra before Obama was dont you??
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from bald-predictions. Show bald-predictions's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    In response to "Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?": [QUOTE]@tomnev, you realize GWB was investing in Solyndra before Obama was dont you?? Posted by fourrings[/QUOTE] Yeah io heard GWB was eating dogs before Obama too
     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from hill55. Show hill55's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    WEEI columnist Kirk Minihane offered his take:

    http://www.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/kirk-minihane/2012/05/16/hypocrisy-curt-schilling

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from harv53. Show harv53's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?:
    [QUOTE]@tomnev, you realize GWB was investing in Solyndra before Obama was dont you??
    Posted by fourrings[/QUOTE]

    You are wrong. They considered it but pulled the plug after the BCA. Obama resurrected it.
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from tomnev. Show tomnev's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?:
    [QUOTE]@tomnev, you realize GWB was investing in Solyndra before Obama was dont you??
    Posted by fourrings[/QUOTE]
    yes...I am aware that under the BUSH admin Solyndra applied for the Loans, and GWB admin supported them, but none were made until Obama admin took them out of the regular DOE process by inclusing them in the Stimulus funding bill...my original point was asinst always blaming business instead of Govt spending...just as bad when Repubs do it ....just more prevalant under Dems since it is a idealogical difference between them....last thing...because we shoudl talk Baseball
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from fourrings. Show fourrings's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    as i said, this isnt the political forum
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from dannycater. Show dannycater's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    No bailouts for Curt....This is not a bank.
     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from georom4. Show georom4's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    criminals are just capitalists without start up capital...right Curt?
     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from andrewmitch. Show andrewmitch's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?:
    [QUOTE]criminals are just capitalists without start up capital...right Curt?
    Posted by georom4[/QUOTE]

    Criminals are people who "Impose their will on others" .........
     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from TSWFAN. Show TSWFAN's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    In Response to SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?:
    [QUOTE]http://www.boston.com/Boston/businessupdates/2012/05/rhode-island-scrambles-save-curt-schilling-game-company/IFwDL1xSka5MoSyvJpqAHJ/story.html seems like the resident blowhard Republican is in danger of defaulting on loan payments that the STATE of RI guaranteed on his behalf. Very interesting that these let's cut welfare for people types are the ones so interested in getting WELFARE for their corporations. who do we think pays the money for the loan guarantees to come from in the first place? oh yep the TAXPAYERS! This seems like another bad deal for the people by the corporate chasers. yep the job creators.. where are the jobs CURT? there is no downside for Curt. If he makes it big, he gets all the profits. if he loses big, the PEOPLE and state are left holding the bag. In Curt's case, its a mystery why mr. Businessman is defaulting on his obligations even as his business is apparently making money and sales tartgets. oh well...
    Posted by CAPITALIST_AVENGER[/QUOTE]

    THE ONLY BLOWHARD IS YOU AXXHOLE
     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN. Show COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?:
    [QUOTE]WEEI columnist Kirk Minihane offered his take: http://www.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/kirk-minihane/2012/05/16/hypocrisy-curt-schilling
    Posted by hill55[/QUOTE]great one, he nailed it. the government should put a hard cap on entitlements for both individuals and corporations. curt, if he had any real principles, would have done what i'm doing with my marketing company. first you max out some independent traction than you request some fair partnership that doesnt leave the poor taxpayers holding the bag for A freakin
    pampered romneyish welfare capitalist millionaire ballplayer! now he's asking for more money, is this not y VENTURE CAPITALists exist or angel investors? couldnt his boy romney or his boys at bain capitals spare a few hundred billions for comrade schill?
     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN. Show COMMUNIST-CONTRARIAN's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    http://www.weei.com/sports/boston/this-just-in/21200021/reports-schillings-firm-cant-cover-11m-payment

    HERE we go.. jeez, let a working person pull this nonsense. all the bs about being accountable and responsible is such bulllll. yep here's your 1.1M check but the check wont clear, doesnt have enough funds. hey RI, just hold it for another month.. trust curt, he won world series game. so the taxpayers should offer up more WELFARE to curt and his company? if he cant make a profit or has to go bankrupt what do you know?.. more money.. at least the mexican or african-american mom on welfare can make a better case that the welfare used for her kids is a long term investment in replenishing the country and in creating a future taxpayer (potentially)... oh yep, he's a potential job "creator"...  again, why cant schill find a venture capitalist or angel private investor.. lol, the ultimate irony is if curt gets on his knees to beg obama for a BAILOUT like with GM or wall street...
     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from JimfromFlorida. Show JimfromFlorida's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?:
    [QUOTE]@tomnev, you realize GWB was investing in Solyndra before Obama was dont you??
    Posted by fourrings[/QUOTE]

    I'e checked every where and can only find the current admin handing out our money to Solyndra.
     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from JimfromFlorida. Show JimfromFlorida's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    NO business should get any bailout.
    Homeowners should not get a bailout.
    Staes should not get a bailout.
    Unions should not get a bailout.
    With bailouts some one always gets screwed.
    Usually the tax payer.

    If you take the risk you own both the reward and the failure.
    The gov't has been taking money from social security and the post office for years if they left them alone they would be sound. They rob peter to pay paul. Now they are robbing my kids and grandkids to keep themselves in office and poor businesses in place.
     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from CAPITALIST_AVENGER. Show CAPITALIST_AVENGER's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?:
    [QUOTE]NO business should get any bailout. Homeowners should not get a bailout. Staes should not get a bailout. Unions should not get a bailout. With bailouts some one always gets screwed. Usually the tax payer. If you take the risk you own both the reward and the failure. The gov't has been taking money from social security and the post office for years if they left them alone they would be sound. They rob peter to pay paul. Now they are robbing my kids and grandkids to keep themselves in office and poor businesses in place.
    Posted by JimfromFlorida[/QUOTE]
    +1, but this is idealism. that's the problem a ron paul has. sounds great in theory. I just want more proportionality. Things have gone so out of whack and troubingly tilted towards the Schillings. Everyone involved in this farce should be fired, trialed and publicly humiliated. Giving all this $ to a start-up was just dumb. its one thing if you're helping an entity with some traction. Just ridiculous.
     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from harv53. Show harv53's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?:
    [QUOTE]NO business should get any bailout. Homeowners should not get a bailout. Staes should not get a bailout. Unions should not get a bailout. With bailouts some one always gets screwed. Usually the tax payer. If you take the risk you own both the reward and the failure. The gov't has been taking money from social security and the post office for years if they left them alone they would be sound. They rob peter to pay paul. Now they are robbing my kids and grandkids to keep themselves in office and poor businesses in place.
    Posted by JimfromFlorida[/QUOTE]

    Exactly. That's why there are bankruptcy laws. Let them work.
     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from harv53. Show harv53's posts

    Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble?:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: SCHILLING'S firm is in trouble? : +1, but this is idealism. that's the problem a ron paul has. sounds great in theory. I just want more proportionality. Things have gone so out of whack and troubingly tilted towards the Schillings. Everyone involved in this farce should be fired, trialed and publicly humiliated. Giving all this $ to a start-up was just dumb. its one thing if you're helping an entity with some traction. Just ridiculous.
    Posted by CAPITALIST_AVENGER[/QUOTE]

    Why arent' you incensed at RI for investing taxpayer money on a risky venture?
    Why is Schilling to blame for this?
     

Share